Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔥Jason’s Crypto World 🕵️

Channel

🔥Jason’s Crypto World 🕵️

@feidaojason

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

20,467subscribers

-1,603 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002478544845
TypeChannel
Username@feidaojason
Description分享交易心得?? 个人所有🔗 https://linktr.ee/jasonbtc
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/feidaojason

Growth

20,46722,07021,268.57 August 2026 — 22,070 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,070 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,035 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,954 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,892 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,771 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,745 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,614 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,499 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,432 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,369 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,076 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,641 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,536 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,467 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1,603. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,227–22,310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 19:0720,467-69
21 Aug 2026, 11:5820,536-105
20 Aug 2026, 12:1320,641-435
19 Aug 2026, 13:0221,076-293
18 Aug 2026, 16:2221,369-63
17 Aug 2026, 13:2521,432-67
16 Aug 2026, 06:5521,499-115
14 Aug 2026, 16:3321,614-79
13 Aug 2026, 05:1821,693-52
12 Aug 2026, 08:0221,745-26
11 Aug 2026, 10:4621,771-121
10 Aug 2026, 08:3021,892-62
9 Aug 2026, 08:0221,954-81
8 Aug 2026, 08:0122,035-35
7 Aug 2026, 16:3022,070no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:2322,070first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.12%
avg views ÷ 20,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 57 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held58 (24 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total83,014
Reactions total4,429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,680
Videos
52
Links
95

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,429 reactions across 55 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
98822.3%
👍87619.8%
🔥86719.6%
😁85719.3%
🎉81818.5%
👏150.339%
🥰80.181%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

大家周末愉快。 整个周末我都在备战下周的大A市场。 目前已经准备就绪,明天好好休息一天。 下周是爆发的时刻,我很忐忑,又很不安,也很兴奋。 每当这种时刻的前夕,我都焦虑不安,彻夜难眠。 今年我的几个重点项目,即将就要完成一个,祝贺自己。 新的项目已经谈好,耐心等待。🤟

6

Signed JasonBTC

21 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

收到Bitget的飞行棋,很漂亮,哈哈😂

2

Signed JasonBTC

21 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC228 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

一个停板送给你们。 哥下班了,专心炒币。 BTC今日能否到达8万??

6

Signed JasonBTC

21 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 22 August 2026

一路不回头,冲啊 哥躺着给你们拉……😂😂

Signed JasonBTC

21 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 22 August 2026

看看A股大盘,再看看其他票,然后再看看我的。 你就知道什么叫做牛逼。 😂😂😂😂😂

Signed JasonBTC

20 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC≈1,110 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

早上好🌞 昨天收到了很多老朋友私信,问我这次是真牛市么。还不会跌什么的 在这里我做统一回复 我对牛市的定义是:横盘,不是下跌趋势,拉盘,流通性充足。 横盘=盘整 不是下跌趋势=不会引起螺旋下跌 拉盘=热钱关注 流通性充足=可以容纳大资金不会被交易所恶意狙击 1.8.19日,8.20日 两日成交量破了200亿,就是去年顶部129000 的时候也没有吧。 2.牛市这个市场的机会会无限多,大家还记得我去年做的doge币么。我的资源还在,一有消息会立刻给最信任我的朋友。不用担心 3.话说回来,因为我说牛市直接梭哈Btc回调个3000-5000爆仓的可别找我,我做的是投资不是赌博。 我的仓位管理能力,Btc跌倒50000我都不会亏钱。 越涨越赚这就是能力因为有币本位 所以未来可能会下跌,但涨是一定的。所以踏空的朋友们追高不用怕,针对内部会员我会全天24hour盯盘 给大家提供最健康的策略。根据每个人的抗风险能力提供仓位管理 如果你

5

Signed JasonBTC

20 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,090 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

美股如约起飞,美光科技,闪迪都开始冲了,所以,机会在这里,能不能把握住,都是看自己。别人着急有什么用???我着急,要是我直接给你们梭哈了。 黄金今晚要挑战4700,来吧,兄弟们??牛市就是这样,你还没准备好,行情已经走了快一半。据说昨天开始c2c已经都涨价了,一U难求,所以准备好,差不少,说话之间就开单了。 哈哈,祝大家发财。🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

3

Signed JasonBTC

20 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,110 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026

行情又来了啊😁 看看这波能死多少人😂😂 大家注意安全🚀🚀🚀

🔥5🎉2😁1

Signed JasonBTC

20 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC≈2,000 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

知道以太坊想到5000有多难吗?? 每一个蓝色的线都是压力位,要一关关闯过去。 所以即使牛市,你能承受的了其中的波动吗?? 有人说,好难。 我告诉你,这是以太坊,还难吗? 去看看他怎么从1300拉到4900的。

5👏2👍1😁1

Signed JasonBTC

20 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC≈1,960 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026

对于一个投资来说,2个月的时间都坚持不了,我不知道你原来都是做什么的?抢劫??盗窃??这个最快。 越急功近利,越死的最惨。 我宁愿一年有30%的收益,稳定的,我已经很满足。 那你们想要一个月200%的收益,你何德何能???🈶

3👍2🎉1👏1

Signed JasonBTC

20 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC≈1,970 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026

事情是这样的,不是我爱发火,是有些人太气人。 今早,我去问一些人6月份买1580的以太坊,起飞了,赚了多少? 回答我:哥,一个月都没涨,我给卖了。 我又问一些人,股票赚多少了?还是差了多少回血? 回答我:哥,我害怕,不知道哪里是底,割肉了,现在进还来得及吗? 我又问一些人,手里之前让减仓止损的,处理了吗? 回答我:还在扛着,没有钱做ETH了…… 我没有再回复这些人,也不想再回复了,真的很没意思。因为这些人从头到尾就没听过我的话,也从没相信过我,那么我再跟你说话,就是对我自己的不尊重,罢了罢了。 我时间精力有限,而且最近大A到了收尾时刻,我实在生不起这个气,自己走自己的路吧。 我说的以上问题,都问问自己,有没有犯这样的错误,如果有,尽快改掉,不然,在这个市场,能灰溜溜退出是最好的下场。🤔🤔🤔

2🎉1👍1🥰1

Signed JasonBTC

20 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC≈1,970 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026

A股科技股起飞了,美股起飞就在今天晚上。目前最有性价比的合约 市价做多MU,950附近 止损前低 止盈1111 利好落地最后一个市场,抓不抓,你自己定。🔥🔥🔥

7👏1🥰1

Signed JasonBTC

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @feidaojason. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥Jason’s Crypto World 🕵️” (@feidaojason), 20,467 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feidaojason.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.