Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اقتباسات • ملحدين

Channel

اقتباسات • ملحدين

@f44SQ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,230subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001674000985
TypeChannel
Username@f44SQ
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/f44SQ

Growth

1,2301,2331,231.520 Aug 2026, 18:01 — 1,233 subscribers20 Aug 2026, 18:15 — 1,233 subscribers21 Aug 2026, 05:54 — 1,230 subscribers20 Aug 2026, 18:0121 Aug 2026, 05:54
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,230–1,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 05:541,230-3
20 Aug 2026, 18:151,233no change
20 Aug 2026, 18:011,233first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.80%
avg views ÷ 1,230 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 September 202519 August 2026)
Views total288
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC27 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

لقد كان الدين عبر كل الأزمان معادٍ للإنسان، ومعادٍ للمرأة، ومعادٍ للحياة، ومعادٍ للسلام، ومعادٍ للعقل، ومعادٍ للعلم. لقد كانت فكرة الإله ضارة ليس فقط للبشرية بل بالأرض. وقد حان الوقت الآن للعقل والثقافة والعلوم لتولي المسؤولية." ‏ Madalyn Murray O'Hair

14 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC99 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

لا يُزعجني إيمانك بأيّ إله، لكن ما سيُزعجني حقًا هو استسلامك لهذا الإيمان. لقد جعلت إلهك إجابةً لجميع الأسئلة، حتى انعدم فضولك لمعرفة كيف تمّ أيّ شيء. لقد توقفت عن البحث والتعلّم، وبالتالي أنا لا أحتاجك معي في المختبر؛ لقد أصبحت عديم الفائدة ولا نفع لك. — نيل تايسون

5 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC162 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

عندما تشعر بالغباء تذكّر أن هناك حوالي مليار و 800 مليون شخص يؤمنون بأن النجوم سوف تسقُط وتتناثر على الأرض عندما يقترب يوم القيامة.

23 Jul 2026, 21:42 UTC239 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

"لم يقف إله بجانبي،لم يعمل على تلطيف قلبي، أنا الذي خدم الآلهة ليل نهار، ماذا جنيت من جهودي؟" ضمن مرثية للملك اورنمو 2112 - 2095 قبل الميلاد.

10 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC283 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

كم أكرهُ تِلك اللحظات ، عِندما كنتُ أبكي لِساعاتٍ وَ اُردّدُ التَفاهات تضرّعًا مُتذلّلًا طالبًِا المُساعَدة مِن قبورٍ لا تنفعُ وَلا تَضُر إعتقدتُ أنّها أقربُ سَبيلٍ بيني وَبينَ الأب المُطلَق (الإلـٰه) الّذي كنتُ أعتقدُ انّهُ الحَق وَحملتُ السِلاح لأجل الدِفاع عَن القبور ! - عبدُالرحمـٰن خالـِد

6 Jun 2026, 21:37 UTC643 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

ليست الحجج العقلية بل الانفعالات ، ما يدفع الناس للإيمان بالحياة الآخرة - برتراند راسل

2 Jun 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

في أحد الايام عندما كنت اصلي ، اكتشفت فجأة أنني أتحدث مع نفسي - بيتر أوتول

21 Apr 2026, 21:56 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

لقد استنزفنا الدين! أضاع أوقاتنا، واستهلك عقولنا، واستغل مجهودنا. وسواء كنا نؤمن به ونمارسه، أو نكفر به وننتقده، فهو يستنزفنا! لابد من تحرير أنفسنا من لعنة الدين، مؤمنين كنا أو كافرين. - أبن العلي - مؤلف كتاب إدراك الوهم: تأملات في دين محمد

20 Feb 2026, 22:16 UTC845 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

لوح أشوري من القرن التاسع ق.م يظهر رجل وهو يؤدي صلاة رفع اليد وهي احد انواع الصلاة في بلاد الرافدين والتي تكون برفع اليد الى الفم وترتيل الدعاء للآلهة بصوت مسموع لطلب الرحمة والمغفرة History of Mesopotamia

21 Jan 2026, 21:25 UTC962 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«كل محاولة للمعرفة تدمر نفس الشيء الذي نسعى لدراسته، وتجعله مختلفاً تماماً، ثم يتعين علينا أن نكرر محاولاتنا ونواجه مرة أخرى شيئاً مختلفاً تماماً في طبيعته - وسيستمر هذا حتى ندرك شيئاً مطلقاً متأصلاً في كل واحد منا، وتدمير الفرق بين المعنى والهراء. منذ ألفين ونصف ألف عام، فهم الإنسان هذا وأخبر العالم عنه. منذ ذلك الحين، اكتشفنا المزيد والمزيد من القوانين الجديدة، في محاولة لحل المهام التي وضعتها الحياة أمامنا، لكننا

15 Dec 2025, 21:25 UTC996 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

إن المسيحي الذي يأكل السمك يوم الجمعة يبتسم من رؤية مسلم يرفض أكل لحم الخنزير ،و سيتهزئ من اليهودي وهو يرد القشريات ، و ينظر المتعبد اليهودي الذي يهزهز أمام حائط المبكى باندهاش للمسيحي الجاثي قبالة مركعه ، و في الوقت الذي يطرح المسلم سجادة الصلاة صوب الكعبة ! ومع ذلك فلا أحد بينهم يستنتج أن القشة في نظر الجار تساوي العارضة في نظره هو . -ميشيل أونفري

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @f44SQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أضحك من قلبك ، نكت 😂
@hhgkvhnk · 68,502
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اقتباسات • ملحدين” (@f44SQ), 1,230 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f44SQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.