35000 of FII selling in this month

Channel
Finance with Aman
@financetalkswithaman
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
28,798subscribers
+4,630 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003593538920 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @financetalkswithaman |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/financetalkswithaman |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:01 | 28,798 | -60 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 28,858 | +85 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 28,773 | +27 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 28,746 | +31 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 28,715 | +49 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 28,666 | +108 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:02 | 28,558 | +153 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:35 | 28,405 | +26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 28,379 | +329 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 28,050 | +133 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 27,917 | +73 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 27,844 | +45 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:26 | 27,799 | +57 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 27,742 | +298 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 27,444 | +442 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 27,002 | +97 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 26,905 | +58 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 26,847 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 26,841 | +80 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 26,761 | first reading |
Engagement
946 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.59%
- avg views ÷ 28,798 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,190
- 378 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 378
- of 946 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 946 (7 August 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 826,515 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 13s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
📊 NIFTY 50 — HISTORICAL WEEKLY LOSING STREAK • 1993: 10 consecutive losing weeks — longest in history • 2001: 9 consecutive losing weeks • 2008: 7 consecutive losing weeks • 2020: 7 consecutive losing weeks • 2026: 9 consecutive losing weeks — longest since 2001* Historically, prolonged losing streaks have often been followed by strong rebounds, but the recovery period has varied. New record will be made?
Register now. Session in 2days
The Finance Full Day Report | 08 October 2026 | Created by @Financetalkswithaman | For education and research purposes.
Signed The 8AM Report
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeOsAgVJJqW/?stkn=dGE2bmY0aW00MGV3 NIFTY 22200 Pullback or 21500?
Aaj TO IPO index fell by 2.5%
NEW low has been made of 22190 after April
Thinking of exiting? https://www.instagram.com/p/DeOc3D7n_Sp/?stkn=MXB3eGJieGdhcGNrdg==
NIFTY 500
Crazy
KANOHAR still up
🚀 THE ULTIMATE IPO & SWING TRADING MASTERCLASS Learn how to identify and trade high-potential IPO stocks using a structured swing-trading system. ✔️ Swing-trading basics ✔️ How to shortlist strong IPOs ✔️ Listing-day and post-listing analysis ✔️Entry, stop-loss and exit strategies ✔️ Real IPO trades and case studies 🎁 A bumper gift will be revealed at the end! 📅 Saturday, 10 October ⏱ 12 PM IST 👉 Register here: h…
Showing the 12 most recent of 946 posts we hold for @financetalkswithaman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
PF today?
- green✅43%
- red❗️44%
- flat 💫16%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Launching 5 slots offer today on the Academy.
- 25% off5%
- 30% off - Need minimum 150 votes before i launch97%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
When should we keep it?
- Next week Saturday. 10th October77%
- Next week Friday. 9th October27%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
PF today?
- Green41%
- Red43%
- Flat17%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Did you trade?
- yes16%
- no84%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
PF Today?
- green13%
- red80%
- flat8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 946 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Finance with Aman” (@financetalkswithaman), 28,798 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/financetalkswithaman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.