Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Indian Evidence Act 1872 Quiz

Channel

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Quiz

@evidence_law_quiz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,527subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001538807464
TypeChannel
Username@evidence_law_quiz
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/evidence_law_quiz

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5271,5431,53514 August 2026 — 1,543 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,543 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,542 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,539 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,536 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,537 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,536 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,534 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,531 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,527 subscribers14 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 33 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,525–1,545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 11:551,527-4
12 Sept 2026, 14:171,531-3
8 Sept 2026, 02:221,534-2
3 Sept 2026, 00:371,536-1
30 Aug 2026, 23:431,537+1
24 Aug 2026, 14:171,536-3
20 Aug 2026, 23:521,539-3
18 Aug 2026, 06:261,542-1
15 Aug 2026, 12:231,543no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:461,543first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC11 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

An expert may give an account of experiments performed by him for the purpose of forming his opinion. This is an illustration of:

  1. A) Section 3922%
  2. B) Section 4132%
  3. C) Section 4322%
  4. D) Section 4524%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

13 Aug 2026, 01:13 UTC16 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

According to Section 45, whenever the opinion of any living person is relevant, what else is also relevant?

  1. A) The person's age4%
  2. B) The grounds on which such opinion is based80%
  3. C) The person's educational qualifications12%
  4. D) The person's criminal record5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

12 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC18 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

The question is whether A and B were married. The fact that they were usually received and treated by their friends as husband and wife is relevant under which section?

  1. A) Section 4215%
  2. B) Section 4334%
  3. C) Section 4442%
  4. D) Section 459%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

11 Aug 2026, 00:58 UTC26 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

Under the proviso to Section 44, an opinion on relationship is not sufficient to prove a marriage in prosecutions under Sections 82 and 84 of which Act?

  1. A) Indian Penal Code, 18609%
  2. B) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 202359%
  3. C) Code of Criminal Procedure, 197312%
  4. D) Indian Evidence Act, 187219%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

10 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC27 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

According to the proviso in Section 44, an opinion on relationship shall NOT be sufficient to prove a marriage in proceedings under the:

  1. A) Hindu Marriage Act, 195536%
  2. B) Special Marriage Act, 195432%
  3. C) Indian Succession Act, 192514%
  4. D) Divorce Act, 186918%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

9 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC36 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

Under Section 44, when the Court has to form an opinion as to the relationship of one person to another, an opinion expressed by conduct is relevant if given by:

  1. A) A member of the family or any person who has special means of knowledge on the subject84%
  2. B) Only the immediate parents9%
  3. C) Any random neighbor5%
  4. D) A police officer2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

7 Aug 2026, 00:37 UTC58 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

Under Section 43, when the Court has to form an opinion as to the meaning of words or terms used in particular districts, whose opinions are relevant?

  1. A) Linguists only5%
  2. B) Persons having special means of knowledge thereon85%
  3. C) The general public8%
  4. D) The authors of dictionaries2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

6 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC51 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

The right of the villagers of a particular village to use the water of a particular well is an example of a "general right" within the meaning of which section?

  1. A) Section 4016%
  2. B) Section 4137%
  3. C) Section 4235%
  4. D) Section 4312%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

5 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC48 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

According to the Explanation in Section 42, the expression "general custom or right" includes:

  1. A) Customs strictly limited to one family4%
  2. B) Rights exclusive to a single property owner13%
  3. C) Customs or rights common to any considerable class of persons81%
  4. D) Contracts between two private businesses2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

4 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC53 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawstudenPoll

When the Court has to form an opinion as to the existence of any general custom or right under Section 42, whose opinions are relevant?

  1. A) Only government gazetted officers7%
  2. B) Persons who would be likely to know of its existence if it existed85%
  3. C) Only the elders of a community5%
  4. D) Legal scholars2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @evidence_law_quiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTCAnonymous Quiz219 voters

An expert may give an account of experiments performed by him for the purpose of forming his opinion. This is an illustration of:

  1. A) Section 3922%
  2. B) Section 4132%
  3. C) Section 4322%
  4. D) Section 4524%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 01:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz330 voters

According to Section 45, whenever the opinion of any living person is relevant, what else is also relevant?

  1. A) The person's age4%
  2. B) The grounds on which such opinion is based80%
  3. C) The person's educational qualifications12%
  4. D) The person's criminal record5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz414 voters

The question is whether A and B were married. The fact that they were usually received and treated by their friends as husband and wife is relevant under which section?

  1. A) Section 4215%
  2. B) Section 4334%
  3. C) Section 4442%
  4. D) Section 459%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 00:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz442 voters

Under the proviso to Section 44, an opinion on relationship is not sufficient to prove a marriage in prosecutions under Sections 82 and 84 of which Act?

  1. A) Indian Penal Code, 18609%
  2. B) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 202359%
  3. C) Code of Criminal Procedure, 197312%
  4. D) Indian Evidence Act, 187219%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz516 voters

According to the proviso in Section 44, an opinion on relationship shall NOT be sufficient to prove a marriage in proceedings under the:

  1. A) Hindu Marriage Act, 195536%
  2. B) Special Marriage Act, 195432%
  3. C) Indian Succession Act, 192514%
  4. D) Divorce Act, 186918%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz452 voters

Under Section 44, when the Court has to form an opinion as to the relationship of one person to another, an opinion expressed by conduct is relevant if given by:

  1. A) A member of the family or any person who has special means of knowledge on the subject84%
  2. B) Only the immediate parents9%
  3. C) Any random neighbor5%
  4. D) A police officer2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Target Study IQ
@targetstudyiq · 109,266
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
UPSC Polity PSIR Notes
@UPSC_Polity_PSIR_Notes · 34,145
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
PW Law Wallah JUDICIARY
@pwlawwallah · 84,878
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Indian Evidence Act 1872 Quiz” (@evidence_law_quiz), 1,527 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evidence_law_quiz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.