Channel
@greenpeace_esp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,304subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001035185800 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @greenpeace_esp |
| Created | 29 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/greenpeace_esp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 1,304 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 1,302 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 1,301 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 1,300 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 1,301 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 1,301 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 April 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 613 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🔴 ACCIÓN EN EL CONGRESO: LA INACCIÓN POLÍTICA NOS MATA 🔥Tras semanas sufriendo un incendio tras otro, con 14 personas fallecidas, 90.000 desplazadas y una superficie quemada seis veces superior al mismo periodo de 2025, estamos en el Congreso de los Diputados para exigirles: ✋ NO QUEREMOS VER NUESTRO PAÍS ARDER ‼️¿Qué más tiene que pasar para que nuestra clase política actúa al nivel que necesita España? https://…
https://es.greenpeace.org/es/noticias/no-quiero-ver-mi-pais-arder/
🪼 NUEVO INFORME🪼 ¡Tiramos dinero al mar! Concretamente, 246 millones de euros este año. Las cosas deben hacerse de otra manera!
Prolongar la agonía de las nucleares solo es un negocio para Iberdrola, Naturgy y Endesa: supone un coste de más 3.800 MILLONES DE EUROS en la factura de la luz, más años de residuos radiactivos, y un aumento de emisiones porque frenará las renovables lo que obligará disparar la quema de gas.
Ayúdanos a proteger la naturaleza de Tenerife: https://go.greenpeace.es/4vwMvdG
Suma tu voz: https://go.greenpeace.es/4g08N2I
Fuimos a ver, un año después, las zonas calcinadas por los incendios más grandes de la historia de España: las zonas arrasadas en el "Triángulo del fuego" (León, Zamora, Ourense). Encontramos pueblos que dependieron de sí mismos, vecinos que apagaron el fuego con sus propias manos. 👉Un dato clave: Solo el 0,77% de los incendios causó el 86% de la superficie quemada. La solución está en la gestión forestal durante t…
Video, posted without a caption
🔴INVESTIGACIÓN🔴 Documentamos la actividad ILEGAL del palangrero español 'Naboeiro', capturando especies NO permitidas de tiburón y CORTANDO SUS ALETAS. El barco faenaba en una zona que debería ser un SANTUARIO de protección PRIORITARIA. En este Día de los Océanos, ¡BASTA DE IMPUNIDAD EN ALTA MAR!
🔴 ACCIÓN 🔴 Desplegamos en el icónico 📍Park Güell de Barcelona una viñeta gigante cedida por la viñetista Flavita Banana en el Día Mundial del Medio Ambiente. Lo reivindicamos: el ecologismo y la movilización social son necesarias para proteger un planeta atravesado por la crisis climática. Y tú ¿de qué equipo eres? Feliz Día Mundial del Medio Ambiente 🌳
ℹ️ Hoy, 4 de junio, es el día de la sobrecapacidad en España y el Spanish way of life ha hecho catacrack: hemos consumido todos los recursos naturales que el planeta es capaz de regenerar en un año. Como no tenemos ni búnker de lujo ni planeta Marte al que escapar, escucha a la creadora de contenido Estela Ortiz (@kkiilllljjooyy en Instagram) como vivir la ecotopía más realista
AZNALCÓLLAR, OTRA VEZ NO
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @greenpeace_esp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 953,595 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@greenpeace_esp named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Greenpeace_esp” (@greenpeace_esp), 1,304 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greenpeace_esp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.