These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
127 average views per post against 28,989 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.438%. Across the 24,770 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.57% and 22.3%, with a median of 11.3%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (7 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Posts measured
75 of 76 published in the window (75 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
9,520
Mature posts only
0.447% over 73 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 6 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net -1,308. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,734–30,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 11:55
28,930
-59
4 Sept 2026, 01:02
28,989
-35
2 Sept 2026, 18:23
29,024
-39
1 Sept 2026, 14:08
29,063
-44
31 Aug 2026, 13:48
29,107
-70
30 Aug 2026, 10:24
29,177
-47
29 Aug 2026, 13:25
29,224
-51
28 Aug 2026, 12:43
29,275
-27
27 Aug 2026, 16:04
29,302
-43
26 Aug 2026, 19:13
29,345
-44
25 Aug 2026, 21:44
29,389
-23
25 Aug 2026, 01:08
29,412
-100
23 Aug 2026, 10:57
29,512
-76
21 Aug 2026, 19:55
29,588
-53
20 Aug 2026, 19:34
29,641
-53
19 Aug 2026, 19:06
29,694
-41
18 Aug 2026, 19:25
29,735
-30
17 Aug 2026, 19:53
29,765
-53
16 Aug 2026, 15:17
29,818
-73
14 Aug 2026, 23:07
29,891
first reading
Engagement
93 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.437%
avg views ÷ 28,930 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.563%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 93 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held
93 (3 August 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total
9,348
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10
62.5%
custom 5359284479988882181
3
18.8%
custom 5411321187055724030
3
18.8%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 Способы заработка в телеге
— Вот вам топ 2 способа зарабатывать в телеге, не имея практически никакого опыта и навыков
1️⃣ Креативщик
~ Тут самое важное уметь красиво писать текст, креативщик за деньги пишет рекламные посты для телеграм каналов
— Его главная задача завлечь людей в канал всего лишь одним постом, в нем он должен в лучшем свете описать о чем рассказывает этот тгк
Один креатив (специальный рекламны…
✅📺 Зарабатываем на персонализированных планах питания и тренировок от ИИ
Суть схемы: Создавайте индивидуальные планы питания и тренировок для клиентов, учитывая их цели (похудение, набор массы, улучшение здоровья), предпочтения в еде, аллергии и уровень физической подготовки. Нейросети делают это быстро и эффективно.
Что делаем:
⃣ Инструменты:
—— ChatGPT 5.4 / Gemini 3.1 Pro (через /settings) — для генерации планов…
😬 Схема с токенами – это одна из тех тем, где вообще не нужно разбираться и долго сидеть
Открыл мануал → сделал как написано → выводишь прибыль
По факту ничего не нужно, кроме телефона и твоего желания. Поэтому не тупи, действуй 👇
Схема с токенами: https://telegra.ph/Legkij-i-bystryj-zarabotok-na-CHAT-GPT-Ot-3700-do-9300-s-kruga-do-5-minut-07-30
❓ Есть вопросы? Пиши сюда »ЛС«
🖥 У МЕНЯ К ВАМ ОДИН ВОПРОС
Почему люди так любят все усложнять?
Иногда читаю лс и накатывает ощущение, что человек придумал себе 20 проблем еще до первого запуска и просто хочет вынести тебе мозг тупыми вопросами.
Хотя, конечно, чел со скрина скорее всего просто попрошайка, который по итогу все равно не сделает что-то сам и проебет время, когда мог бы заработать 💩
⬇️Схема с токенами⬇️
https://telegra.ph/Legkij-i-…
Пассивный заработок 🤑
Заметил давно, что некоторые схемы называют пассивным доходом, хотя все равно нужно каждый день что-то делать. Проверять, загружать и тд.
❌ Здесь после настройки не нужно ничего. Сервер сам выполняет вычисления, сам получает вознаграждение. А тебе нужно заходить только для того, чтобы вывести кэш.
