Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GEORGE SSA

Channel

GEORGE SSA

@georgessa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,932subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004462588443
TypeChannel
Username@georgessa
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/georgessa

Growth

1,9211,9321,926.517 September 2026 — 1,921 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,932 subscribers17 September 202618 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,919–1,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:391,932+11
17 Sept 2026, 03:221,921first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.7%
avg views ÷ 1,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held18 (15 September 202616 September 2026)
Views total21,114
Reactions total1,256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 06s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,256 reactions across 18 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥47738.0%
26020.7%
🤣1179.32%
👍584.62%
👌574.54%
😁423.34%
🏆312.47%
😍231.83%
👀181.43%
🍓171.35%
🍾171.35%
❤‍🔥151.19%
🤝141.11%
🗿131.04%
🍌110.876%
💯110.876%
😱90.717%
🤷‍♂70.557%
🤩60.478%
🙏50.398%
16 further kinds483.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 16:44 UTC548 views32 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Сняли бомбовый ролик,сегодня - завтра будет готово) Ну а бетономешалка по ходу скоро будет в продаже))))) Может надо кому как реклама или место во дворе занять ))))

🔥216😍5

16 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC707 views42 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Поехали снимать ролик с киндеромешалкой Все киндеры будут отдаваться каждому кто улыбнется 😉

😍18🔥12🍓6💯3👀1👍1🦄1

16 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTC824 views51 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

С братиком 🫂😂

🤣36🗿9🐳2💊2🦄2

16 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC895 views39 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

🍾 «ПОЧУВСТВОВАЛ УГРОЗУ» Финал Возместил я, в общем, 20 000 ₽ за разбитое стекло. После этого предметно пообщался с водителем такси и спросил, что именно побудило его так поступить и на что он рассчитывал вообще. Все мы не без греха, и у каждого порой эмоции берут верх, но конкретно в этой ситуации его реакция реально была неоправданной. Сам он объяснил всё просто: почувствовал угрозу. В целом имеет место быть 🤷‍♂️

🤝14🏆11🤣10🤩21🔥1

16 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,000 views57 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

🍾 «ПОЧУВСТВОВАЛ УГРОЗУ» Часть 2 В общем, спокойно уехать не получилось 🤔 Я так сказать стремительно направился к автомобилю такси, чтобы, как это говорится, разрешить сложившуюся ситуацию и понять, чем обусловлен такой негодяйский поступок. 😂 Как оказалось, в салоне был пассажир, ещё и с инвалидностью, которому «Боржоми» чудом не залетело в голову через заднее стекло. На фоне этой новости раскачивать ситуацию дальш

🤣36😱95👀4🤬2😡1

16 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,070 views74 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

🍾«ПОЧУВСТВОВАЛ УГРОЗУ» Часть 1. 🗣 Едем по главной. Вдруг справа из поворота вылетает нечто и вклинивается прямо перед нами. Причём, как выяснилось позже, ещё и с пассажиром. Сигналим. В ответ наш таинственный герой резко оттормаживается прямо перед нами, спокойно выходит из машины, подходит к приоткрытому окну и без единого слова заливает салон перцем 😂 Самое интересное, что из машины к нему даже никто не выходил.

😁37🔥17👀12🤯4🗿2🍓1👍1

16 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,160 views50 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

Тот случай когда бензином можно повыебываться 😂 03:00 ночи. Сейчас по-другому никак конечно 🤷‍♂️

🔥358😁5🤩2

16 Sept 2026, 06:43 UTC≈1,170 views112 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Доброе утро!) Я в ахуе от количества реакций! Всем и каждому спасибо-мы в свою очередь открываем комментари)

👌57🔥14🍌118🤷‍♂7👍6😎3🎃2

15 Sept 2026, 19:36 UTC≈1,250 views278 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

В общем все ясно и понятно Тут будет жизнь и вы сможете проживать её с нами или наблюдать за тем как мы живем! Если пост до утра соберет 100 реакций то мы открываем комментарии))) Всем пока)

143🔥108🍾17👍7🤡3

15 Sept 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,270 views56 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Баня!!! Надо париться только тут,а не по жизни)))) Все щас крайний пост и до завтра !)

🔥438👍5

15 Sept 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,300 views70 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Возвращаюсь в зал,тяжело пиздец после всех этих шаверм и бургеров))))) Я надеюсь в в меня верите))))

36🏆15🔥10🙏5🌭3🗿1

15 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,320 views62 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Еду с Лехой в следующий раз на сво Соберем норм гуманитарку пацанам

👍38💯8💋432🔥2🤩2🫡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @georgessa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GEORGE SSA” (@georgessa), 1,932 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/georgessa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.