Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 长沙狼友出击报告

Channel

长沙狼友出击报告

@gry121

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,458subscribers

-758 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002153946967
TypeChannel
Username@gry121
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gry121

Growth

4,4585,2164,83711 August 2026 — 5,216 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,215 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,458 subscribers11 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -758. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,344–5,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:244,458-757
12 Aug 2026, 07:315,215-1
11 Aug 2026, 17:465,216first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 4,458 subscribers
Avg views / post
470
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.198%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,820
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC311 viewsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👍 好评 【老师名称】:子怡 【学生名称】:匿名 【上课时间】:2026-08-07 【人照得分】:9 【颜值得分】:9 【身材得分】:10 【服务得分】:8 【态度得分】:9 【环境得分】:9 【过程描述】:老师长得很像邻家女孩很合我的口味,坐着和老师聊了一会儿, 从各种细节方面都能体会到,相当的爱干净,家里虽然简单,但是看着特别干净舒服,浴巾,床垫都是一次性的,洗完澡躺在床上接受老师服务, 口活真的很不错,前凸后翘的身材从后面特别爽,让我这个太久没做的一看就受不了,非常靠谱的一个老师

5 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC506 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👍 好评 【老师名称】:子怡 【学生名称】:大神魔 Elliott 【上课时间】:2026-08-05 【人照得分】:10 【颜值得分】:10 【身材得分】:10 【服务得分】:10 【态度得分】:9 【环境得分】:9 【过程描述】:房间环境挺好,很认真的帮我清洗到位,服务到位,非常温柔细致且健谈,屁股很丰满,下面非常紧致,比其他人的都有感觉,非常配合,各种姿势都可以, 口技一流,老师颜值当担,精心布置每一个细节很不错,很享受当中的过程,非常放松,有机会还会再返!

1

31 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC414 viewsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👎 差评 【老师名称】:子怡 【学生名称】:匿名 【上课时间】:2026-07-30 【人照得分】:2.0 【颜值得分】:2.0 【身材得分】:2.0 【服务得分】:2.0 【态度得分】:5.0 【环境得分】:5.0 【过程描述】:照片全部假的,估计是代聊,此公寓好多做这个的,到了随时安排。人照完全不一致。还700。算了,刚到长沙第一炮不挑。所写的服务也没有。

26 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC575 viewsread 12 August 2026

【好 中 差 】 【所在位置】洋湖会所 【老师艺名】888号 【联系方式】 @xiaoyibao88 【验证留名】十三 【验证时间】7/25 【体验细节】 在怡宝的强烈推荐下就去了888号技术,技师进门的一瞬间我恋爱了。颜值这一块顶级,生材那是没得说,让后她引导我去浴室洗了身体,然后我两躺床上聊了会情到深处忍不住跟她舌吻了起来,然后她小手摸着我的牛牛,真的爽歪歪,嘻嘻嘻蛇爽了之后就跟老师进入正题,开始展示她真正的技术了,熊不小,服务起开挺爽的嘻嘻嘻,下车还去找他,出水之后我整个人dou进入贤者模式了。奈何身体太虚,回去我就买6味地黄丸补补 妹子才18哦 很润很正点 想去的联系怡宝就说找 洋湖888号 温馨提示: 报告仅供参考

25 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC504 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👍 好评 【老师名称】:白燕 【学生名称】:匿名 【上课时间】:2026-07-25 【人照得分】:10.0 【颜值得分】:10.0 【身材得分】:10.0 【服务得分】:9.0 【态度得分】:10.0 【环境得分】:9.0 【过程描述】:身材很好,前凸后翘,本人跟照片一样,一进门老师非常热情,一起洗澡,洗完还给我热情的搽干水,全程都消毒做好准备,东西用的都是一次性的非常卫生,还让我挑一件喜欢的情趣衣,房间也非常温馨,还有一面大镜子,对着镜子干感觉不要太爽,非常满意的一次出击,还会再返

1

24 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC510 viewsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👍 好评 【老师名称】:菜菜子 【学生名称】:匿名 【上课时间】:2026-07-24 【人照得分】:10.0 【颜值得分】:8.0 【身材得分】:8.0 【服务得分】:9.0 【态度得分】:10.0 【环境得分】:7.0 【过程描述】::第一次上菜菜老师的课。首先环境比较安全,电梯需要刷卡进入。 然后见面人和照片一致(除了没那么白)其他没区别挺真实的 服务上面写的都有,最后作为一个老司机给老师点个赞,老师全程服务态度非常好,完全不是那种敷衍的。这个很加分啊,每个服务都认真在做好,聊天感觉也很舒服不尴尬,下次会继续上老师的课

12 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC719 viewsread 12 August 2026

