Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Growramp News

Channel

Growramp News

@growramp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,050subscribers

+99 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003504921878
TypeChannel
Username@growramp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/growramp

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9511,0501,000.57 August 2026 — 951 subscribers8 August 2026 — 951 subscribers14 August 2026 — 978 subscribers27 August 2026 — 986 subscribers3 September 2026 — 995 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,042 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,045 subscribers1 October 2026 — 1,048 subscribers8 October 2026 — 1,050 subscribers7 August 20268 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 62 days, net +99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 936–1,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 10:181,050+2
1 Oct 2026, 21:011,048+3
16 Sept 2026, 04:401,045+3
12 Sept 2026, 03:411,042+47
3 Sept 2026, 00:38995+9
27 Aug 2026, 05:33986+8
14 Aug 2026, 22:15978+27
8 Aug 2026, 00:48951no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:54951first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2338.3%
❤1830.0%
👍1830.0%
👎11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC312 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ps: nothing works? top bread-winner drying out? $$$ burned with no results? DM me / if there is an overal fit, we can hop on a growth call and see what can be done there / which of our offers could work

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC334 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Back from ASE, a couple of details on x.com/roasroi but otherwise 100% back to daily work. - Still have some concepts for the debt leadgen offer, in leadgen our top offer for several months now, we run it internally. If you want to see conversions tomorrow, have $20k+ in monthly adspend on Meta - dm and let's get started - if GLPs were difficult before, now they are even more difficult. EDs on the other hand are g…

👍4❤3

16 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC806 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Facebook has become significantly more sensitive to telehealth products over the past few weeks. Whenever possible, avoid using keywords such as GLP-1, Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, , or other drug names in your ads, creatives, and landing pages. For lower compliance risk, focus your messaging on telehealth programs,or personalized treatment plans rather than specific medications. But still, we've seen the strongest re…

👍6❤1

13 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC808 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Offer Performance Update Here are the 3 campaigns I'd be looking at this week: Homeowner Leadgen One of our strongest leadgen campaigns right now with consistent performance. We also have proven internal ad concepts that we're happy to share to help you get started faster. ED Telehealth Still one of our hottest offers, consistently delivering $5.50+ EPC with quality traffic. First Page Submit Converting at 60–70% …

🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC798 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$100mil run rate in 11 months 85% Meta from 50 to 1500 active ads (Beckham is cofounder, so that helps...) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE_algbPrwQ

🔥6❤2👍2

7 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC876 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Onboarding new Auto-Insurance offer - if you are already running volumes and need to diverisfy, DM us and let's get you approved - testing EPC around $3.4

❤3

4 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC973 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

HOT - Debt Leadgen 2 offers with a different structure, both having their all-time-high last week, conversions closing on 60% CVR $10 Payout) and EPC $2.8 on $32 payout. HOT - ED Telehealth is hard, ED makes it less hard (pun intended). our ED offer is showing great growing trends with weekly EPC at $5.5+ HOT - Home Warranty / HELOC Grouping them together as they are similar in performance, EPC $3+, stable growing …

🔥2❤1

2 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC812 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Mobile App - Rewards (Play to earn) - Ad Pack updated, Buyer identified top ads for US - along with many others ready to launch.

🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC797 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

New Offer VSL Nutra + lander ready (no need to reupload) + ads ready (grab the performers or make your own) Ready to test? Drop us a DM with 1. Main traffic source 2. Verticals that you are typically running 3. average monthly adspend in USD @foundme00

🔥1

29 Jun 2026, 20:32 UTC831 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NEW rewards mobile app, - internal tests -> great - play games -> get money angle - ads - done for you DM @foundme00

🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 07:24 UTC903 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Those of you who wanted to test this out, offer is ready for a starting test. (After that, NO caps, ANY traffic accepted.) 24/7/7 DM @foundme00

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @growramp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jun 2026, 16:18 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

$0.7 CPA, 1st Page Submit Offer

  1. Would Test / Run86%
  2. Not Interested14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jun 2026, 06:46 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

I am going to attend:

  1. ATO Barcelona43%
  2. ASE New York68%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Growramp News” (@growramp), 1,050 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/growramp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.