奸尸真人版血腥动漫完整版会员群观看奸尸冰恋每日持续更新已有38000+时实更新最新流出资源 https://t.me/dgghcfds
Channel
动漫猎奇天堂
@gbnfdcjyy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,511subscribers
+2,785 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003800507761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gbnfdcjyy |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 10 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gbnfdcjyy |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 9,511 | +220 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 9,291 | +326 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 8,965 | +343 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 8,622 | +179 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 8,443 | +127 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 8,316 | +207 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 8,109 | +193 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:13 | 7,916 | +141 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 7,775 | +161 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 7,614 | +218 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 7,396 | +235 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 7,161 | +127 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 7,034 | +153 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 6,881 | +84 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 6,797 | +70 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 6,727 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 6,726 | first reading |
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 72 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 25m 35s
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 34 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 65 | 94.2% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
射杀斩首女尸冰恋奸尸
想被屠宰做爱的女生奸尸冰恋
迫害少萝肢解奸尸越南屠夫
太平间的女尸中出爆操奸尸冰恋
大型奸尸现场女尸冰恋广场
❤1
奸尸真人版血腥动漫完整版会员群观看奸尸冰恋每日持续更新已有38000+时实更新最新流出资源 https://t.me/dgghcfds
奸尸 虐杀 拿电锯把妹子的嫩逼给弄开冰恋
❤1
四肢切断后奸尸可怜的女尸
❤2👍1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7825607725
分解器官插进头颅腰部奸尸冰恋女尸
❤1
女尸切割后身体的每个部位都能奸尸
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @gbnfdcjyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@gbnfdcjyy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 4 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“动漫猎奇天堂” (@gbnfdcjyy), 9,511 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gbnfdcjyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.