@Esteghlall
Signed ●▬▬๑۩۩๑💙Nima💙๑۩۩๑▬▬●

Channel
@esteghlalti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001358702762 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @esteghlalti |
| Description | به نام خدا جهت ارتباط با مدیر کانال به آیدی زیر مراجعه فرمایید Nima6927@ |
| Created | 22 February 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/esteghlalti |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
6 posts held, back to 22 February 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
@Esteghlall
Signed ●▬▬๑۩۩๑💙Nima💙๑۩۩๑▬▬●
Channel name was changed to «👑استقلالته👑»
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «استقلال تهران»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @esteghlalti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@esteghlalti named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“👑استقلالته👑” (@esteghlalti). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esteghlalti.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.