Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for English with Henrik🤠

Channel

English with Henrik🤠

@genrikamirian

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,070subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002396210870
TypeChannel
Username@genrikamirian
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/genrikamirian

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0621,1091,085.57 August 2026 — 1,109 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,109 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,107 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,096 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,089 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,094 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,092 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,087 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,082 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,080 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,072 subscribers29 September 2026 — 1,066 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,062 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,070 subscribers1,0707 August 202612 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 66 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,055–1,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 22:481,070+8
6 Oct 2026, 15:391,062-4
29 Sept 2026, 08:171,066-6
18 Sept 2026, 21:171,072-8
14 Sept 2026, 04:181,080-2
5 Sept 2026, 10:011,082-5
1 Sept 2026, 14:541,087-5
29 Aug 2026, 16:341,092-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:031,094+5
23 Aug 2026, 18:581,089-7
20 Aug 2026, 05:031,096-3
16 Aug 2026, 20:451,099-8
10 Aug 2026, 10:211,107-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:031,109no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:271,109first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 31 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9351.4%
🔥4122.7%
🤩2011.0%
👍137.18%
👏116.08%
😎31.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 21 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @genrikamirian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2025 to 21 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2025, 08:55 UTC≈2,880 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вы часто сравниваете свой уровень английского с уровнем других изучающих? (честно)

  1. Да81%
  2. Нет9%
  3. Не совсем10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤6

21 Sept 2025, 06:27 UTC≈2,790 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hello my dearests!! I’m finally back. I’ve recharged my batteries (восстановил силы). Почти месяц здесь не было постов. Я творческий человек, мне очень был важен этот перерыв буквально во всех сферах жизни. Появились новые знакомые, интересы, хобби 🎯 Осень (моё любимое время года!) мне дарит новые силы и изменения как в личной жизни, так и в лингвистической ✨ В этом семестре наконец-то начались интересные для меня…

🔥12❤10🤩3👏2

26 Aug 2025, 18:44 UTC≈2,780 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я дружу с искусственным интеллектом 🤖 Но заменит ли он меня как преподавателя? Спойлер: нет, точно не в ближайшее время… Я признаюсь, что сам так когда-то считал и боялся, что скоро наступит этот день. Но пройдя обучение по ИИ, пообщавшись с IT-специалистами и моими коллегами и постоянно тестируя его, я окончательно понял, что, даже если наступит когда-то, то не в ближайшее время. И вот почему 👇 🔢ИИ галлюцинируе…

❤7👍1🔥1

18 Aug 2025, 17:43 UTC≈2,270 views28 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

лучшее завершение дня😂

❤17👍4👏3😎2🔥1🤩1

18 Aug 2025, 16:28 UTC≈2,260 views20 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

МОЖНО ЛИ ИЗУЧАТЬ АНГЛИЙСКИЙ САМОСТОЯТЕЛЬНО? 🤯 Коротко и понятно: да, но есть нюансы. Мир развивается. Информация стала доступной. В интернете куча бесплатных материалов. Появился ИИ, который помогает ВЕЗДЕ (пока не будем говорить о качестве его работы). Наверное, преподаватели по английскому больше не нужны? Я поднял этот вопрос в моих социальных сетях и мнения моих подписчиков разделились. И это прекрасно! Потому…

🔥9❤7🤩2👏1😎1

15 Aug 2025, 17:13 UTC≈1,900 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уже вижу ваши ответы 🤔 Большинство считает, что это возможно. Поделитесь, почему так думаете? догадываюсь, что во всем виноват прогресс ИИ 😁

👏5❤4🤩3👍1

15 Aug 2025, 16:59 UTC≈1,950 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Друзья, как вы думаете, в 21 веке можно выучить английский полностью БЕЗ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛЯ?

  1. Конечно73%
  2. Нет27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2

14 Aug 2025, 14:37 UTC≈2,880 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💔💔💔 💔💔💔 😌😌 😌😌 Привет! Меня зовут Генрик и я онлайн-преподаватель английского языка 🇬🇧 ⚪️Более 3 лет преподаю английский язык подросткам и взрослым ⚪️Более 10 лет изучаю иностранные языки ⚪️Получаю высшее лингвистическое образование ⚪️Регулярно прохожу профессиональное обучение (сертификаты, папка обновляется) ⚪️Всегда в трендах: проходил обучение по ИИ ⚪️Использую только современные пособия ⚪️Учился и учусь у опыт…

❤15🔥6🤩5

5 Aug 2025, 17:01 UTC≈2,480 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, всем привет! 🤗 Сегодня предлагаю поболтать в комментариях, хочу познакомиться с вами! Расскажите, почему изучаете английский? Как вам нравится изучать его? Какие есть трудности? Чего не хватает на канале? И прочее. Отвечу на все ваши вопросы и буду очень благодарен вашей обратной связи 🥺

❤9🔥3

3 Aug 2025, 07:58 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как правильно?

  1. travelling51%
  2. traveling22%
  3. оба варианта возможны28%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2025, 20:09 UTC≈2,480 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему правильно «know»? 🤔 Разрешите подушнить: вспомним уроки из школьной программы по русскому языку. А именно ✨Сложноподчиненные предложения (СПП)✨. Согласование придаточной части будет не со словом «number», а со словом «people». Давайте возьмем эту часть с определяемым словом (people) в скобки: The number (of people who know about the issue) is surprisingly low. Теперь видно, что глагол “to be” (сказуемое) н…

❤8🤩4🔥3

1 Aug 2025, 10:24 UTC≈1,950 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

The number of people who ______ about the issue is surprisingly low.

  1. knows41%
  2. know44%
  3. оба варианта возможны15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4🔥4🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @genrikamirian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Sept 2025, 08:55 UTCAnonymous Poll386 voters

Вы часто сравниваете свой уровень английского с уровнем других изучающих? (честно)

  1. Да81%
  2. Нет9%
  3. Не совсем10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2025, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Poll241 voters

Друзья, как вы думаете, в 21 веке можно выучить английский полностью БЕЗ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛЯ?

  1. Конечно73%
  2. Нет27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2025, 07:58 UTCFinal Results134 voters

Как правильно?

  1. travelling51%
  2. traveling22%
  3. оба варианта возможны28%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2025, 10:24 UTCFinal Results71 voters

The number of people who ______ about the issue is surprisingly low.

  1. knows41%
  2. know44%
  3. оба варианта возможны15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 21 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“English with Henrik🤠” (@genrikamirian), 1,070 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/genrikamirian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.