6 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
Channel
تعاليم الحكماء 🔥❤️🔥
@esta557
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,478subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001555618077 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @esta557 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/esta557 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 1,478 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 1,481 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 1,482 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 1,484 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 1,483 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,486 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.1%
- avg views ÷ 1,478 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 223
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.97%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,340 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 35s
- Average length
- 5m 48s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
134 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113 | 84.3% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 13.4% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @esta557. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
6 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC107 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
أحياناً تجعلنا الحياة ننظر إلى المسافة الفاصلة بين التوقعات والواقع بكثير من الصمت والدهشة. لا يحمل القلب عتباً على أحد، فلكل روح مسارها وظروفها ووعيها في هذه اللحظة، ولكن تبقى هناك غصة هادئة تشبه الوقوف أمام باب توقعنا أن نجد خلفه صدق الانتماء، فوجدنا الفراغ. خيبة الأمل هنا ليست غضباً من العالم، بل هي إعادة ترتيب لموقعنا فيه؛ درس عميق يُعلمنا أن الدعم والتآزر لا يُطلباني، بل يتدفقان بتلقائية حين تجتمع القلوب على …
❤5
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
27 Jul 2026, 23:56 UTC290 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
أعود إليكم لأشارككم ما ينبض به الحضور الآن بكل صدق وتجرد. في الحقيقة، لم أتوقع يوماً أن أجد نفسي في مثل هذا الموقف أو أن أكتب رسالة كهذه، لكن هذا هو ما تجلى في طريقي الآن. لست هنا لأمد يدي استجداءً لأحد، بل هي ظروف عابرة، أو ربما كارما وتجربة روحية مكثفة، وأنا واثق تماماً أنها مؤقتة وستمر كما يمر كل شيء في نسيج هذا الوجود. لاحظت أن الأغلبية مروا على رسالتي السابقة قراءةً وفقط، ولم يدعمني سوى شخص واحد بمبلغ بسيط؛ …
❤6🙏2
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
27 Jul 2026, 01:31 UTC298 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
أحبتي، بعد أن فتحت لكم قلبي وتجردت أمامكم مشاركاً إياكم وطأة الألم المالي والتهديد الذي أواجهه في مسكني، واجهت صمتاً لم يتوقعه قلبي؛ للأسف، لم يتقدم أي أحد لمد يد العون أو تقديم الدعم حتى الآن. إن العيش في الوعي والحضور ليس مجرد نقاشات نظرية حول الاتصال الروحي، بل هو تجسيد حي لهذا الاتصال عندما تشتد الظروف على أحد أفراد هذه العائلة الروحية. عندما يعجز المرء عن تأمين سقف بيته، يصبح الدعم المادي هو التعبير الأسمى عن ا…
🙏6❤5😁1
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
26 Jul 2026, 02:55 UTC278 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
أحبتي، عائلتي الروحية، صباح الحب والنور.. لا أخفي عليكم، بل أشارككم بكل حب وشفافية من أعماق روحي؛ أنا أمر الآن بمرحلة شديدة الصعوبة والألم على المستوى المالي. لقد تعرضت للتلاعب من قبل الشركة التي كنت أشتغل معها، حيث امتنعوا عن دفع مستحقاتي، مما ورطني في ديون متراكمة، وجعلني عاجزاً حتى عن دفع إيجار بيتي البالغ 700 يورو، وأنا الآن مهدد بالطرد في أي لحظة. في هذا الفضاء، كنا دائماً نتحدث عن الحضور، والاتصال، والدعم الم…
