Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы | Glory Shop

Channel

Отзывы | Glory Shop

@glory_otz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

866subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001888935925
TypeChannel
Username@glory_otz
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glory_otz

Growth

797866831.57 August 2026 — 797 subscribers8 August 2026 — 797 subscribers8 August 2026 — 798 subscribers16 August 2026 — 824 subscribers25 August 2026 — 866 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 787–876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 02:09866+42
16 Aug 2026, 20:02824+26
8 Aug 2026, 08:14798+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:36797no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:46797first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

244 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15061.5%
custom 52627172427594630118936.5%
🔥52.05%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 17 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Nov 2023, 09:47 UTC≈24,800 views189 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❤️ Под этим постом покупатели могут оставить свой отзыв о покупке Glory SHOP | Qwerty123

100custom 526271724275946301189

17 Nov 2023, 09:36 UTC≈24,600 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо большое продавцу! Чел реально хорош. Даже с моими затупами помог мне все установить. Покупайте личные сертификаты, чтобы сэкономить себе нервы и деньги. Спасибо!

32

16 Nov 2023, 22:20 UTC≈24,400 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отзыв Сертификат работает, ждал около 4 дней, регистрация и установка лёгкая ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

7🔥5

14 Nov 2023, 12:28 UTC≈19,600 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сертификат топ, всё сделал за 5 мин и теперь сижу в новом тт. Всем советую брать сертификат именно тут!!!!

8

11 Nov 2023, 08:16 UTC≈14,500 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

всё, я сделала!! спасибо Вам огромное ❤️ никогда не думала, что буду так радоваться новому тт)

2

10 Nov 2023, 15:07 UTC≈12,600 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сертификат получил, прошло ровно 3-дня и все готово, спасибо вам большое, сейчас с кайфом пользуюсь тик током, и не думаю о том что он может слететь в ближайшие время, всем советую приобрести сертификат, еще раз спасибо ☺️💪🏿

9 Nov 2023, 14:16 UTC≈10,200 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ура, все получилось Спасибо большое!

7 Nov 2023, 10:49 UTC≈9,180 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Все работает великолепно, спасибо тебе огромное💕😧

6 Nov 2023, 15:14 UTC≈8,370 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

о, все отлично! спасибо!!

2 Nov 2023, 20:32 UTC≈7,830 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

спасибо большое что помог,все работает, просто имба!!!!

30 Oct 2023, 20:29 UTC≈6,900 viewsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо большое! Все получилось, помощь очень быстрая и понятная при необходимости😅. Ждала сам сертификат недолго - ровно три дня, как и было обещано. Все супер!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @glory_otz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 369,410 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы | Glory Shop” (@glory_otz), 866 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glory_otz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.