5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,976–2,984 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:38
2,977
-2
10 Aug 2026, 20:45
2,979
-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:01
2,982
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:46
2,983
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:33
2,983
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 20 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
47s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
508 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5330380677231697749
252
49.6%
custom 5330279109845082931
79
15.6%
custom 5330188954186573493
78
15.4%
❤
68
13.4%
🔥
20
3.94%
😐
4
0.787%
😡
3
0.591%
🤣
3
0.591%
👍
1
0.197%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 508reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 6 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @great_around_us. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 December 2025 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пока меня тут не было, все успели запретить телегу, устроить панику, перейти в Макс, вернуться обратно, словить жесточайший хайп по вайбкодингу, устать от вайбкодинга, словить паничку от вайбкодинга и так далее. Короче, несколько месяцев всего, а сколько всякого было.
У меня за это время родилось в работе несколько проектов прекрасных, пришел делиться одним из них.
У нас в Пэе и Сплите можно себе пластиковую карту …
💥 Figma вчера раскатила слоты. Вкратце – упрощает работу с компонентами, которые повторяются – всякие списки, карусельки и проч. Раньше надо было детачить или как-то костылить, теперь внутри слотов можно гибко добавлять или менять между собой местами компоненты.
Короче с точки зрения работы с дизайн-системами — огромное величие, ждали этого долго.
В карточках — то как это юзать. Есть нюансы, которые не очевидны, ти…
🍫 Лавка бахнула новый раздел с возможностью утилизировать монетки.
Не хочется углубляться в рассуждения о механике — это уже какой-то рыночный стандарт, в котором разные продукты работают со средним чеком с помощью внутренних бонусов.
Я тут скорее увидел хороший пример того, как можно системно работать с инфографикой, когда надо впихивать разную информацию на небольшую площадь.
Бейджи работают друг с другом – в за…
Прерывать молчание в канале стоит хотя бы ради таких проектов.
В 24 году 100 дизов Яндекса нарисовали обложки к классическим произведениям. Был крутейший проект и эти обложки до сих пор живут в цифровом виде в аппке Яндекс Книг.
В 2025 я услышал, что проект запускают снова, и вписался. Снова 100 дизов Яндекса, снова 100 книг (но уже скорее современных бестселлеров, нежели классических). И в этот раз помимо цифровых…
Продолжаю рассказывать про подходы к вайбкодингу.
Приложение написать в нейронке – это конечно класс, но я тут впервые повайбкодил для оффлайн-штуки.
Увидел на просторах пинтереста как в рамку вставляют небольшое чб-фото, выглядит стилево.
Подумал, что печатное фото супер, но экран там смотрелся бы круче.
LCD сразу мимо, потому что без розетки это проживет не долго, поэтому e-ink, там изображение хранится условно…
Вообще, по-настоящему в сердечко конечно попал проект от ребят из Пэя, которые решили не мелочиться и дали возможность пользователям самим выбирать, как выглядит иконка аппки в этот раз.
Отдельный респект за тексты, «Иконька» – это очень хорошо 🥳
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @great_around_us. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 558,671 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“О величии в дизайне и продукте” (@great_around_us), 2,977 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/great_around_us.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