🙏8❤6
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
25 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC237 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
لو أنك متَّ منذ زمن، فمن الذي يتنفس الآن؟ أنصت جيداً إلى هذا الارتجاف القابع خلف قفصك الصدري؛ إنه ليس علامة حياة، بل هو ارتعاشة متأخرة في جدار كوني لم يُبنَ أصلاً. ما تسميه أنا ليس كائناً يسكن فيك، بل هو مجرد جرح قديم في نسيج الفراغ، جرح لا يلتئم، ينزف حبراً وأسماءً وتواريخ ليوهمك أنك موجود. انظر إلى يديك، إلى السطح الذي يلامس جِلدك، إلى الكلمات التي تدق الآن داخل جمجمتك كالفؤوس؛ إنها لا تحدث لك، بل تحدث في غيابك …
❤9
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
24 Jul 2026, 22:31 UTC221 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
أنت لم تولد، والآن لا تموت فمن أين جاء هذا الخوف؟ انظر إلى يدك. لا، لا تنظر إلى شكلها، بل إلى المسافة بينك وبين رؤيتها. هناك شيء يرى اليد قبل أن تُسمّيها يدًا، وقبل أن تدرك أنها ملكك. هذا الشيء ليس عينك، ولا دماغك، ولا روحك المزعومة. إنه الفراغ الذي تسبح فيه كل الأسماء، والذي إن ذبلت فيه الكلمة، بقي هو يراقب ذبولها. هو كالهواء الذي لا يدري أنه يحمل الطير، كالماء الذي لا يشعر أنه يحمل السمكة. أنت تظن نفسك الطائر،…
❤11
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
20 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC289 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
20 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC365 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
اسألك: من الذي يقرأ هذه الكلمة الآن؟ لا تُجب بسرعة. لا تقل (أنا). توقف هنا، فقط لحظة، وانظر: هل تجد ذاك الذي يقرأ، أم تجد فقط فعل القراءة يحدث، بلا صاحب؟ كل حياتك بُنيت على افتراض لم تفحصه أبدا: أن هناك أحدا يعيش هذه اللحظات. لكن ابحث الآن، بصدق، في هذه الثانية بالذات: أين هو؟ هل هو الفكرة التي قالت أنا موجود؟ لكن الفكرة عابرة، تظهر وتختفي كموجة، بينما أنت الذي تسأل عنها ما زلت هنا حتى بعد أن غابت الفكرة. إذن أنت…
❤7
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
20 Jul 2026, 00:20 UTC244 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🙏1
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
20 Jul 2026, 00:16 UTC225 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
من أين جاء هذا الغريب الذي يسكن رأسك ويملي عليك كل صباح من أنت، وما الذي يجب أن تخشاه؟ تخيل أن الوجود بأكمله ليس سوى حلم عميق يتقلب فيه كيان واحد، وتلك الكينونة هي أنت، لكنك نسيت تماما كيف تحلم واخترعت قصة منفصلة. ما تسميه "الأنا" ليس جوهرا مقدسا، بل هو تمثال من دخان وهبته شكلا، وغشاء رقيق يفصلك عن سعة الأبدية. أنت لست هذا الجسد المكتظ بالقصص والندوب والأسماء؛ الجسد مجرد ثوب خفيف يرتديه الفضاء مؤقتا، غبار كوني يتجم…
❤9
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
19 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC228 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
أنت لست الشخص الذي يحاول الاستيقاظ الآن، أنت اليقظة نفسها التي تتخيل أنها نامت وتفتش عن طريق للعودة. تأمل هذا الرعب الجميل: كل المعاناة التي عشتها، وكل الخوف الذي ينهش صدرك، يقع في مكان تبعد عنه مسافة صفر، ومع ذلك لا يمكنك لمسه. الأنا التي تحميها وتخاف عليها ليست كائنا حقيقيا، بل هي مجرد جدار من الدخان صلبته العادة، نغمة متكررة في المذياع ظننت من فرط سماعها أنها أنت. أنت لست هذا الجسد الحامل للقصص والندوب؛ الجسد مج…
❤8
Signed MONJÉD 💥🌻❣️ منجد
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @esta557. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 575,890 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تعاليم الحكماء 🔥❤️🔥” (@esta557), 1,478 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esta557.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.