6 measurements spanning 13 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,639–1,662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Aug 2026, 04:43
1,642
-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:15
1,644
-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:11
1,645
-4
7 Aug 2026, 15:31
1,649
-10
6 Aug 2026, 17:16
1,659
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:54
1,659
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 1,642 subscribers
Avg views / post
321
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
15 (7 June 2025 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
321
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
55s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
452 reactions across 14 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
19.7%
😢
80
17.7%
👍
76
16.8%
🔥
48
10.6%
🫡
26
5.75%
🖕
20
4.42%
👌
19
4.20%
🌚
15
3.32%
🥰
14
3.10%
💔
12
2.65%
🤡
10
2.21%
🤯
9
1.99%
👎
6
1.33%
💩
6
1.33%
🤔
6
1.33%
🤣
6
1.33%
😁
4
0.885%
🕊
2
0.442%
🤮
2
0.442%
⚡
1
0.221%
1 further kind
1
0.221%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 452reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @foodonfoot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Бывшие коллеги, всем привет. Канал не собирается "оживать", так что, для кого-то это станет просто напоминаем отписаться.
Остальным задам вопрос: а какие сервисы доставки сейчас на волне популярности среди курьеров?
Просто, помню, раньше бывало как: запускается какой-то новый сервис, устанавливает интересные условия, жирные рефералки, "куры" перетекают из опыстылевших ЯЕ и "Самоката" туда.
Потом модный сервис ужест…
Траблы в курьерке тупо каждый день!
Нерадивые клиенты, тупая поддержка, порой жесткие ситуации с курьерами...
Дальше перечислять?
Не проходи мимо, загляни что творится в Шаболдах Доставки
Почему стоит подписаться?
1. Свобода слова в комментариях
2. Посты каждый день. Вплоть до 10.
3. Открыта предложка и личка админа, где можно делиться своим контентом, а его уже опубликуют
Подписывайся и смотри приколы вместе!
Позавчера, 29 октября, умер Александр Шкробот, тот самый "зачётный дед" из Челябинска. Стало плохо с сердцем во время велопоездки.
Я видел несколько заголовков про "умер на работе", но из текстов так и не ясно, ехал ли он, выполняя заказы, или просто была личная поездка. Так или иначе - rest in peace.
Так, спокойно. Канал не "ожил" и не думает. Я просто зашёл положить ещё одну находку в папку #арт
Картина некоего Андрея Стрелкова, называется, как будто бы "Маша и Мамед".
И не факт, что называется именно так, поскольку на сайте с работами художника я её так и не нашёл. И сам сайт нашёл с трудом, через комментарии в ВК-пабликах, которые выкладывают что угодно, называют это, как угодно, и у которых не то, что нет и…
Яндекс-Еда позвала меня на одно мероприятие. И несмотря на то, что я существенно минимизировал и курьерскую свою деятельность, и блогерскую, пойти я туда намерен.
Это будет некий пресс-завтрак, посвященный презентации новой формы для курьеров. Но обещают разговор и на другие темы.
Я к этой встрече могу собрать вопросы от своей аудитории - ну, в общем, для этого я этот пост и пишу.
"Мопед не мой, я просто разместил …
Недавно в нашем чате кто-то написал: "в этом канале так давно ничего не было, что я подумал, что отписался".
Это правда, уже полтора месяца ничего я не постил. Во-первых, много сил и времени отнимает основная работа; я перешёл из одной сети общепита в другую и нахожусь в моей любимой стадии стажёра, изучаю новое.
Во-вторых, уже долгое время я выхожу на доставки реже одного раза в месяц. Мне уже просто не хватает эк…
Админу позавчера попался любопытный мультизаказ: из одного и того же ресторана - в одну и ту же квартиру. Не буду демонстрировать это скриншотами, чтобы не палить личные данные клиента, просто поверьте на слово.
Итак, абсолютно одинаковое расстояние до ресторана, оба "клиента" в одной и той же точке - то есть второй отрезок мультизаказа равняется по идее 0 метров.
При этом разница в оплате обоих заказов - 20₽. А зн…
Работа курьером — это постоянно быть в движении. 2ГИС всегда подскажет короткий путь — хоть пешком, хоть на транспорте.
Также с помощью Друзей на карте 2ГИС ты можешь в реальном времени видеть друзей и коллег поблизости. А если кто-то рядом — встретиться, поболтать или попить кофе.
Навигация — это удобно. А друзья рядом — это настоящая поддержка.
Она догнала его!
#классные_фотки в шакальном разрешении взял отсюда
❤27
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @foodonfoot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ногами курьера” (@foodonfoot), 1,642 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foodonfoot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.