Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مهدی راد | آپشن

Channel

مهدی راد | آپشن

@goodMarkets_OP

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,101subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001923017322
TypeChannel
Username@goodMarkets_OP
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/goodMarkets_OP

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,0219,1359,0787 August 2026 — 9,099 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,099 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,095 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,090 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,082 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,078 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,067 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,064 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,059 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,051 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,040 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,021 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,115 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,135 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,110 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,101 subscribers9,1017 August 20265 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 59 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,004–9,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 19:399,101-9
28 Sept 2026, 04:179,110-25
18 Sept 2026, 04:399,135+20
13 Sept 2026, 16:179,115+94
10 Sept 2026, 05:019,021-19
4 Sept 2026, 17:179,040-11
1 Sept 2026, 03:079,051-8
29 Aug 2026, 06:349,059-5
26 Aug 2026, 15:239,064-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:379,067-11
20 Aug 2026, 12:529,078-4
17 Aug 2026, 19:269,082-8
14 Aug 2026, 13:549,090-5
10 Aug 2026, 21:519,095-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:169,099no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:099,099first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7,469 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,469100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,469 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goodMarkets_OP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 November 2025 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈4,980 views181 reactionsread 28 August 2026

چه کسانی با این پست (اینجا) شروع به گرفتن پوزیشن خرید اختیارفروش کردند؟ 👍 @goodMarkets_OP

👍181

15 Jun 2026, 15:29 UTC≈9,270 views1,490 reactions3 Starsread 28 August 2026

فعالیت مجدد کانال ؟ 👍 @goodMarkets_OP

👍1,490

19 May 2026, 13:51 UTC≈13,100 views134 reactionsread 28 August 2026

شخصا دسترسی نداشتم به خاطر وضعیت اینترنت و نتونستنم خودم تایید کنم اما بعضی دوستان اطلاع دادند نمادهای با سررسید اسفند که 30 اردیبهشت اعمال میشوند، با 100 تا 300% مثبت باز شدند. شاید انتظارها به سمت چند هزار درصد بود و مشابه اتفاقات چند ماه قبل (مثل این پست) اما بدلایل زیادی مثل تکراری شدن اتفاق (یعنی بازار تا حدودی انتظار جنگ را داشت)، عدم بازگشایی نمادهای زیادی در بازار اصلی (که باعث شد فشار فروش گسترده ایجاد نشود …

👍134

18 May 2026, 17:23 UTC≈11,300 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ببنیم فردا با چند صد و چه بسا با چند هزار درصد رشد، اختیار فروش‌ها معامله می‌شوند ... ظاهرا فردا نه فقط سمت فروش بلکه سمت خرید آپشن‌ها برای موقعیت فزاینده بسته است. این باعث تنش بیشتر میشود. از این دستکاری‌ها دست بردارید! @goodMarkets_OP

👍75

11 Mar 2026, 20:15 UTC≈11,600 views49 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026

اگر با این پست اختیارفروش خریدید، احتمالا بعد از بازگشایی بازار ... سود بسیار بالایی میکنید. این اتفاق مشابه سود نجومی است که اختیار فروش‌ها بعد از جنگ ۱۲ روزه داد. به عنوان مثال این پست (اینجا) را ببینید. @goodMarkets_OP

👍49

24 Feb 2026, 18:00 UTC≈13,100 views187 reactionsread 28 August 2026

تقریبا همه کسانی که پیام دادند به غیر از یک نفر، جواب اشتباه دادند. علت موضوعی که در پست ریپلای‌شده مطرح کردم در خود پست هست. در حقیقت جمله کوت شده اشتباه هست! معامله‌گران آپشن‌ها قیمت سهام رو پیش‌بینی نمی‌کنند! در حقیقت چه اختیار خرید و چه اختیار فروش، یک ابزار پوشش ریسک هست (یا همان بیمه سهام که میگن). پوشش دادن هر ریسکی هم هزینه ای داره و این هزینه همان پرمیوم آپشن‌هاست که در زمان خرید برایشان هزینه میکنید. باز…

