10 measurements spanning 24 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,959–3,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 06:53
2,968
-9
27 Aug 2026, 20:27
2,977
-14
24 Aug 2026, 12:37
2,991
-4
20 Aug 2026, 14:43
2,995
-6
17 Aug 2026, 22:03
3,001
-7
14 Aug 2026, 17:47
3,008
-7
11 Aug 2026, 15:16
3,015
-11
8 Aug 2026, 10:56
3,026
-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:32
3,027
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:30
3,027
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
427 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
97
22.7%
❤
80
18.7%
🔥
58
13.6%
👏
45
10.5%
😱
44
10.3%
😐
39
9.13%
🤬
28
6.56%
😭
18
4.22%
🤡
13
3.04%
🐳
4
0.937%
🎉
1
0.234%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 26 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎁 Новые гифты - уже скоро?
На тестовом сервере Telegram обнаружено много нововведений, связанных с подарками. Одно из них - необходимость обновить Telegram для отправки подарка.
Ранее, при появлении нововведений (к примеру, лимитов по дате регистрации аккаунта), Telegram обновлять не требовалось.
Источник: @telelakel
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
🎁Ставка за Cozy Galaxy на черном фоне дошла до 206 тысяч долларов
Лидирующую ставку совершил Lucha из команды Portals.
⏲️ До конца аукциона остался 1 час и 20 минут.
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
🎁 Павел Дуров приобрел две Plush Pepe X-Ray разработчикам Telegram
Пепы обошлись павлу в 44 тысячи долларов и были куплены через Telegram Market
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
🎁 Стартовал аукцион на самую редкую Plush Pepe!
Самая редкая комбинация среди подарков - Cozy Galaxy на черном фоне выставлена на аукцион через GetGems.
Первую ставка в этом аукционе (80.000 TON) совершил Lucha из команды Portals.
Ранее этот подарок был выкуплен неизвестным за 100.000$
Как думаете, за сколько уйдет?
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
🎁Слитые модели на медальку
Один из дизайнеров мисскликом опубликовал эмодзи-пак, в котором содержится 19 моделей нового подарка
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
🎁 Корзинка Sping Basket "Meme God" на Onyx Black фоне была продана на Tonnel за 3000 TON
Cебестоимость подарка - 150⭐️ или 1 TON.
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
📈 Модель Fresh Socks «Pepe» запампили с 9.9 до 42 TON
Неизвестный поднял флор на эту модель в 4 раза на всех маркетах. Текущий флор данной модели на Portals - 42 TON
🎁 Себестоимость подарка - 100⭐️ или 0.7 TON. 60х чистого профита.
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
🎁 2 часа назад золотая Plush Pepe была продана за 23 585 TON (52280$)
Не смотря на падение TON - редкие модели не упали в цене и имеют привязку к доллару.
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
📊Цена на аренду подарков снизилась 2 раза
В конце прошлой недели стоимость аренды 🎁 Plush Pepe составляла 10 TON (сейчас - 4 TON)
Цена на аренду 🎁 Heart Locket так же упала с 4 TON до 1 TON в сутки.
➕ Gift Digest
📄 Полезная информация
👍15❤11😱5🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gifts_digest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@gifts_digest named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pauldurovskam named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gift Digest” (@gifts_digest), 2,968 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gifts_digest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.