Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FICE Talk 🇺🇦

Supergroup

FICE Talk 🇺🇦

@fice_talk

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,495members

+196 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

711 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001494680687
TypeSupergroup
Username@fice_talk
CreatedBetween 1 May 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/fice_talk

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2991,5381,418.56 August 2026 — 1,299 members7 August 2026 — 1,303 members10 August 2026 — 1,369 members13 August 2026 — 1,394 members16 August 2026 — 1,423 members20 August 2026 — 1,435 members23 August 2026 — 1,451 members26 August 2026 — 1,467 members29 August 2026 — 1,486 members1 September 2026 — 1,499 members5 September 2026 — 1,505 members10 September 2026 — 1,502 members18 September 2026 — 1,503 members27 September 2026 — 1,525 members27 September 2026 — 1,525 members5 October 2026 — 1,538 members12 October 2026 — 1,495 members1,4956 August 202612 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 67 days, net +196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,263–1,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
12 Oct 2026, 12:401,495-43
5 Oct 2026, 17:211,538+13
27 Sept 2026, 23:071,525no change
27 Sept 2026, 22:391,525+22
18 Sept 2026, 09:011,503+1
10 Sept 2026, 10:141,502-3
5 Sept 2026, 06:011,505+6
1 Sept 2026, 12:261,499+13
29 Aug 2026, 13:491,486+19
26 Aug 2026, 13:441,467+16
23 Aug 2026, 15:261,451+16
20 Aug 2026, 00:181,435+12
16 Aug 2026, 22:071,423+29
13 Aug 2026, 10:251,394+25
10 Aug 2026, 09:551,369+66
7 Aug 2026, 02:071,303+4
6 Aug 2026, 22:071,299first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FICE Talk 🇺🇦” (@fice_talk), 1,495 members as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fice_talk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.