👍187

23 Feb 2026, 20:51 UTC≈9,550 views130 reactionsread 28 August 2026

خب حالا که فکر کردید، جوابتون رو به بات زیر بفرستید: @goodMarkets_OPbot ‌

👍130

23 Feb 2026, 20:50 UTC≈10,100 views172 reactionsread 28 August 2026

بنظر زمان خیلی خوبی این هشدار رو دادم چرا که بازار مثبت شد و اختیارفروش‌ها عمدتا منفی شدند‌. با بررسی روزانه بازار احتمالا بشه در مقاومت‌ها اختیارفروش خرید برای یک نوسان کوچک. دقت کنید بارها هشدار دادم در آپشن با سرمایه بسیار کوچک معامله کنید: حداکثر ۵٪ از سرمایه @goodMarkets_OP

👍172

22 Feb 2026, 16:10 UTC≈11,100 views298 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026

قیمت امروز دو آپشن زیر رو ببینید: ضهرم0132 آخرین قیمت 380 تومان طهرم0132 آخرین قیمت 304 تومان قیمت اعمال و تاریخ اعمال هر دو 2800 تومان و 26/1/1405 هست. به عبارت دیگه، این دو اپشن به نوعی دارند قیمت اهرم رو در تاریخ ۲۶ فروردین پیش‌بینی می‌کنند (یا به بیان ساده‌تر این انتظار معامله‌گران هست). اما نکته جالب این هست که مثلا معامله‌گران ضهرم که با پرمیوم ۳۸۰ تومانی ضهرم میخرند مثل این هست که بگن پیش‌بینی ما از قیمت اه…

👍298

20 Feb 2026, 12:34 UTC≈15,400 views468 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026

جو روانی بدلیل ترس از جنگ منفی است اما این دلیل نمیشه بدون تحلیل و بی‌گدار، اختیارفروش بخرید ... تاکنون سهام بازار و صندوق‌های اهرمی اصلاح نسبتا خوبی داشتند اما اینکه بخواید وسط روند که ممکنه اخرش نزدیک باشه، روی ادامه‌دار بودنش شرط ببندید، پر ریسک هست. دقت کنید بر اساس توضیحات و آموزش‌هایی که قبلا در همین کانال دادم، آپشن‌ها دقیقا مشابه سهام رفتار نمی‌کنند. مثلا اگر قرار باشه فردا اهرم منفی ۳ بزنه، دلیل نمیشه فردا …

👍468

27 Nov 2025, 16:25 UTC≈16,000 views586 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

حالا که مفاهیم اصلی رو آموزش دادیم در کانال میتونیم به این سوال پاسخ نسبتا مناسب بدیم. این سوال در اصل اینه: فرض کن روند آینده دارایی پایه رو تحلیل کردم؛ حالا کدوم قرارداد رو انتخاب کنم؟ جواب کوتاه: بستگی به استراتژی شما داره! قراردادهای اختیارمعامله دو مشخصه دارند ۱. تاریخ سررسید ۲. قیمت اعمال. پس انتخاب قرارداد یعنی انتخاب سررسید و قیمت اعمال مناسب اول به چند نکته دقت کنید: فرض کنید شما خودرو رو تحلیل کردید و پ…

👍586

14 Nov 2025, 17:39 UTC≈15,300 views428 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

پرمیوم (Premium) به قیمت اختیارخرید یا اختیارفروش پرمیوم هم گفته می‌شود. دقت کنید ارزش ذاتی، ITM یا OTM بودن یک قرارداد هیچ ارتباطی با پرمیوم آن ندارد و کاملا وابسته به تنها دو عامل است: قیمت اعمال و قیمت لحظه‌ای دارایی پایه همچنین هدف نوسان‌گیری در آپشن‌ها، درواقع خرید در پرمیوم پایین و فروش در پریمیوم بالاتر هست. این مطلب #آموزشی مفید بود؟ 👍 @goodMarkets_OP

👍428

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @goodMarkets_OP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مهدی راد | آپشن” (@goodMarkets_OP), 9,101 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodMarkets_OP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.