Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FreeNZ

Channel

FreeNZ

@freenewzealand

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,279subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001556585419
TypeChannel
Username@freenewzealand
Created22 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/freenewzealand

Growth

2,2792,2862,282.56 August 2026 — 2,286 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,286 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,285 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,279 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,278–2,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:532,279-4
12 Aug 2026, 15:532,283-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:212,285-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:182,286no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:552,286first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.6%
avg views ÷ 2,279 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.684%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total35,096
Reactions total240
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 39s
Average length
2m 53s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

274 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10337.6%
👍8932.5%
👏238.39%
🙏145.11%
💯114.01%
😢114.01%
🔥93.28%
💩31.09%
🏆20.73%
🕊20.73%
😈20.73%
🤯20.73%
🤩10.365%
🥰10.365%
🫡10.365%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC316 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Barry Young: “There Was Nothing for Me to Gain… Only to Help Other People” In this short but powerful exchange, Andrew Bridgen asks Barry Young the central question: if he is not a whistleblower, what is he? Barry’s answer is direct, but with a wry smile. Had he been acting out of self-interest he would have remained silent and be “sitting on a yacht somewhere, sipping a piña colada.” Instead he has been unemploye

10

3 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC440 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Official Information Act Response: Safety of NZ’s New Oral Fluid Roadside Drug Tests Rests on the Manufacturer’s Word In this clip, Nigel Antony Gray details Official Information Act questions put to police about the safety of New Zealand’s new roadside oral fluid drug-testing regime. The Minister of Police responded with three or four letters from Securetec, the manufacturer of the DrugWipe device, including a saf

8👍4

3 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC376 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Barry Young: The Safest Vaccine Site in New Zealand Was Right Next to Parliament Barry Young explains the detailed statistical analysis he performed on the New Zealand vaccination data. Using the same tools an epidemiologist would employ - graphs, confidence intervals, Poisson scores, p-values and Standardised Mortality Rates (SMRs) - he examined both the national picture and individual vaccination sites. While the

7

28 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC623 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Latest Update on Legal Situation with Barry Young - 28 July 2026 A decision from the Judge is expected to be made on October the 20th, 2026 on whether Barry Young is deemed a whistleblower under the Protected Disclosures Act in New Zealand, or whether he is not deemed a whistleblower, in which case he will have to go to a full trial. https://youtu.be/c28PE6FWgeg

👍8🙏3🕊1🥰1

27 Jul 2026, 23:13 UTC610 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If Barry Young Isn’t a Whistleblower, No One in New Zealand Ever Will Be In this critical clip, the discussion centres on the single most important question in Barry Young’s case: is he a whistleblower under New Zealand’s Protected Disclosures Act? If the court says yes, the case ends, he is protected, and the people’s own data can finally be examined by independent epidemiologists around the world. If the court s

💯113👍2

27 Jul 2026, 04:27 UTC≈1,140 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Andrew Bridgen & Barry Young: The Case That Could Decide the Future of Whistleblowers Worldwide On the eve of the hearing that will decide whether Barry Young qualifies as a whistleblower under New Zealand law, Andrew Bridgen joins him for a frank discussion about the global stakes. Bridgen explains why governments everywhere fear genuine whistleblowers and why Barry’s pure, single-operator dataset is uniquely powe

👏11👍4

26 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC≈6,210 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Barry Young Full Interview: The Database, the Death Clusters & the Fight to Be Recognised as a Whistleblower In this landmark full interview, Barry Young - the senior Oracle DBA who built New Zealand’s COVID pay-per-dose vaccination database - tells his complete story. Fully supportive of the rollout at the beginning, he describes how he began seeing statistically impossible clusters of deaths linked to the same si

8👍6👏2

26 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTC466 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Human Cost: Barry Young Describes Building a Database That Broke His Heart Barry Young reflects on what it felt like to build the national vaccination database while watching unusual clusters of deaths appear in the records. He describes the work as “very, very painful” and admits he was in tears for most of it. The decision to finally speak out brought a great sense of release after years of carrying the know

😢115🏆2🕊1

25 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈5,170 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Andrew Bridgen in Budapest: Reiner Fuellmich Update, Nuremberg II Plans & Big Pharma’s Next Moves In this wide-ranging interview from Budapest, Andrew Bridgen updates listeners on his authorised call with imprisoned lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, which was mysteriously cut off as Reiner described his criminal abduction from Mexico by German authorities. Bridgen shares that Reiner remains resilient after nearly three year

9👍2👏1

25 Jul 2026, 02:56 UTC643 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

“Colossal Money” - Whistleblower Reveals $35 Per Shot Payments Driving NZ’s Vaccine Rollout Providers were paid $30-35 for every shot administered - money that flowed out in millions every single week from taxpayer funds. Pharmacies, doctor surgeries, walk-in centres and chemists would have been collecting many millions, creating a powerful incentive to get as many needles in arms as possible. Barry notes that thi

9👍1

24 Jul 2026, 22:54 UTC≈1,220 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Barry Young: Whistleblowing Hero - Barry Is Innocent (Music Video) https://rumble.com/v72x6aw-barry-young-whistleblowing-hero-barry-is-innocent.html?e9s=src_v1_clr%2Csrc_v1_ucp_v

10

24 Jul 2026, 06:09 UTC497 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Barry Young Case: No Personal Data Released - And the Actual Charges Reveal Everything In this clarifying clip, the New Zealand whistleblower stresses a critical point that is often misunderstood: in three years, not a single New Zealander’s personal details have ever been revealed, and he never released anything personal. The actual charges have nothing to do with Barry's Protected Disclosure. Instead, he faces a

👍91😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @freenewzealand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 552,005 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FreeNZ” (@freenewzealand), 2,279 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freenewzealand.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.