Channel
@finvibe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,000subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001734762420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finvibe |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finvibe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 1,000 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 1,002 | +23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 979 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 980 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 980 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,431 |
| Reactions total | 103 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
200 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 69 | 34.5% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 27.0% | |
| custom 5458767952767633980 | 49 | 24.5% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5458467515510311535 | 5 | 2.50% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📹 Выпустил интересный reels про наше с вами самое дорогое — время. Мы его тратим в телефоне и чем дольше, тем больше отнимаем его у себя любимых, а может и не только у себя. Сам грешу скроллингом, но стараюсь держать мозги в тонусе, а чтобы такая статистика была не только пугающей, но интересной и полезной я добавляю туда финансовую мораль, какую? Смотрите в ролике запрещенной сети по ссылке 👈
👍2🔥2custom 54587679527676339802
📹 Завершил цикл роликов про дивидендный гэп. Все видео на эту тему, и не только, можно посмотреть в профиле запрещенной сети в разделе reels. Кстати, топовое видео про гонку активов уже набрало 81,3 тысячи просмотров.
❤6custom 54587679527676339803👍2
📧 Забыл с вами поделиться, что недавно опубликовали написанный мною курс по психологии в школе Московской биржи. Курс бесплатный, практический, надо только зарегистрироваться. Уроки читаются легко, а польза может быть ощутимой. Кто заинтересовался — вот ссылка.
🔥6👍4custom 54587679527676339804
🏦 Сбер закрыл дивидендный гэп за две недели. А это мало или много? Как раз готовлю инфографику по статистике закрытия дивидендных разрывов среди акций российского рынка.
👍5🔥2custom 54587679527676339802
🚀Отскочил сегодня на почти 18%, SK Hynix прибавила около 30%, Samsung Electronics — 29%.Поддержали отчёты Microsoft и Amazon, которые показали, что расходы на инфраструктуру для ИИ никто урезать не собирается, и рынок интерпретировал это как обещание увеличения спроса на память и чипы. Уверенности добавил глава SK Group Чхве Тхэ Вон*, который купил акции SK Hynix. *Чхве Тхэ Вон — южнокорейский бизнесмен, председател…
🔥4custom 54587679527676339804👍3
📧 Корейский фондовый рынок переживает не лучшие времена. Индекс KOSPI снизился на 40%, говоря о раздутости включенных в него акций, которые связаны с ИИ. Ранее писал об этом — здесь. 💱 Замечу, что этот индекс, как и IMOEX, не включает реинвестирование дивидендов, но корейский индекс полной доходности упал также на 40% от максимума в отличие от российского. IMOEX от максимумов ниже на 48%, то есть почти как корейский…
custom 54587679527676339804👍3🔥3
Если, вдруг, напишет — это мошенник
Кстати, поменяны пароли везде были и поставлен самозапрет на кредиты и оформление сим карт, советую также везде ставить двухфакторную аутентификацию и максимальную защиту
Чудом уцелела моя почта, у них уже был доступ, но я за доли секунды до смены телефона и паролей и получения прочих доступов успел заблокировать им устройство и поменять пароль. Эта история требует отдельного ролика, насколько схемы стали искусными...
Друзья, меня пытались взломать, если вам кто-то напишет от моего имени или имени Financial Vibes — пишите мне в личку или игнорируйте
👍5
Банк России тонко скорректировал риторику — в новом пресс-релизе исчезла прямая формулировка о предстоящем снижении ключевой ставки. Вместо неё регулятор теперь ссылается на обтекаемую зависимость будущих решений от динамики цен и внешних рисков. 📉 Что произошло со ставкой: 🔵Ключевая ставка снижена в десятый раз подряд — с 14,25% до 14% 🔵При этом проинфляционные риски не исчезли: вторичные эффекты в промышленности п…
👍3🔥3custom 54587679527676339803
Шашлыки... Все любят летом пожарить пару килограмм мяса, но насколько за последние 5 лет шашлычный набор подорожал? Смотрим в видео 👆
🔥6👍4custom 54587679527676339804
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @finvibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@finvibe named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Financial Vibes” (@finvibe), 1,000 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finvibe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.