Попробовать действительно пассивный заработок: https://telegra.ph/Zarabatyvaem-na-majning-server…
💻 Самая профитная схема в канале
У нас очень много разных тем, но схема с токенами остается одной из самых понятных и быстрых.
Потому что она вообще не требует специальных навыков и времени, а профит при этом там вполне ощутимый 🤦♂️
Сама схема 👇
https://telegra.ph/Legkij-i-bystryj-zarabotok-na-CHAT-GPT-Ot-3700-do-9300-s-kruga-do-5-minut-07-30
❓ Есть вопросы? Пиши сюда »ЛС«
💳 44К С ПЕРВОГО КРУГА
Схема с абузом продолжает доказывать свою эффективность. Подписчик только начал и и сразу получил наглядный результат.
Когда механика продумана до мелочей, а инструкция составлена понятно - всё, что остаётся, это действовать ⛏
Первый результат приходит быстро и становится лучшей мотивацией для продолжения.
Та самая схема:
➡️ https://telegra.ph/Zarabotok-na-teme-s-forumov---ot-8000-do-50000-r…
🔥 Новый плюс по токенам
Многие уже зарабатывают на перепродаже токенов, пока ты продолжаешь просто читать посты.
Вот недавно в лс прилетел очередной скрин. Схема сама по себе очень легкая, и ты сможешь также забрать 28к всего за день!
Прочитать мануал ➡️ https://telegra.ph/Legkij-i-bystryj-zarabotok-na-CHAT-GPT-Ot-3700-do-9300-s-kruga-do-5-minut-07-30
❓ Есть вопросы? Пиши сюда »ЛС«
🤔 Майнинг звучит сложно
Серверы, вычисления, сети. И многие думают: «Это не для меня».
Подписчик ничего не понимает в серверах. Вообще. Он открыл мануал, сделал все по шагам, как по инструкции. Сервер запустился, деньги пошли 👍
Не нужно быть экспертом, нужно просто уметь читать.
Ссылка на мануал ➡️ https://telegra.ph/Zarabatyvaem-na-majning-serverah-08-12-3
❓ Есть вопросы? Пиши сюда »ЛС«
💎 СХЕМА С ТОКЕНАМИ CHATGPT
Звучит сложно из-за использования ИИ в схеме, однако это не так 🤷♂️
Суть схемы в обычной перепродаже, и даже в сам ChatGPT заходить не надо. Только купить в одном месте и продать в другом. Все.
🍀 Начать перепродавать токены: https://telegra.ph/Legkij-i-bystryj-zarabotok-na-CHAT-GPT-Ot-3700-do-9300-s-kruga-do-5-minut-07-30
❓ Есть вопросы? Пиши сюда »ЛС«
🍀 3.700₽ С КАЖДОГО КРУГА
Чистыми 2.200₽. В день можно делать неограниченное количество кругов, но даже сделав десять – уже +22к в кармане.
А теперь представьте, сколько может выйти за месяц плотной работы со схемой. Сумма выходит далеко не маленькой 🔭
💻 Прочитать схему: https://telegra.ph/Legkij-i-bystryj-zarabotok-na-CHAT-GPT-Ot-3700-do-9300-s-kruga-do-5-minut-07-30
❓ Есть вопросы? Пиши сюда »ЛС«
🤑 Результат за два часа
Мой подписчик засек время, которое он сегодня потратил на схему с токенами – два часа неспешной работы и результат в 45к рублей.
☕️ Всего за пару часов на этой теме можно сделать месячную зарплату обычного работяги. Теперь представьте, сколько можно заработать за целый день или за месяц.
Начать работать по схеме: https://telegra.ph/Legkij-i-bystryj-zarabotok-na-CHAT-GPT-Ot-3700-do-9300-s-kr…
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @giftskrem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💶 АБУZZЕР | теmки” (@giftskrem), 28,930 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giftskrem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.