Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GIBA TIPSTER

Channel

GIBA TIPSTER

@gibatipster

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

6,494subscribers

-208 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001265277897
TypeChannel
Username@gibatipster
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gibatipster

Growth

6,4946,7026,5986 August 2026 — 6,702 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,698 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,677 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,646 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,616 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,596 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,562 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,547 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,516 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,494 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net -208. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,463–6,733 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 15:456,494-22
30 Aug 2026, 21:446,516-31
27 Aug 2026, 17:526,547-15
24 Aug 2026, 19:076,562-34
20 Aug 2026, 20:556,596-20
17 Aug 2026, 18:176,616-30
14 Aug 2026, 06:156,646-31
10 Aug 2026, 14:516,677-21
7 Aug 2026, 09:306,698-4
6 Aug 2026, 21:336,702first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.47%
avg views ÷ 6,494 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held55 (30 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total4,644
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 26 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3454.0%
👍1117.5%
914.3%
👏711.1%
🥰23.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Inacreditável, mais um dia batendo na trave! ficamos por um canto do tigre que teve um jogador expulso ainda no primeiro tempo e atrapalhou demais!

1

19 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC139 viewsread 20 August 2026

por um cartão do palmeiras, ficariamos só pelo jogo de amanhã 🤯

19 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC175 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

0,10u @101 💰 LINK PRONTO ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

19 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC185 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

0,05u @165 💰 LINK PRONTO ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

🔥2👍1

19 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC184 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

0,10u @135 💰 LINK PRONTO ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

🔥3

19 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC168 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

0,10u @129 🚀 LINK PRONTO ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

🔥21

19 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC158 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

0,10U @51 🚀 LINK PRONTO ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

👍2🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC159 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

0,10U @136 🚀 LINK PRONTO ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

👏2

19 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC135 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

0,10u @69 🚀 LINK PRONTO ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

3🔥2🥰1

19 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC160 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Pessoal, uma dica..uma coisa que gosto de fazer bastante quando são odds altas é dividir a stake do bingo em duas entradas, assim uma deixo para possível cash e outro deixo torrar.. exemplo: se eu for por 100$ no bingo eu divido em 2 entradas de 50$

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @gibatipster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GIBA TIPSTER” (@gibatipster), 6,494 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gibatipster.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.