Channel
@generalinvest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,762subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001248426842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @generalinvest |
| Created | 10 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/generalinvest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 1,762 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 1,764 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 1,765 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 1,765 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (13 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 713 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
156 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 37.2% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 24.4% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 23.1% | |
| 👌 | 19 | 12.2% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 1.92% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊 Дайджест международных рынков (июль 2026) В июле рынки одновременно отыгрывали три ключевые темы: геополитику, ожидания по ставке ФРС и коррекцию в AI-сегменте. При этом широкого ухода от риска не произошло — основные движения были сосредоточены внутри отдельных секторов и классов активов. После нового витка напряжённости вокруг Ирана нефть Brent за месяц выросла более чем на 20%, а энергетический сектор стал о…
❤4👌3🔥3
Итоги заседания ЦБ в июле. Третий сюрприз за год Банк России в третий раз за год принял решение вопреки ожиданиям рынка, снизив ключевую ставку на 25 б.п., до 14,0%. Однако главным событием стало не само снижение, а обновлённый среднесрочный прогноз, который оказался заметно мягче консенсус-ожиданий. В полном обзоре разбираем, почему регулятор продолжил цикл смягчения денежно-кредитной политики, что изменилось в …
❤3👌1🔥1
📊 Дайджест международных рынков (май — июль 2026) За три месяца глобальный рынок перешёл от широкого спроса на риск к более избирательному режиму. Ключевыми драйверами стали изменения геополитической премии вокруг Ирана, пересмотр ожиданий по денежно-кредитной политике и переоценка инвестиционного цикла искусственного интеллекта. В мае рынки поддержала деэскалация на Ближнем Востоке и снижение цен на нефть. В июн…
👍2🔥2❤1👌1
📊 Дайджест российского рынка акций | Июль ’26 Фокус на компаниях с устойчивыми темпами роста, низкой долговой нагрузкой и высоким дивидендным потенциалом. Идеи • Ozon: +93,0% | див. 5,2% • Т-Технологии: +76,5% | див. 6,7% • Яндекс: +65,7% | див. 4,9% Финансы • Сбербанк: +25,6% | див. 12,7% • Дом.РФ: +20,4% | див. 11,3% Инфраструктура • Транснефть: +33,6% | див. 14,6% Проценты отражают потенциальный рост на гориз…
👍2❤1🔥1
📊 Акции Полюса (PLZL) обвалились на 25% после новости о вероятной приостановке дивидендов Менеджмент Полюса планирует рекомендовать совету директоров приостановить выплату дивидендов до 2030 года, сосредоточившись на реализации масштабных инвестиционных проектов. На этом фоне акции компании резко снизились. В материале ниже разбираем, почему рынок настолько негативно отреагировал на новость, насколько оправдано т…
❤3🔥2💯1
📊 Еще один «черный понедельник» на российском рынке акций. Что предпринять инвесторам? Российский рынок акций пережил самые масштабные распродажи с осени 2022 года. Индекс Мосбиржи обновил многолетние минимумы, а продажи затронули практически все сектора, включая наиболее устойчивые бумаги последних месяцев. В материале ниже разбираем причины паники на рынке, признаки возможной капитуляции инвесторов и принципы, …
👍4❤1🔥1
📊 Рынки в сложной ситуации: ФРС, нефть, ИИ и борьба за ликвидность Финансовые рынки подходят к концу июня в непростой ситуации. Формально индексы остаются недалеко от максимумов, однако одновременно усиливается влияние сразу нескольких факторов риска: более жёсткая риторика ФРС, неопределённость вокруг Ормузского пролива, вопросы к окупаемости инвестиций в ИИ, а также сезонные факторы, связанные с потоками ликвидн…
❤2👌2🔥1
Ставка ЦБ: осторожнее консенсуса — снижение на 25 б.п. до 14,25% Банк России преподнёс сюрприз: ключевая ставка снижена лишь на 25 б.п., до 14,25%. Наш базовый сценарий предполагал 50 б.п. — регулятор оказался осторожнее, чем ожидал консенсус-прогноз рынка. В материале ниже разбираем ключевые сигналы регулятора, почему ЦБ занял более жёсткую позицию, как изменились ожидания по дальнейшей траектории ставки и что э…
❤4👍3🔥2👌1
Какое решение Банк России примет на заседании?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Прогноз решения ЦБ в июне. Снижать, нельзя оставить? Завтра Банк России примет очередное решение по ключевой ставке. В материале ниже разберём, чего мы ждём от регулятора, с какими макроэкономическими данными ЦБ подходит к заседанию, какие факторы сейчас наиболее важны и на какие сигналы рынка стоит обратить внимание. ПОЛНЫЙ ОБЗОР
❤3👌2🔥2
Защита активов — старые задачи и новые вызовы Преемственность и защита активов становятся все более актуальными задачами для собственников бизнеса. О том, как минимизировать риски, повысить устойчивость активов и какую роль в этих процессах играют семейные офисы, рассказал Алексей Станкевич, заместитель генерального директора General Invest, в интервью для РБК. Читать статью полностью
👍9❤2
📊 Ренессанс Страхование (RENI) представило выборочные результаты за I квартал 2026 года Компания показала рост страховых премий на 17,3% г/г до 47,8 млрд руб. Основным драйвером остается сегмент Life, где премии выросли на 27,5%, а накопительное страхование жизни — на 33,5%. Несмотря на снижение чистой прибыли на 16,1% на фоне высокой ставки, сильного рубля и давления на инвестиционный результат, компания сохраня…
👍4❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @generalinvest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое решение Банк России примет на заседании?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,382,719 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“General Invest” (@generalinvest), 1,762 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/generalinvest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.