👨🏻🔬 Тестируем продукты с помощью холл-тестов
👨🏻💻 Обзоры на основе слепых тестов
Наш уютный чатик тут: t.me/grey_ugli_chat
Есть вопрос? Пиши
@ifeeddog
@korolevsergey1001
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,758–4,760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 17:58
4,760
+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:45
4,758
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 4,760 subscribers
Avg views / post
875
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
7 (6 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
4,376
Reactions total
103
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,920
Videos
≈283
Links
≈1,310
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
38
27.7%
custom 5253684209276435273
35
25.5%
❤
34
24.8%
👍
13
9.49%
👏
5
3.65%
💘
4
2.92%
❤🔥
2
1.46%
custom 5456318008932703042
1
0.73%
👀
1
0.73%
💋
1
0.73%
😁
1
0.73%
🤝
1
0.73%
🤩
1
0.73%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 7 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grey_ugli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мы вам с любовью из Удмуртии принесли 2 вещицы!
1️⃣ Италмас - новый вкус в ароматической линейке Догмы. На JC его показали, теперь официальный старт продаж.
Официальное описание аромата:
Аромат жёлтых медовых цветов прямиком с весенних полей.
Мы на JC успели 3 банки зацепить, больше 200гр уже ушло, можем смело сказать - вкусно 👍🏻
Тут действительно много мёда фоном, а на первом плане жёлтые и белые цветы. Аромат цв…
А теперь планы Догмы на ближайшее время!
Новые парфюмы:
- Диптик Ленте
- Цедрат Бозе
- Авентус
- Альтаир
Там ещё и ещё будет, но Догмовцы не хотят топить активно - розница чутка сложно воспринимает парфюмку, поэтому ей сейчас будут менять этикетку по дизайну - сделают в стиле самих парфюмов.
Новая неароматика:
Любителям моносортов наконец-то завезут крыпышей (на фото), сигарщиков скоро ждёт Bentley тиражом чуть мен…
Экскурсия на завод Догмы со спойлерами!
Провёл её Игорь - один из отцов-основателей и технолог бренда, так что вас ждёт максимально полный рассказ - больше часа!
Так начался Третий Съезд Друзей Догмы 👋🏻
Что внутри?
- Как производится Догма: весь процесс
- Какой бленд сейчас в ароматической Догме?
- Как варят сигары?
- Почему сердце производства обшито фанерой?
- Зачем на сухие сигары вешают антикварные часы?
И, ко…
HOOK Лесная черника
Вновь у нас на обзоре дискуссионный аромат. В этот раз мы можем увидеть, что нет большого количества мыла.
Однако есть проблемы с жёсткостью аромата, дискомфорт при курении ощущается.
Сама черника, при всех этих нюансах, присутствует во вкусе довольно активно. У неё неплохая яркость и узнаваемость.
Есть некоторые отклонения в сторону смежных профилей вкуса, и, некоторые отталкивающие векторы.
…
Ровно 20 дней без постов! Мы решили, что нужно иногда быть ГУ из 2021 с постами раз в месяц.
Отгремел Фестиваль в Русском стиле, но ребята из Blansh готовили вас к нему заранее, ведь нет ничего более ностальгического, чем варёная кукуруза.
BLANSH Варёная кукуруза
В целом, что тут говорить, попадание во вкус имеется. Как выразился один из наших фокусников «есть пробитие».
Аромат не простой, на самом деле, тут чувс…
Догма Ижевика
Громких сенсаций не будет, самый важный пункт проверку не прошёл. Аромат оказался с мылом.
Правда с небольшим, вот не получилось сделать совсем без него, как ни крути оно будет.
И да, догма изменилась, сырьё стало намного лучше воспринимать температуру и держать жар. Ароматизаторы стойкие. Всё гуд.
У этой ежевики даже с яркостью вкуса нет проблем. База не лезет вперёд, всё в целом работает.
И ягодн…
Сарма х Гайд Черёмуха
Ягодная прелесть, наверное так можно назвать этот аромат, потому что в нём всё так хорошо и прикольно, кроме одного.
Вот это одно «но» мешает завершить разбор аромата одним абзацем.
Ведь аромат назвали черёмуха, а её никто не нашел, может и не знал какая она на вкус, а может просто не помнил, непонятно.
Понятно только то, что это цветочно-ягодный аромат без мыла и дискомфорта.
Он отлично ра…
custom 52536842092764352737❤2❤🔥2👏1💘1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @grey_ugli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 241,298 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Грей угли!” (@grey_ugli), 4,760 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grey_ugli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