【好 中 差 】差 【所在位置】东盈广场附近 【老师艺名】在在 【联系方式】 @zaizai017 【所在频道】茶颜悦色 【验证留名】匿名 【验证时间】7/12 【上课价位】700 【颜值身材】照片7分像 【服务内容】口 做 【体验细节】无 【服务态度】无 【优点缺点】嫩妹没服务,口只口了一分钟,妹子说没吃饭口的时候想咬下去就没口了,然后直接开始做,不能亲脖子说不适应,一点服务都没有 也没有什么情绪价值 一开始说东盈广场我到了妹子又开始说位置给错了重新发了个位置还贼难找,很差的一次cj吧,妹子还催钟 温馨提示: 报告仅供参考 报告出自茶颜悦色(https://t.me/jjkiuikll )👈点击复制

9 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC757 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👍 好评 【老师名称】:垚垚 【学生名称】:匿名 【上课时间】:2026-07-10 【人照得分】:8.0 【颜值得分】:8.0 【身材得分】:8.0 【服务得分】:7.0 【态度得分】:9.0 【环境得分】:7.0 【过程描述】:见人,是有点黑,可能灯光问题,个子小小的,态度倒是可以,课表上面写了没有口所以知道没有口了,颜值和照片一样没有照片白,然后咧洗澡说她洗了,我就去洗,洗完没有口,怎么硬呢?我说可以亲我咪咪吗,她说可以,喊她吃了下自己咪咪然后硬了自己带 t 她说不会带,刚下海没有二天,之前是做夜场的,现在喝不了了,所以换工作了,课表里面那些我自己没有做,除了口没有,其他写的我也没有要求要,反正我自己带 t 自己冲,先女上,然后传教士,后入,一样来了一遍计时应该 10 多分钟吧,她也没有催,反正被我干的啊啊叫,脸都红了,水多,偏紧的,不是很紧,可能我牛子小吧,还有一个细节,女上我让她趴着我身上,她不趴,原因就

1

8 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC710 viewsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👎 差评 【老师名称】:子怡 【学生名称】:匿名 【上课时间】:2026-07-05 【人照得分】:1.0 【颜值得分】:3.0 【身材得分】:3.0 【服务得分】:5.0 【态度得分】:5.0 【环境得分】:7.0 【过程描述】:照片全是p的。评论也是请人刷的。 400 的水平

8 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👍 好评 【老师名称】:子怡 【学生名称】:匿名 【上课时间】:2026-07-08 【人照得分】:9.5 【颜值得分】:9.8 【身材得分】:9.0 【服务得分】:9.0 【态度得分】:9.0 【环境得分】:9.0 【过程描述】:遥控上楼,进门就看见妹子穿的很性感, 本人比照片好看,简单的聊了两句,不得不说妹子很热情,帮忙脱衣服,带着去洗澡,各种挑逗,调情, 都是按课表进行的,服务很是到位, 弟弟硬的都快充血,带着保护伞直接进去,老汉推车,观音坐莲后入最舒服的,叫床呻吟让人特别兴奋,要求妹子都会尽量满足,配合度高,会引导节奏,值得推荐一下。

8 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC561 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

【评价等级】:👍 好评 【老师名称】:潘金莲 【学生名称】:工业大帝 【上课时间】:2026-07-08 【人照得分】:8.5 【颜值得分】:8.0 【身材得分】:8.5 【服务得分】:9.0 【态度得分】:9.0 【环境得分】:8.0 【过程描述】:进去老师跟我聊天,忍不住先搂入怀里抱了抱,见面一吻,大胸摸着软软的,老师很认真,前前后后,洗的很仔细,还一直陪我聊天,怕我尴尬,找了套黑色情趣,更显身材了,口了好久,时不时抬头眉眼匆匆一瞥,越发勾人心弦,感觉不推开她,会被口出来,推倒老师,我先上下其手,很舒服,🐻 部挺拔,女上比较紧,水也好多,过程中还会主动抓我的手,浑然天成的勾人小狐狸,最棒的还得后入,屁股很翘,又圆,初看御姐,床上欲姐,真的很撩人,在一声声呻吟中完美出货。 在客厅抽事后烟,一起聊天,很健谈,落落大方的,也会幽默风趣,确实好身材,颜值也在线,很舒服的一次约会,值得推荐

7 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC540 viewsread 12 August 2026

[]出击日期[]:7.7 []狼友留名[]:生 []老师花名[]:万家丽庆日17号 https://t.me/csspahsthb []开课区域[]:雨花区 []见面感觉[]:嫩妹 年轻 []身材曲线[]:身材不错 摸着很舒服 []服务技术[]:很贴心,服务到位 []人照相似[]:9成像 好看 []目测年龄[]:18 []目测罩杯[]:b []皮肤颜色[]:黄白皮 []性格态度[]:听话 态度好 []体验总结[]:看到怡宝频道里新上的妹妹,感觉特别的年轻好看,符合我的审美,决定出发看看,到店之后,等妹妹进门,很不错,和照片基本没区别,能看出年纪很小,开始还有点腼腆,服务特别的贴心,做的很到位,开始的时候有点生疏,略有点腼腆,熟悉了之后感觉挺有趣的,甜妹搞笑女,这种感觉,非常不错😋

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gry121. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 414,522 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“长沙狼友出击报告” (@gry121), 4,458 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gry121.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.