Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 杭州宫颜群【免费上榜】

Supergroup

杭州宫颜群【免费上榜】

@gong8228

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

10,388members

+4,006 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026

513 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003781141256
TypeSupergroup
Username@gong8228
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/gong8228

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,38210,5028,44226 September 2026 — 6,382 members4 October 2026 — 8,350 members10 October 2026 — 9,893 members14 October 2026 — 10,502 members15 October 2026 — 10,495 members16 October 2026 — 10,493 members17 October 2026 — 10,469 members18 October 2026 — 10,430 members19 October 2026 — 10,367 members20 October 2026 — 10,316 members21 October 2026 — 10,261 members22 October 2026 — 10,226 members23 October 2026 — 10,405 members25 October 2026 — 10,388 members10,38826 September 202625 October 2026
14 measurements spanning 28 days, net +4,006. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,764–11,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
25 Oct 2026, 00:5610,388-17
23 Oct 2026, 21:2110,405+179
22 Oct 2026, 23:0010,226-35
21 Oct 2026, 22:0910,261-55
20 Oct 2026, 16:5110,316-51
19 Oct 2026, 16:4910,367-63
18 Oct 2026, 14:4610,430-39
17 Oct 2026, 15:5710,469-24
16 Oct 2026, 13:1610,493-2
15 Oct 2026, 10:2010,495-7
14 Oct 2026, 08:5810,502+609
10 Oct 2026, 20:559,893+1,543
4 Oct 2026, 13:178,350+1,968
26 Sept 2026, 16:186,382first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“杭州宫颜群【免费上榜】” (@gong8228), 10,388 members as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gong8228.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.