Channel
@gicconf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
880subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003973118723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gicconf |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gicconf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 880 | +20 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 860 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 860 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,562 |
| Reactions total | 63 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
63 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350646480417875833 | 11 | 17.5% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5222378742411731670 | 10 | 15.9% | |
| custom 6230971010657553508 | 9 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5219926775647208960 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| custom 6230834155819633457 | 5 | 7.94% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 6.35% | |
| custom 6231040941315066501 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| custom 5283231544163447395 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.59% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
нет, это не ****. мы не одобряем сумасбродные голосования между людьми за роль кого-то там. только нереальные персы, только ради хихи хаха. никаких тут итогов с реальными челами не будет!!!!
custom 62308341558196334573❤2❤🔥1custom 62309710106575535081
Signed äfex
ПОЯСНЯЮ🙄 К примеру, возьмем 6 персонажей: Эола, Шень Хэ, Кинич, Чжун Ли, Сяо, Венти. Устраиваем голосование, где вписываем имя наших конкурентов😍 Люди голосуют и по итогу вылетает тот, кто набрал меньше всего голосов. И так раз за разом, пока мы не обнажурим главного фаворита🧐 сразу укажу, что это все смешинка и для прикола, поэтому не рвем очко друг другу
❤7💔1custom 62309710106575535081
Signed äfex
Кому дольше всех фармили арты? И сколько это было. Моё: Навия, с релиза и по сей день ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
Signed Тейки Гиконф
здравствуйте тут по идеи должно быть 3 сундука - обычный, драгоценный и роскошный я забрала роскошный, но ничего не появилось, даже после того как я перезашла ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
Signed Тейки Гиконф
как вам гонки между фаворитами? если заинтересовало отпишите, я разжую в чем прикол такого интеракта
custom 52223787424117316709😡4custom 62310409413150665012custom 52199267756472089601custom 62309710106575535081
Signed äfex
Кинич❤️ ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
custom 53506464804178758334custom 62308341558196334572custom 62309710106575535082custom 52223787424117316701
Signed Тейки Гиконф
ОБМЕНЯЮ Колумбину 1ШТ ‼️ОМСК‼️ (желательно правый берег) На Тарталью (в приоритете), Сандроне, Дотторе Писать @Durakoza ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
custom 53506464804178758337
Signed Тейки Гиконф
Привет иди нахуй с4 сука ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
custom 52199267756472089606❤1
Signed Тейки Гиконф
у меня есть ахуевший хэдканон на варку который убьёт нас всех.. ну, вернее, это ещё не до конца продуманная теория, я бы по ней работу написала чуть позже. кажется, будто он так хорошо относится к детям/молодым людям в любом городе, потому что у него была жена и ребёнок, которых он не смог спасти в своё время🙌 ЛИБО второй вариант: о нём в детстве не заботились, но вырос он на удивление не социопатичным и не лишённым …
custom 52832315441634473951
Signed Тейки Гиконф
вы видели ЧТО он блять делает рукой кому он там надрачивает ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
Signed Тейки Гиконф
еорм ли идея крутить фурину, если для неё пачки нет?? хочу выбить её по вайфу, 69 круток накоплено, очень хочу её, но даже не знаю, стоит ли, ведь щас и новая Мета(а у меня есть сандроне, и я отказываюсь крутить одетту, но буду данику).. и можно ли собрать фурину в дд?? и как 😞 ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
Signed Тейки Гиконф
какую тиму можно состпвить под коломбину ۫ ᨳ࣪ ִ @gicconfbot ㅤㅤ 、 #тейк | #take 。 @gicconf (´꒳`)♡
❤🔥1
Signed Тейки Гиконф
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @gicconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 22,129 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GICONF [ genshin impact confession ]” (@gicconf), 880 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gicconf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.