Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Freie Energie und Freie Wissenschaft

Channel

Freie Energie und Freie Wissenschaft

@freie_energie_freie_wissenschaft

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,737subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001664388626
TypeChannel
Username@freie_energie_freie_wissenschaft
Created30 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/freie_energie_freie_wissenschaft

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,7373,7733,7556 August 2026 — 3,772 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,772 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,773 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,770 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,766 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,767 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,765 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,763 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,760 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,759 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,753 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,751 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,744 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,740 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,737 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,732–3,778 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:173,737-3
15 Sept 2026, 02:403,740-4
11 Sept 2026, 09:153,744-7
6 Sept 2026, 21:413,751-2
2 Sept 2026, 12:143,753-6
30 Aug 2026, 15:023,759-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:583,760-3
24 Aug 2026, 06:423,763-2
20 Aug 2026, 04:543,765-2
17 Aug 2026, 10:383,767+1
13 Aug 2026, 11:243,766-4
10 Aug 2026, 03:013,770-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:013,773+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:483,772no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:583,772first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24m 52s
Average length
4m 09s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,188 reactions across 19 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍68857.9%
❤1149.60%
🤔1149.60%
😱524.38%
👏484.04%
🤣181.52%
💯151.26%
🔥151.26%
😢151.26%
🤬141.18%
🤡131.09%
🕊100.842%
🤯80.673%
👀70.589%
🥰70.589%
😁60.505%
🌚50.421%
🍌50.421%
🎉50.421%
⚡40.337%
10 further kinds252.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2022 to 5 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Dec 2022, 19:29 UTC≈44,100 views229 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Dieses Foto wurde vor mehr als 100 Jahren aufgenommen. Es zeigt eine Ladestation für Elektroautos und Elektrobusse in London. Was uns als modern und innovativ verkauft wird ist in Wahrheit schon über 100 Jahre alt. Die einzige Frage die bleibt, warum ist das alles verschwunden...

👍148🤔31❤20👀7👏6💯6⚡3🎉3

29 Nov 2022, 12:59 UTC≈34,000 views104 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

"Wenn du die Bedeutung der 3, 6 und 9 verstanden hast, dann hast du einen Schlüssel zum Universum." Nikola Tesla

👍66🤔16❤7👏5😴4🔥2🥰2🙏2

29 Nov 2022, 12:57 UTC≈24,800 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Das beste Ebook was es zum Thema Zahlen gibt. Hinter Zahlen steckt viel mehr als man auf den ersten blickt denkt. Nikola Tesla hat nicht umsonst immer die hohe Bedeutung hinter zahlen hingewiesen. Zahlen können uns heilen, Gott näher bringen, das Universum verstehen lassen, wissen bringen und vieles mehr... 👉🏻Hier geht es zum EBook👈🏻

👍29❤11🤨3👏2😐2🤔1

29 Nov 2022, 00:18 UTC≈24,100 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Glyphosat was von einem behälter in den anderen abgelassen wird. Es sieht aus wie computer animiert, ist aber echt. Man kann sich wahrscheinlich nicht mal annähernd vorstellen was die Inhaltsstoffe dieser Chemiebrühe sind...

😱39🤔11👍8😢7🔥6❤2🕊2⚡1

29 Nov 2022, 00:17 UTC≈17,800 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍24🤡9😁4❤3

28 Nov 2022, 23:31 UTC≈17,600 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

In der Mongolei laufen Schafe zwölf Tage lang ohne Unterbrechung im Kreis und niemand weiß warum

🤔27👍14😱9❤4😁1

28 Nov 2022, 23:28 UTC≈16,600 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Die Natur als Vorbild in der Technik

👍37👏6🤩1🙏1

28 Nov 2022, 23:27 UTC≈18,000 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Bioelektrische Veränderungen in Pilzen und Pflanzen werden in Töne umgewandelt.

❤16👏7👍6🤩1

28 Nov 2022, 23:22 UTC≈15,800 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Chinas geheimnisvoller eierlegender Berg, der Steineier ausstößt Der Berg Gandang im Südwesten Chinas hat ein interessantes Phänomen, das Geologen, Forscher und Einheimische seit Jahrzehnten beobachten. In der Provinz Guizhou gelegen, umfassen die felsigen Wände des Fußes des Berges eine Klippe, die Einheimische als „Chan Dan Ya“ bezeichnen, Mandarin für „eierlegende Klippe“, wegen der Fähigkeit, alle 30 Jahre „Stein…

👍13🤔8❤3👏1

26 Nov 2022, 14:30 UTC≈17,200 views126 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍81❤18💯8🕊8🤣5😱4🤡1🙏1

26 Nov 2022, 14:29 UTC≈16,500 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Casimir Effekt Hendrick B. G. Casimir sagte 1948 voraus, dass, wenn zwei Metallplatten ausreichend nahe beieinander liegen (ein Mikrometer: ein Tausendstel Millimeter), der Abstand zwischen den Platten kleiner sein würde als die Wellenlänge einiger elektromagnetischer Wellen, die hindurchgehen. Er sagte voraus, dass in diesem Fall die Wellen außerhalb dieser Lücke die Platten zusammendrücken würden. 50 Jahre später…

👍27👏6❤5🤯3🎉2🍓1

26 Nov 2022, 14:26 UTC≈18,600 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Mythos Überbevölkerung Mal abgesehen davon ob die offiziellen zahlen überhaupt stimmen und es wirklich 8 Milliarden Menschen auf der Welt gibt. Nehmen wir aber mal an es leben tatsächlich 8 Milliarden Menschen auf der Erde Selbst dann sind wir weit weg von einer Überbevölkerung.

👍49👏10🤔6❤5🏆3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @freie_energie_freie_wissenschaft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Nov 2022, 14:11 UTCAnonymous Poll1,200 voters approx.

Eine kleine Umfrage an alle wundervollen Mitglieder hier auf dem Kanal. Mit welchem Thema beschäftigt ihr euch am meisten ?

  1. Gesundheit37%
  2. Politik und Wirtschaft9%
  3. Spiri­tua­lität und Esoterik20%
  4. Geschichte9%
  5. Wissenschaft17%
  6. Ufos und Aliens4%
  7. Finanzen und Investment3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2022 to 5 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Freie Energie und Freie Wissenschaft” (@freie_energie_freie_wissenschaft), 3,737 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freie_energie_freie_wissenschaft.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.