Channel
@fzgsp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,724subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002343343969 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @fanzhap @fzgsp |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fzgsp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 3,724 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 3,725 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 3,727 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 3,727 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 3,728 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 3,728 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 3,730 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 3,730 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (29 April 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 427 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 84.6% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子昵称：马叔天眼查 骗子用户名：@mashuTYC 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=1971242872 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id=1971242872 其他联系方式： 群组频道链接：https://t.me/mashu86 被骗的总金额：1u 说明被骗过程：1u假地址 昨天拖到现在 公示人：7800410210
骗子昵称：生活 骗子账号： @SLNBYYD 被骗金额： 16U 骗子永久ID： 7319882472 说明被骗过程：教做外挂和内核然后送打号，给了钱就不管了，同伙书屿（ @SSUSDK，id6164394809），不知道骗了多少人，每天都在各个频道发，他频道不让其他人进了没有交流群 公示人： @MmianNB137891
❤1
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子的昵称：北秋（太子） 骗子用户名： @SCORPION7500 绑定号码： +26777767770 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=6714299115 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id=6714299115 其他联系方式： @youyuming @zhan_duan 群组频道链接： https://t.me/M416CN https://t.me/blackSGK https://t.me/SFXxinqun2 https://t.me/kaihequanjiaoliu 他的机器人： @xinaisibot 被骗的总金额 ：39u 说明被骗过程 ：在2026年6月29日晚上8点半左右，我在北秋那边购买了频道和用户名共花费39U，他一直以各种理由进行推脱，直到今日开始不回复信息，这个诈骗犯还模仿外交官。 公示人： @Freeshuju
❤2
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子的昵称：风 赢政 骗子用户名：@yingzheng521 @QVQ_cc @ccwwjj @feng_QvQ_521 苹果直达链接： tg://user?id= 7495047540 tg://user?id= 8981854877 安卓直达链接： tg://openmessage?user_id= 7495047540 tg://openmessage?user_id= 8981854877 其他联系方式：双向机器人：@yingzhen521_bot @QVQ_QWQbot 群组频道链接：https://t.me/yingzhengQvQ https://t.me/yingzheng521 被骗的总金额 ：28U 说明被骗过程 ：收了钱说3天内回单，三天后直接双清 公示人：@LK20240104
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子的昵称：巫山 骗子用户名：@ic772 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=5478339013 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id=5478339013 其他联系方式：@ws_sx_bot 群组频道链接：https://t.me/ij117 被骗的总金额 ：44u 说明被骗过程 ：聊的空不收费空可以退 结果出来错的也收费 空了也收收费 接口出了啥是啥 反正百分百出单 穷人一个 纯诈骗 公示人： @chm10086
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子昵称：万箭齐发 骗子用户名：@WanJianQiFa 苹果直达链接：8659292726 安卓直达链接：8659292726 其他联系方式：无 群组频道链接：https://t.me/meiqianpd 被骗的总金额 ：16u 说明被骗过程 ：一开始他送了两个头然后叫我给他打预存给他打了叫他出单子墨迹我3小时后面说退给我拉黑了 公示人：@nan8888697
❤1
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺 骗子昵称：高仿软件商店 骗子账号： @ZFB3360 @jiaming9 被骗的总金额95u 直达链接：https://t.me/zfb3360 骗子链接两个。http://maur.298.run 说明被骗过程：这个以软件模拟器定制为以进行诈骗，收到款项后就玩消失，随后又上线钓鱼，然后想让你继续掏钱，本来讲好两个95u后来又说一个，就是反复无常。后来无音信。
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺 骗子昵称：王大拿 骗子账号：@wangdana0008 被骗的总金额：1200U 骗子收款地址： 苹果直达链接：@wangdana0008 安卓直达链接：@wangdana0008 说明被骗过程：自己报单开同一体 中字头 国企干部，说了多次以云搜为准，被条子吃敏感不认帐 公示人：@TW34588
❤5😁2
https://t.me/ccccjjjjjjjjjjj 利兴担保拍卖群，各种拍卖 欢迎大家进入畅聊
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺 骗子昵称：缘起 骗子账号： @X521uu 被骗的总金额： 32u 骗子收款地址： 8602576519 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=8602576519 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id=8602576519 说明被骗过程：抖音封禁 没掉不退款 说自己不是本人 难绷 公示人：@Xrrrr21
❤1
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子昵称：反 春江2778 骗子用户名：@F6667899 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=8715983030 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id=8715983030 其他联系方式：无 群组频道链接：无 被骗的总金额：2u 说明被骗过程：出单扯皮 公示人：17
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺 骗子昵称：韩辉 骗子账号：@yibaoto 被骗的总金额： 1u 骗子收款地址： 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=6591962771 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id=6591962771 说明被骗过程：支名 号段 地区，死穷人 3天了不结账 双清 公示人：他爹
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @fzgsp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 801,350 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@fzgsp named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“利兴担保反诈” (@fzgsp), 3,724 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fzgsp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.