Channel
@gollvazheha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,780subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001492471437 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gollvazheha |
| Created | Between 1 July 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gollvazheha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 6,780 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 6,773 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 6,777 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:40 | 6,782 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 6,782 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (27 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,032 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
40 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 30.0% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❌فال رایگان برای کسانیکه کات کرده ان ❌ سرکتاب فال دقیق تاریخ ازدواج و بازگشت معشوق👇👇👇 https://t.me/fall_taaroot https://t.me/fall_taaroot فال مثلثی و انواع فالهای جدید👆👆👆 0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣ مجموعه ای از بهترین های تلگرام 👇👇 https://t.me/addlist/-FBdd0f_EQswM2Vk https://t.me/addlist/-FBdd0f_EQswM2Vk کلیک کنید 👆👆
Signed لیلی
#محمد_زارع #رو_درودیواراے_این_شهر خیلی وقته ڪه با جاےِ خالیِ تـو ڪنار آمده ام، اماااااا هنوز حسرتِ اون “حالِ خوبِ” بینمون رو میخورم، ڪه دیگه هیچوقت بـرنمیگرده:)
❤2
Signed 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚢𝚊𝚖
از آن ڪه بین رقیبان مرا شناختــ ولی بہ طعنہ از همہ پرسید ڪیستــ ! بیزارم! #فاضل_نظری
Signed ˚⋆｡⋆s𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒉
تووو تنها اتفاق خوبــ ِ دنیاے منی اما تو هم اے عشق با تنهاییام بڪَذار تنهایم #فاضل_نظری
Signed ˚⋆｡⋆s𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒉
با خیالت زندگی می ڪنم و با خودت عاشقی، ڪاش دو بار زاده می شدم؛ یڪی براے مردن در آغوش تـو، یڪی براے تماشاے عاشقی ڪردنت..! #عباس_معروفی
Signed 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚢𝚊𝚖
خانه ےِ قلبم خراب از یڪّه تازے هاےِ تـوست عشق بازے ڪن ڪه وقت عشق بازے هاےِ تـوست...!!! #فاضل_نظرے
Signed 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚢𝚊𝚖
. گـرچه همه چیز می گذرد، اماااااا آدم تا همیشه براےِ برخی اتفاقات غمگین میماند.👌💔
👌2
Signed ؏قیـٖق
میآمد یار مست و تنهااا تنهااا با نـرگس پرخمار رعنااا رعنااا جستم ڪه یڪی بوسه ستانم زِ لبش فـریاد برآورد ڪه یغمااا یغمااا #مولانااا
Signed ؏قیـٖق
قلم در دست مانده ام ڪه دگـر چه بنویسم در وصف این همه دلتنگی ڪه پاسخش فقط لبخندے ســــــرد نباشد ... #تابستان1405
Signed 🎀 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒔 🎀
سنگین میگذرد این روزهایم هر نفس یڪ عمر ... .
Signed 🎀 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒔 🎀
به تنهایی ام بیــا هـزار لبخنـد خـاموش پشت دژ لبـانم منتظـر نگاه #تـوست.... #مستــانه_دادگــر
❤1
Signed 🎀 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒔 🎀
همچو یڪ ساز در آغوشمی مینوازمت نرم و آرام در نفس هایت میچرخم و لایه لایه اوج میگیرم... #عباس_معروفی
🔥1
Signed 🎀 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒔 🎀
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @gollvazheha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 192,081 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⊰•⊱گلـواژه هاےِمانـدگار⊰•⊱” (@gollvazheha), 6,780 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gollvazheha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.