刚刚10几个人过来问我A股什么情况。 我在这里统一回复你们一下。 1.我没说不行,就是行,怕个吊毛。 2.最新调整没有变化。 3.大盘调整,我们跟着顺便洗盘,与个股无关。 4.拿住就行,不要尝试做T,不然随时甩你下车 5.不动,就是最好的策略。 结果马上就要来了,最后再耐心一点。 😎😎😎😎
👍2❤1👏1🥰1

Channel
@feidaojason
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,417subscribers
-653 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002478544845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feidaojason |
| Description | 分享交易心得?? 个人所有🔗 https://linktr.ee/jasonbtc |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feidaojason |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 21,417 | +1,315 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 20,102 | -125 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 20,227 | -175 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 20,402 | -54 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 20,456 | -64 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 20,520 | -148 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 20,668 | -154 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 20,822 | -135 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 20,957 | -141 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 21,098 | -64 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 21,162 | -80 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 21,242 | -162 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 21,404 | +1,366 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 20,038 | +242 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 19,796 | -255 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 20,051 | -118 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 20,169 | -38 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 20,207 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 20,229 | -49 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 20,278 | first reading |
101 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 101 (24 July 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 29,236 |
| Reactions total | 879 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 17:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,202 reactions across 97 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,624 | 22.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1,425 | 19.8% | |
| 👍 | 1,424 | 19.8% | |
| 😁 | 1,349 | 18.7% | |
| 🎉 | 1,340 | 18.6% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 0.333% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 0.153% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.042% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.014% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.014% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
刚刚10几个人过来问我A股什么情况。 我在这里统一回复你们一下。 1.我没说不行,就是行,怕个吊毛。 2.最新调整没有变化。 3.大盘调整,我们跟着顺便洗盘,与个股无关。 4.拿住就行,不要尝试做T,不然随时甩你下车 5.不动,就是最好的策略。 结果马上就要来了,最后再耐心一点。 😎😎😎😎
👍2❤1👏1🥰1
拼了。 我不信今年还有黑天鹅🔥🔥🔥
❤4🫡1
好事全给我连上。🚀🚀🚀 我就不发扎眼的收益图了,以后只用数据说话。 顺便提醒大家,BTC跌不破8万,越接近越要小心了。👌👌
❤1
我每天都在做记录,再优化策略。 今天我盯了一天,因为趋势行情,机器人前置的识别系统必须针对趋势行情做出策略,调教之后的胜率大大提高,用数据说话,这就是量化分析,已经可以稳定盈利了,而且在盈亏比的覆盖下,利润非常可观…… 大家等着发财吧🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
❤2
连上了……兄弟们📢📢🔥🔥🔥
🔥2❤1
全球承压,不必惊慌。 都不是事,是事就一会儿 两天内反弹。📈📈📈📈
❤4👍2
什么叫长期稳定盈利? 看图我给大家算笔账。 用盈亏比去覆盖胜率就可以。 机器人🤖持续优化中…… 一成不变的策略无法应对风云变化的市场行情,所以我加入了3套策略分别应对趋势行情、震荡行情。策略分别是趋势跟随策略,震荡网格策略,关键位置回踩反弹反向策略。 我在短线策略功能中前置了一个扫描系统。 当我们点击短线策略按钮🔘的时候,系统会用毫秒级的速度对当前行情趋势进行识别,确认后选择一种应对方案出策略,胜率可以大大增加……后续可以做到更好。 欢迎观望的朋友来试用机器人🤖
❤7🐳3👏2😁1
明日A股开盘了。 策略上有重大调整,时间节点有变化。大家注意自己私信,我只发一次。 不要错过最佳调整时机。😎
❤6🔥3👏1😁1
🔥🔥10.6重要功能升级🔥🔥 在之前的策略中,结构评分不高的情况下,系统会根据当前行情趋势,判断方向,在震荡行情中为了满足盈亏比,容易上下打止损。 现升级为机构评分不高的策略以观望为主,同时系统会扫描全市场有机会的标的,最多给出3个候选标的。 大家自愿选择策略,机器人所有策略均为计算机计算结果,硬性止损是一定的,但是止盈大家觉得行情不好的时候手动平仓就是正确的。可以少赚,不能亏。 团队持续优化功能与策略,一起进步。😎
❤3🔥3🎉1👏1
之前的策略是用户想做ETH,去点击短线策略的时候,系统虽然判定当前趋势偏多或者偏空,但是结构评分并不好。 现在是用户想做ETH,但是系统评分不好的时候建议观望,如果一个低质量的策略还不如不做。同时系统扫描全市场所有标的,评估后选出最多3个候选标的供大家选择。 人脑总比计算机知道人性人心,有些用户有其他工作,并不能一直盯盘,当自己有时间的时候想做单合约,过来一点没有合适的策略,就放弃了去做别的事情,这个时候行情来了,没有赶上。过段时间又有空过来点击策略,行情走完了。 为了改善这种尴尬,我们团队优化了一下从等待点击策略,到主动出击,主动去扫描全市场所有机会。从中作出最优的选择供大家参考,只是参考。当你觉得不好的时候,就真的是不好,人有感觉,计算机没有。 还是,一起加油做到最好吧。
❤3👍2👏1🔥1🥰1
兄弟们,这个先平仓了。重新评估行情⚡️
❤2👍2🔥2👏1
昨日休息一天。 来,今天继续🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
❤4👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @feidaojason. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥Jason’s Crypto World 🕵️” (@feidaojason), 21,417 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feidaojason.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.