Channel
@flatearthbible
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,982subscribers
+215 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001421431330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flatearthbible |
| Created | 22 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flatearthbible |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 1,982 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 1,978 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1,973 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 1,966 | +13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 1,953 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 1,949 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 1,946 | +178 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 1,768 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,767 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 Government Documents Proving Flat Earth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEmoJZWKIzY The following 50 documents from NASA, the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, FAA, DOD, CIA and other organizations constantly speak of a flat, non-rotating Earth with stationary atmosphere, and use that assumption for equations of motion, plane flight, rocket and projectile trajectories and many other official purposes... Get Connected…
https://odysee.com/@Thatwhichisimportant:1/signal-2025-11-21-085743:9
what's interesting is that the curve is consistent even though it's going across an alledged spherical surface. this is examined in great detail in a book called "your science teacher is wrong"
https://youtu.be/mkDfxFR5gwg?si=geWCdRaEQR9yQd0x
Photo, posted without a caption
All this terroristic not believing the worlds doctrines and its appointed Priests of scientism has gone far enough. Keep the FAITH in the honor and trustworthiness of our politicians, the scientists they employ and approve the curriculums that train them, and, last but definitely not least, the god of this world and BELIEVE that: 1. NASA discovered and is going to visit a 700 QUINTILLION dollar gold nugget in spac…
They said the moon reflects sunlight but what if that’s not true? Look closer. The shapes, the edges… those aren’t craters they’re continents. The moon isn’t glowing from the sun. It’s mirroring Earth. The truth has been hiding in plain sight. - Ron Wilson Join: @Free_Energy_Tesla ⚡️ Top Channels: Click to Join
Photo, posted without a caption
From 6:30 to 21:52 there are many quotes from a flat earth believer. Can someone explain where the errors are? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBtRMlVbrmo
Great personal story: https://odysee.com/@Thatwhichisimportant:1/video_2026-04-29_18-05-00:d Telegram Channel: https://t.me/MILITARY_PURGE_etc Odysee Channel: https://odysee.com/@Thatwhichisimportant:1
https://x.com/i/status/2053817933797745016
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @flatearthbible. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Flat Earth Bible” (@flatearthbible), 1,982 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flatearthbible.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.