Channel
@firewalllive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,102subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001477896654 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @firewalllive |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/firewalllive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 2,102 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 2,101 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (30 January 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 696 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📡 Wireshark Learning Community Want to improve your packet analysis and network troubleshooting skills? Join our Wireshark Telegram channel for: ✅ Wireshark tips & tricks ✅ Display filter examples ✅ Packet analysis case studies ✅ Networking & cybersecurity content ✅ Real-world troubleshooting scenarios ✅ Free learning resources Whether you're a beginner or an experienced network engineer, you'll find practical conten…
🔥 Cybersecurity Courses – Limited-Time Discount! Use Coupon Code: CYBER062026 📚 Available Courses: 🔐 PKI, Encryption & Security Protocols https://www.udemy.com/course/mastering-pki/?couponCode=CYBER062026 ☁️ AWS WAF – Protecting Web Applications https://www.udemy.com/course/comprehensive-guide-to-aws-waf-protecting-web-applications/?couponCode=CYBER062026 🌐 IPSec VPN & Proxy https://www.udemy.com/course/ipsecvpn…
🚀 Cybersecurity Courses on Discount! Use code 👉 CYBER18042026 🔐 PKI & Encryption https://www.udemy.com/course/mastering-pki/?couponCode=CYBER18042026 ☁️ AWS WAF https://www.udemy.com/course/comprehensive-guide-to-aws-waf-protecting-web-applications/?couponCode=CYBER18042026 🌐 IPSec VPN https://www.udemy.com/course/ipsecvpn/?couponCode=CYBER18042026 🛡️ Palo Alto Hardening https://www.udemy.com/course/palo-alto-an…
Photo, posted without a caption
Hi there, Are you looking to enhance your cybersecurity and networking skills? I’m excited to share a collection of high-quality Udemy courses covering everything from encryption and cloud security to penetration testing and ransomware defense — all available with special coupon discounts. 🔐 Mastering PKI, Encryption, and Security Protocols https://www.udemy.com/course/mastering-pki/?couponCode=21032026 ☁️ Compre…
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Palo Alto Firewall Essentials
Channel name was changed to «F5 | PALOALTO | CHECKPOINT | SOPHOS | FORTIGATE | Zscaler»
https://t.me/+NnLJcXg5-MRjNGJl
Follow me on Instagram for daily content on tech, cyber security, and trending reels! I share: ✅ Short informative reels ✅ Viral tech content ✅ Tips & tools you can use daily 👉 Follow here: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cyberbruharmy?igsh=MXZ3YzBtZWpmcnJzcA== Let’s grow together 🚀
https://www.instagram.com/cyberbruharmy?igsh=bXZmdHRwa3hmeHYz
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @firewalllive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“F5 | PALOALTO | CHECKPOINT | SOPHOS | FORTIGATE | Zscaler” (@firewalllive), 2,102 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/firewalllive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.