— 专业索引工具 · 整合海量信息资源 — 索引机器 @SUOBOT|@SYJQ 专业的信息索引与搜索平台,能帮你快速发现、重要资讯,出海推广营销助手!telegram频道、群组、视频等内容收录检索。

Channel
高端外围【全国外围】
@gaoduanwww
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
14,056subscribers
+10,030 since we began measuring on 24 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003576059292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gaoduanwww |
| Description | #高端外围 #全国外围 #高端修车 #高端楼凤 #高端资源 #外围高端 #极品外围 #高端精品 #高端极品 @gaoduanwww |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gaoduanwww |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:35 | 14,056 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:55 | 14,057 | +10,041 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:51 | 4,016 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:45 | 4,019 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 4,024 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 4,026 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 4 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.082%
- avg views ÷ 14,056 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11.5
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 8.57%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (4 November 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 275 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 20:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,410
- Videos
- ≈722
- Links
- ≈15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 10s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
全球高端外围包养陪玩123线城市均可安排 真实成交纪录,咨询请带地标咨询
武汉 顾清瑶 05/168E 清纯无证 (本人照片) 初恋甜美😜你的专属女孩子 👧:真实05年 Height:168 Bust:E 🉑👄 🉑🚗 🉑69 🉑🐍 🉑✌️ 🉑✈️ 🈚️纹身 全球各地!各种类型!见面付💰 联系客服:@tianyaww09 无法私聊:@tianyabybot #北京外围 #亳州外围 #淮南外围
沈阳 首次⬇️💦🥚蛋多多🏡08在校甜妹儿🉑看学生证🪪 香港大学大一在校🉑️验证 首次下氵短暂停留 🈚️纯天然 无任何纹身 无任何整容 2008年🉑️看身份证🆔168cm86斤 白虎 🐯一线天 蜜桃臀🍑紧致 多 💦喷🐳 69 共🛀🐍👄 皮肤嫩滑 高素质 fw控不催🔥只接素质课 全球各地!各种类型!见面付💰 联系客服:@tianyaww09 无法私聊:@tianyabybot #瑞安外围 #青岛外围 #湛江外围
全国外圍收到 上海客户入会初级会员,88元查看全国极品妹子,免定金,全部见到妹子后满意面付!#最低的价格最全的资源 #清远外围 #阿克苏外围 #西双版纳外围
全球高端外围包养陪玩123线城市均可安排 真实成交纪录,咨询请带地标咨询
台州 娃娃🍎 06年大学生 有学生证 👩🎓 170🐻D 服务耐心不催温柔清纯可以各种验证邻家女孩 皮肤雪白 白到发光 体质敏感 性格温柔 筷子腿 配合度百分百胜任各种姿势5星服务 全球各地!各种类型!见面付💰 联系客服:@tianyaww09 无法私聊:@tianyabybot #泰州外围 #中山外围 #邵阳外围
南宁 新人大学生兼职刚06年 刚下海 🌸皮肤细腻 雪白 通体白白白 🌸碎骨前小纹身 如果没有就是冒充 🌸 - Age年龄2006年 - Height 身高 168cm - Weight体重 49kg - Bust胸围 E杯 🌸 全身雪白 ,纯欲天花板 初恋女友感 🦜5起的条件暂时 3开 🌸 全身无一丝赘肉 👶纯白净清秀幼态小孩 🌸 不抽烟不喝酒少许纹身 纯天然无整容 🌸 通.体.雪.白. 三点粉 🌸主动索吻配合度极高 🌸紧致粉嫩如chu 🌸上课热情超级配合,不催不事 🌸性格超温柔体贴可爱 🌸双商高 乖巧听话 好评选手 全球各地!各种类型!见面付💰 联系客服:@tianyaww09 无法私聊:@tianyabybot #泸州外围 #外圍女 #沈阳外围
全国外圍收到 台州客户入会初级会员,88元查看全国极品妹子,免定金,全部见到妹子后满意面付!#最低的价格最全的资源 #太仓外围 #昆山外围 #安全靠譜
哈尔滨 木鱼🏠 新人兼职170E 哈尔滨 木鱼 170E🐻兼职 69舌吻**👠会跳艳舞 一字马 服务热情🥰给您帝王般的享受 💋 全球各地!各种类型!见面付💰 联系客服:@tianyaww09 无法私聊:@tianyabybot #昆明外围 #吉安外围 #抚州外围
全球高端外围包养陪玩123线城市均可安排 真实成交纪录,咨询请带地标咨询
深圳 小俞🏠硬万173极品网红泡泡🫧 全球各地!各种类型!见面付💰 联系客服:@tianyaww09 无法私聊:@tianyabybot #上海外围 #宿迁外围 #溧阳外围
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @gaoduanwww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @gaoduanwww as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 14 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 4
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“高端外围【全国外围】” (@gaoduanwww), 14,056 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gaoduanwww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.