Do not interact with @PROJECT_MANAGER_KPMG_FLEX_JOBS they are not associated with FlexJobs and are using messenger apps to try to scam job seekers with our name. Please report and block if they contact you.
👍125❤51🖕27👏12🥰8🤬7🍓5👎3

Channel
@flexjobsofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,040subscribers
+202 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001929254313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flexjobsofficial |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flexjobsofficial |
Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 5,040 | -4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 5,044 | -9 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 5,053 | +4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 5,049 | +12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 5,037 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 5,039 | +9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 5,030 | +22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 5,008 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 4,993 | +26 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 4,967 | +43 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 4,924 | +14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 4,910 | +37 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 4,873 | +20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 4,853 | +15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 4,838 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 4,838 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
883 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 482 | 54.6% | |
| ❤ | 205 | 23.2% | |
| 🤬 | 35 | 3.96% | |
| 😡 | 29 | 3.28% | |
| 🖕 | 27 | 3.06% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 2.49% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 2.04% | |
| 🤡 | 18 | 2.04% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 1.70% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 1.13% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 0.906% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 0.566% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.453% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.34% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.113% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.113% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 883 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2023 to 27 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Do not interact with @PROJECT_MANAGER_KPMG_FLEX_JOBS they are not associated with FlexJobs and are using messenger apps to try to scam job seekers with our name. Please report and block if they contact you.
👍125❤51🖕27👏12🥰8🤬7🍓5👎3
Do not message with @flexjobs234 they are not associated with FlexJobs and are scamming job seekers on Telegram and WhatsApp. We do not reach out to anyone on these apps.
👍56❤26🤡13👏6😁6🥰2⚡1
Do not message with @fliexjobs1i they are not associated with FlexJobs and are scamming job seekers on TikTok and Telegram. Please report the account immediately!
👍39🤬17❤11😢6🤡5
Do not message with @Jess_VyvialLarson She is claiming to be a flexjobs employee but she does not work with us. Please report her account if she attempts to reach out to you.
👍29😡29🤬11😁2❤1
Do not engage with @tunuama and @chrishill0077 These users have copied photos of our employees to try and scam job seekers. FlexJobs will never recruit over telegram, WhatsApp or on social media.
👍32❤14💩9😢2🥰1
@flexjobsadmin and @flexjobsonline are scammers using the FlexJobs logo to scam job seekers. Please report these accounts if they reach out to you.
👍18❤15
https://www.instagram.com/peter_handsmann23/ is also a scammer. Please do not interact with him.
👍16❤5
DO NOT communicate with @bizzcoach_53 or @intlpaymentservices They are scammers attempting to use the FlexJobs name to scam job seekers.
👍17❤10
Please do not communicate with @andrew16h @peters0099 @fransco4 These people are criminals and they are using the FlexJobs name to scam job seekers out of work and money. Please report these accounts if they message you.
👍21❤13🥰5
Please do not communicate with @viciplunkett because she is attempting to impersonate FlexJobs and scam you out of money and jobs. Please report that profile if they attempt to contact you.
👍16❤5
There is another scammer you should know about. @recruiter004 is NOT affiliated with FlexJobs and you should not conduct business with him on telegram. Stay safe out there.
👍9😁5❤2🥰1
The following accounts ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH FLEXJOBS: @Erika_Stovall @Kenneth_Phill01 @projectsupport0 @Realworksgroup Do not conduct business with these accounts.They will attempt to get free work from you and trick you into believing they work with FlexJobs. We do not recruit on Telegram!
❤13👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flexjobsofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@flexjobsofficial named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FlexJobs” (@flexjobsofficial), 5,040 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flexjobsofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.