Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Finance with Aman

Channel

Finance with Aman

@financetalkswithaman

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

28,798subscribers

+4,630 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003593538920
TypeChannel
Username@financetalkswithaman
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/financetalkswithaman

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,16828,85826,5137 August 2026 — 24,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,168 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,263 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,510 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,639 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,053 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,197 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,622 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,993 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,095 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,154 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,218 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,352 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,441 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,699 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,761 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,841 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,847 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,905 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,002 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,444 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,742 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,799 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,844 subscribers3 September 2026 — 27,917 subscribers5 September 2026 — 28,050 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,379 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,405 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,558 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,666 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,715 subscribers19 September 2026 — 28,746 subscribers25 September 2026 — 28,773 subscribers4 October 2026 — 28,858 subscribers8 October 2026 — 28,798 subscribers28,7987 August 20268 October 2026
36 measurements spanning 62 days, net +4,630. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,465–29,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 14:0128,798-60
4 Oct 2026, 03:5928,858+85
25 Sept 2026, 12:2228,773+27
19 Sept 2026, 01:4028,746+31
16 Sept 2026, 14:3928,715+49
14 Sept 2026, 17:1628,666+108
13 Sept 2026, 05:0228,558+153
11 Sept 2026, 05:3528,405+26
8 Sept 2026, 10:1528,379+329
5 Sept 2026, 05:2028,050+133
3 Sept 2026, 09:1827,917+73
2 Sept 2026, 06:1527,844+45
1 Sept 2026, 09:2627,799+57
31 Aug 2026, 11:0227,742+298
30 Aug 2026, 09:0327,444+442
29 Aug 2026, 06:5327,002+97
28 Aug 2026, 03:4426,905+58
27 Aug 2026, 06:0426,847+6
26 Aug 2026, 04:4226,841+80
25 Aug 2026, 04:1326,761first reading

Engagement

946 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.59%
avg views ÷ 28,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,190
378 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
378
of 946 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held946 (7 August 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total826,515
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 11:28 UTC996 viewsread 8 October 2026

📊 NIFTY 50 — HISTORICAL WEEKLY LOSING STREAK • 1993: 10 consecutive losing weeks — longest in history • 2001: 9 consecutive losing weeks • 2008: 7 consecutive losing weeks • 2020: 7 consecutive losing weeks • 2026: 9 consecutive losing weeks — longest since 2001* Historically, prolonged losing streaks have often been followed by strong rebounds, but the recovery period has varied. New record will be made?

8 Oct 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 8 October 2026
File

The Finance Full Day Report | 08 October 2026 | Created by @Financetalkswithaman | For education and research purposes.

Signed The 8AM Report

8 Oct 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 8 October 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeOsAgVJJqW/?stkn=dGE2bmY0aW00MGV3 NIFTY 22200 Pullback or 21500?

8 Oct 2026, 08:02 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 8 October 2026

Thinking of exiting? https://www.instagram.com/p/DeOc3D7n_Sp/?stkn=MXB3eGJieGdhcGNrdg==

8 Oct 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🚀 THE ULTIMATE IPO & SWING TRADING MASTERCLASS Learn how to identify and trade high-potential IPO stocks using a structured swing-trading system. ✔️ Swing-trading basics ✔️ How to shortlist strong IPOs ✔️ Listing-day and post-listing analysis ✔️Entry, stop-loss and exit strategies ✔️ Real IPO trades and case studies 🎁 A bumper gift will be revealed at the end! 📅 Saturday, 10 October ⏱ 12 PM IST 👉 Register here: h…

Showing the 12 most recent of 946 posts we hold for @financetalkswithaman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Oct 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Poll282 voters

PF today?

  1. green✅43%
  2. red❗️44%
  3. flat 💫16%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTCAnonymous Poll206 voters

Launching 5 slots offer today on the Academy.

  1. 25% off5%
  2. 30% off - Need minimum 150 votes before i launch97%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Oct 2026, 09:13 UTCAnonymous Poll248 voters

When should we keep it?

  1. Next week Saturday. 10th October77%
  2. Next week Friday. 9th October27%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Sept 2026, 06:05 UTCAnonymous Poll327 voters

PF today?

  1. Green41%
  2. Red43%
  3. Flat17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 04:35 UTCAnonymous Poll168 voters

Did you trade?

  1. yes16%
  2. no84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTCAnonymous Poll438 voters

PF Today?

  1. green13%
  2. red80%
  3. flat8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 946 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Finance with Aman” (@financetalkswithaman), 28,798 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/financetalkswithaman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.