Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙁𝙍𝙔𝙕 𝙋𝙐𝘽𝙂𝙈

Channel

𝙁𝙍𝙔𝙕 𝙋𝙐𝘽𝙂𝙈

@fryzgg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,821subscribers

-1,500 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001561832319
TypeChannel
Username@fryzgg
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/fryzgg

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,82121,32120,57121 August 2026 — 21,321 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,302 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,255 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,238 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,222 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,191 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,167 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,151 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,139 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,111 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,081 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,030 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,989 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,947 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,891 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,832 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,764 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,711 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,666 subscribers18 September 2026 — 20,617 subscribers30 September 2026 — 20,398 subscribers5 October 2026 — 20,274 subscribers9 October 2026 — 20,193 subscribers13 October 2026 — 20,090 subscribers15 October 2026 — 20,075 subscribers16 October 2026 — 20,058 subscribers16 October 2026 — 20,040 subscribers17 October 2026 — 20,024 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,982 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,938 subscribers21 October 2026 — 19,931 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,910 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,879 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,853 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,821 subscribers21 August 202625 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 65 days, net -1,500. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,596–21,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 14:0719,821-32
24 Oct 2026, 15:1619,853-26
23 Oct 2026, 13:1819,879-31
22 Oct 2026, 10:2619,910-21
21 Oct 2026, 05:4019,931-7
20 Oct 2026, 02:5719,938-44
19 Oct 2026, 01:1719,982-42
17 Oct 2026, 23:4620,024-16
16 Oct 2026, 22:4720,040-18
16 Oct 2026, 01:2820,058-17
15 Oct 2026, 01:3020,075-15
13 Oct 2026, 18:4120,090-103
9 Oct 2026, 23:4120,193-81
5 Oct 2026, 19:1720,274-124
30 Sept 2026, 06:0020,398-219
18 Sept 2026, 03:2020,617-49
15 Sept 2026, 23:3920,666-45
14 Sept 2026, 05:1720,711-53
12 Sept 2026, 15:3620,764-68
10 Sept 2026, 13:5720,832first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,007 reactions across 37 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤47146.8%
🤣15115.0%
❤‍🔥12112.0%
🔥12112.0%
👍525.16%
💔232.28%
👎90.894%
🤪80.794%
🥰70.695%
👻60.596%
🤡60.596%
🎉50.497%
👌40.397%
😭40.397%
👏30.298%
💘30.298%
😱30.298%
🤩30.298%
⚡20.199%
💊10.099%
4 further kinds40.397%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,007 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 37 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fryzgg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC786 views39 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Кто по пиву?🍺 ✅@fryz_uc_bot

❤20🤣8👍6🔥3🎉1🤩1

1 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC965 views12 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

В тик ток там видос залил, гляньте🔥 ✅@fryz_uc_bot

🔥6❤‍🔥3❤2👍1

31 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC≈1,180 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026

А всм лето уже закончилось👀 ✅@fryz_uc_bot

💔23❤5😭4🤣3❤‍🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,240 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Если такая возня, дайте лайков и комментов в инсте😌 📱Сюда: жмяк..

❤19🔥6❤‍🔥4👍2

31 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,270 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ЧУВАКИ ФРИЗ ЗАПРОС КИНУЛ🙂 ✅@fryz_uc_bot

❤16🤪8🎉4😱3

31 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,230 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Рандомно пару ребят в др приму❗️ 👉ID: 5367959705 ✅Лучший юси бот: @FRYZ_UC_BOT

❤32🔥8❤‍🔥5⚡1

30 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,410 views34 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

СНОВА PAPA FRYZ👍 ✅@fryz_uc_bot

❤21🔥6❤‍🔥5👍1🤡1

30 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,510 views27 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Voice message

✅@FRYZ_UC_BOT

❤13🤣6🔥3🤡3👍2

28 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,970 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @jesus_player

⚔️ Платка — 150грн / 300руб 🏆 Победы: 8 🔹 Луз: 0 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🧑‍⚖️ Проверка в топ — 250грн / 500руб * первая игра против JESUS 🇺🇦, в случае победы — против проверяющего CVV 🇺🇦 🏆Победы( джесус ): 6 🔹Луз( джесус ): 3 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 💬 Писать @jesus_tour

👍2❤1

27 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC≈2,170 views21 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

НУ СЮДА ЕЁ МНЕ❗️ Самые фартовые юси клянусь😳 ✅Лучший юси бот: @FRYZ_UC_BOT

❤‍🔥12❤4🔥4👍1

26 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC≈2,500 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

СЮДА МАЛЕНЬКУЮ❤️ Будете забирать❓ ✅Лучший юси бот: @FRYZ_UC_BOT

❤12🥰3❤‍🔥2👍1🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,530 views12 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

САМАЯ ИМБОВАЯ М416 УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ НОЧЬЮ❗️ ✅Лучший юси бот: @FRYZ_UC_BOT

❤6🔥3❤‍🔥2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @fryzgg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

GRAND TDM 🌍
@grandtdm · 791
#1
DreamPubg🎃
@dreampubg · 423,482
#2
зевсик.2kd туда сюда
@zevvsik2kd · 4,579
#3
FANTOM 🦅PUBG
@FANTOMsvj · 3,087
#4
#VIPNOTBAD
@vipnotbad · 8,010
#5
OBITO
@ob1toTDM · 3,475
#6
OTETS NEWS🗞️
@otetsnew · 13,412
#7
Giv1 🇺🇦
@csGiv1 · 59
#8
K0SHK4
@K0SHK47_pm · 23,661
#9
Глеб
@glebasik21 · 184,746
#10
N1KL0S💧
@NIKLOSPUBG · 23,494
#11
EDVIN
@edvin_tdm · 9,586
#12
1%
@grandchinazes · 819
#13
naBLOKE
@nablokepm · 18,665
#14
𝐂𝐓𝐏𝐀𝐗𝐀𝐇𝐄𝐓
@straxanet_new · 13,700
#15
FORTE🇺🇦
@F0RTEEE · 4,471
#16
1msFLOW
@Onemsflow · 726
#17
KOLIVAN
@kol1vann · 464
#18
NINECENT
@ninecent · 1,229
#19
.
@byistina1 · 1,138
#20
🐇 Mazay 🐇
@DedMazayChannel · 1,855
#21
NLC - NoLoseClub
@NoLoserClub · 1,635
#22

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

N1KL0S💧
@NIKLOSPUBG · 23,494
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 26 September 2026
imreq
@imreq · 58,660
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 21 August 2026
K0SHK4
@K0SHK47_pm · 23,661
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 18 September 2026
.
@cheba180 · 159
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙁𝙍𝙔𝙕 𝙋𝙐𝘽𝙂𝙈” (@fryzgg), 19,821 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fryzgg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.