Channel
@fuzhou863
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,791subscribers
+1,041 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003989447559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fuzhou863 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 11 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fuzhou863 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 5,791 | +18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 5,773 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 5,775 | +1,025 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 4,750 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 4,750 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,177 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-19 【老师】：李诗雅 【评价人】：#可乐宁🥤（只喝无糖） 【人照评分】：8 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：7 【服务评分】：9.5 【态度评分】：9.5 【环境评分】：9.5 【过程描述】：第二次了，这次不写散文了，老师很配合，颜值没什么风尘感，嫩妹三件套，我还是很难忘记那个晚上，就像有人在床上洒下了一把稻谷，我这只饿了许久的野鸟扑了过去，黑夜给我盖了一层薄被，而她是燃不尽的烈火。 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：叶安 【评价人】：# 【人照评分】：8 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：8.5 【服务评分】：7.5 【态度评分】：8 【环境评分】：9 【过程描述】：人造大概有8分左右吧，挺好看的，叶老师的身材也很好身高不到1米6，但是有屁股，有胸肉都在该有的地方没有陪洗是我自己洗的，你不主动要🐍的话可能全程没🐍，态度不是很热情没有其他表哥说的那种，口活很好 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：森向日子 【评价人】：# 【人照评分】：7 【颜值评分】：7 【身材评分】：7 【服务评分】：8.9 【态度评分】：9 【环境评分】：8 【过程描述】：老师本人跟照片有7分像，服务态度很好，进门给水喝，洗澡的时候还有水中消咳很久，咳了2分钟，然后后面到床上一阵按摩毒龙很深，口活也很好，逼很紧的人小小只的逼好像都很紧 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：森向日子 【评价人】：#要相信光 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：9 【环境评分】：8 【过程描述】：进门老师很热情 洗澡的时候还有水中萧值得去服务老师标杆值得二刷 该有的都有 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-17 【老师】：小七 【评价人】：#盈盛 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：7.5 【态度评分】：8 【环境评分】：9 【过程描述】：下午正在群里找老师，结果突然就发了小七老师，仔细一看，身高180，这不就是我苦苦寻找的比我高的老师吗，果断约。 上楼老师门开着，进门的时候还把老师吓了一跳。老师 颜值也是非常好看，手臂上有纹身，感觉上应该是刚做这一行，有点腼腆，一直看着我笑。我也很少出击，给我搞得都有点不好意思了。 我身高175，老师确实比我高，年龄的话19也没问题，标准的高挑嫩妹。 然后接下来就是交水费，老师有帮洗，还有水中箫也有，擦干后上床，可能因为刚做，没什么服务，不过口的还是很认真的，老师下面有很容易流水。 口硬之后带套，最后后入出水。在沙发上聊了一会，然后就溜了。 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州…
❤1
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-17 【老师】：小七 【评价人】：#匿名用户 【人照评分】：8 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：9.5 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：9 【环境评分】：9 【过程描述】：看到新来的1米8老师，还没尝过这么高的，果断出击 教室位置好找，根据老师指引顺利找到位置，新租的教室环境没问题 一开门，老师确实高，真有一米八，腿长，跟照片差不多，照片是美颜过的，真人没那么白，胸不是特别大，但是软软的够用，是嫩妹年纪18 19这样 交完水费开始服务，妹妹三件套，能蛇还比较尽兴 过程就是女上起手，感觉好爽，然后换了两个姿势，结束 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-17 【老师】：李诗雅 【评价人】：#匿名用户 【人照评分】：8 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：7 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：9 【环境评分】：9 【过程描述】：人照8分，很温柔，很内敛。身高是实打实的，大长腿。服务态度很好，很配合，有蛇。 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-16 【老师】：森向日子 【评价人】：#匿名用户 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【环境评分】：10 【过程描述】：服务非常好，性价比极高，很会聊天，服务是顶级的 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-16 【老师】：森向日子 【评价人】：#匿名用户 【人照评分】：8 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：8 【环境评分】：8 【过程描述】：老师的口很有特色，服务也好，毒🐲很舒服，一次不错的体验，爽爽出水了 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-16 【老师】：前妻 【评价人】：#Bob 【人照评分】：7 【颜值评分】：7 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：7 【环境评分】：7 【过程描述】：正好在万达有点事，频道刷到老师说明天回老家，那必须要出击下，进了工作室，看到老师第一眼还是挺满意的，没有照片中那么嫩，脸上痣有点多，不过好在🐻是真的大，水费一交就是共浴了。口的挺久的，没叫停也不会停，感觉差不多了就戴上套开干，姿势都能配合，看着老师挺轻的，索性抱起来火车便当，体力不支后在沙发上和老师释放，说起来中规中矩得一位老师，不过400的水费也算值回票价。 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-16 【老师】：钰钰 【评价人】：#白 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9.5 【身材评分】：9.5 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【环境评分】：9 【过程描述】：二刷钰钰，传奇鸽子王不曾鸽过我，我要为她说句公道话。平时也没少在群里聊天，两人见面比较熟稔，漱口完就尝起舌钉了，二刷带上了黑丝吊袜带和乳夹铃铛，视觉上的美艳与听觉上的悦耳相得益彰（其实乳钉影响摸胸舔胸，个人感觉不如项圈），后入视角是那种duangduang的，非常赞。课间还尝试了一下拍照，效果不好没留。第二p拿了小玩具出来试试，可惜不能边草边震豆豆，最后互相微掐着脖子出水了。 女大情绪价值很足，略带m属性，感觉是也许是大胸嫩妹的最佳选？玩得开情绪好有蛇钉，钰钰搞抽象的聊起来也有意思。 此报告仅代表个人观点！！ 萝卜青菜，各有所爱，仅供参考！ 福建福州有福之州： @guilinshan3
❤1
福建福州有福之州 报告榜 【时间】：2026-08-14 【老师】：布布 【评价人】：#江河 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9.5 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：8.5 【态度评分】：9 【环境评分】：9 【过程描述】：很久就看布布的频道发美照了，感觉长的很漂亮，可惜囊中羞涩，正好今天抽中券了，于是下午火速预约好时间出击，到达位置后，引导我找到地方。一进去布布小小只的躲在后面，两个人相视一看，人照基本一致，就是皮肤差了一点，我也比较羞涩，随即交了水费就去洗了一下，布布帮我冲了一下，洗完就到床上进入正题，既然是嫩妹没什么服务，于是我就主动服务起来，低下头含住小葡萄，过了一会就主动问我她来帮我口吧，口了两下，感觉受不了于是翻身将布布压在身下，然后戴上雨伞开始耕耘，过程中布布双眼微闭，发出哼哼唧唧的声音，嫩妹就是嫩妹，凿了一会有点受不了，哥哥哥哥的喊着便加快了频率，随着一身的颤抖美美出水。总结，颜值很不错，嫩妹没有什么服务，简单…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fuzhou863. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 185,033 of 1,629,372 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“福州报告频道” (@fuzhou863), 5,791 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuzhou863.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.