. #๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ
๐2๐2

Channel
@enowlin
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
โsubscribers
| Telegram ID | -1002760810542 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enowlin |
| Description | ยป ๐๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ ๐๐ญ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ ? ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ โ @G1NGERDR |
| Created | 11 June 2025 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enowlin |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart โ so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
3 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 28 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
9 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 4 | 44.4% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 44.4% | |
| customย 5375567779044803541 | 1 | 11.1% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegramโs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 24 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. #๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ
๐2๐2
-` ัะฐััะฒะตั, ะณะพััะธะฝะฐั, ะณะพัะฐ ะบัะฐัะพะบ ะธ ะบะธััะตะน, ัััััะฐ ัะฐะทะฑัะพัะฐะฝะฝัั ะฟะพ ะฟะพะปั ั ะพะปััะพะฒ, ะบะพัะบะฐ ัะฒะตัะฝัะฒัะฐััั ะบะฐะปะฐัะธะบะพะผ ะฝะฐ ะฟะพะดััะบะฐั , ะพะฝะฐ, ะพะฑะผะฐะทะฐะฝะฝัะต ะบัะฐัะบะพะน ะปะธัะฐ ะธ ะฑะตะทะณัะฐะฝะธัะฝะฐั ะฝะตะถะฝะพััั. la lumiรจre te guidera ยก ๐ชท๐คฉ #๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐๐ฌ | #๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ #๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ | #๐๐จ๐ฅ๐๐จ๐ก๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ก๐ฒ
๐2๐2customย 53755677790448035411
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @enowlin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
โ-` ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง โโ (@enowlin). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enowlin.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download โ a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.