Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔥Jason’s Crypto World 🕵️

Channel

🔥Jason’s Crypto World 🕵️

@feidaojason

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,417subscribers

-653 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002478544845
TypeChannel
Username@feidaojason
Description分享交易心得?? 个人所有🔗 https://linktr.ee/jasonbtc
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/feidaojason

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,79622,07020,9337 August 2026 — 22,070 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,070 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,035 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,954 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,892 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,771 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,745 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,614 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,499 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,432 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,369 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,076 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,641 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,536 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,467 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,329 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,278 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,229 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,207 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,169 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,051 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,796 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,038 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,404 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,242 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,162 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,098 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,957 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,822 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,668 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,520 subscribers17 September 2026 — 20,456 subscribers19 September 2026 — 20,402 subscribers26 September 2026 — 20,227 subscribers4 October 2026 — 20,102 subscribers9 October 2026 — 21,417 subscribers21,4177 August 20269 October 2026
37 measurements spanning 62 days, net -653. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,455–22,411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 04:2021,417+1,315
4 Oct 2026, 14:4020,102-125
26 Sept 2026, 08:2120,227-175
19 Sept 2026, 08:3920,402-54
17 Sept 2026, 01:3920,456-64
15 Sept 2026, 03:3820,520-148
13 Sept 2026, 11:3720,668-154
11 Sept 2026, 11:5720,822-135
8 Sept 2026, 17:5820,957-141
5 Sept 2026, 09:4021,098-64
3 Sept 2026, 09:1921,162-80
2 Sept 2026, 04:0221,242-162
1 Sept 2026, 02:5821,404+1,366
31 Aug 2026, 03:4820,038+242
30 Aug 2026, 04:1319,796-255
29 Aug 2026, 06:5820,051-118
28 Aug 2026, 06:2320,169-38
27 Aug 2026, 08:3720,207-22
26 Aug 2026, 11:5420,229-49
25 Aug 2026, 11:3520,278first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.03%
avg views ÷ 21,417 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 101 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held101 (24 July 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total29,236
Reactions total879
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 17:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,820
Videos
≈59
Links
≈109

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,202 reactions across 97 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,62422.5%
🔥1,42519.8%
👍1,42419.8%
😁1,34918.7%
🎉1,34018.6%
👏240.333%
🥰110.153%
🐳30.042%
❤‍🔥10.014%
🫡10.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2026, 01:44 UTC124 views5 reactionsread 9 October 2026

刚刚10几个人过来问我A股什么情况。 我在这里统一回复你们一下。 1.我没说不行,就是行,怕个吊毛。 2.最新调整没有变化。 3.大盘调整,我们跟着顺便洗盘,与个股无关。 4.拿住就行,不要尝试做T,不然随时甩你下车 5.不动,就是最好的策略。 结果马上就要来了,最后再耐心一点。 😎😎😎😎

👍2❤1👏1🥰1

8 Oct 2026, 16:09 UTC171 views5 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

拼了。 我不信今年还有黑天鹅🔥🔥🔥

❤4🫡1

8 Oct 2026, 15:37 UTC174 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

好事全给我连上。🚀🚀🚀 我就不发扎眼的收益图了,以后只用数据说话。 顺便提醒大家,BTC跌不破8万,越接近越要小心了。👌👌

❤1

8 Oct 2026, 15:32 UTC170 views2 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

我每天都在做记录,再优化策略。 今天我盯了一天,因为趋势行情,机器人前置的识别系统必须针对趋势行情做出策略,调教之后的胜率大大提高,用数据说话,这就是量化分析,已经可以稳定盈利了,而且在盈亏比的覆盖下,利润非常可观…… 大家等着发财吧🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

❤2

8 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Forwarded from @JasonQuantCryptoPhoto

连上了……兄弟们📢📢🔥🔥🔥

🔥2❤1

8 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC155 views6 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

全球承压,不必惊慌。 都不是事,是事就一会儿 两天内反弹。📈📈📈📈

❤4👍2

7 Oct 2026, 15:26 UTC191 views13 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

什么叫长期稳定盈利? 看图我给大家算笔账。 用盈亏比去覆盖胜率就可以。 机器人🤖持续优化中…… 一成不变的策略无法应对风云变化的市场行情,所以我加入了3套策略分别应对趋势行情、震荡行情。策略分别是趋势跟随策略,震荡网格策略,关键位置回踩反弹反向策略。 我在短线策略功能中前置了一个扫描系统。 当我们点击短线策略按钮🔘的时候,系统会用毫秒级的速度对当前行情趋势进行识别,确认后选择一种应对方案出策略,胜率可以大大增加……后续可以做到更好。 欢迎观望的朋友来试用机器人🤖

❤7🐳3👏2😁1

7 Oct 2026, 12:56 UTC989 views11 reactionsread 9 October 2026

明日A股开盘了。 策略上有重大调整,时间节点有变化。大家注意自己私信,我只发一次。 不要错过最佳调整时机。😎

❤6🔥3👏1😁1

6 Oct 2026, 12:36 UTC755 views8 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Forwarded from @JasonQuantCrypto

🔥🔥10.6重要功能升级🔥🔥 在之前的策略中,结构评分不高的情况下,系统会根据当前行情趋势,判断方向,在震荡行情中为了满足盈亏比,容易上下打止损。 现升级为机构评分不高的策略以观望为主,同时系统会扫描全市场有机会的标的,最多给出3个候选标的。 大家自愿选择策略,机器人所有策略均为计算机计算结果,硬性止损是一定的,但是止盈大家觉得行情不好的时候手动平仓就是正确的。可以少赚,不能亏。 团队持续优化功能与策略,一起进步。😎

❤3🔥3🎉1👏1

6 Oct 2026, 12:36 UTC767 views8 reactionsread 9 October 2026

之前的策略是用户想做ETH,去点击短线策略的时候,系统虽然判定当前趋势偏多或者偏空,但是结构评分并不好。 现在是用户想做ETH,但是系统评分不好的时候建议观望,如果一个低质量的策略还不如不做。同时系统扫描全市场所有标的,评估后选出最多3个候选标的供大家选择。 人脑总比计算机知道人性人心,有些用户有其他工作,并不能一直盯盘,当自己有时间的时候想做单合约,过来一点没有合适的策略,就放弃了去做别的事情,这个时候行情来了,没有赶上。过段时间又有空过来点击策略,行情走完了。 为了改善这种尴尬,我们团队优化了一下从等待点击策略,到主动出击,主动去扫描全市场所有机会。从中作出最优的选择供大家参考,只是参考。当你觉得不好的时候,就真的是不好,人有感觉,计算机没有。 还是,一起加油做到最好吧。

❤3👍2👏1🔥1🥰1

6 Oct 2026, 04:17 UTC≈1,470 views7 reactionsread 9 October 2026

兄弟们,这个先平仓了。重新评估行情⚡️

❤2👍2🔥2👏1

6 Oct 2026, 02:01 UTC≈2,540 views8 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

昨日休息一天。 来,今天继续🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

❤4👍2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @feidaojason. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥Jason’s Crypto World 🕵️” (@feidaojason), 21,417 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feidaojason.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.