Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Enfocados Fijas

Channel

Enfocados Fijas

@enfocaobets

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,570subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002147015656
TypeChannel
Username@enfocaobets
CreatedBetween 1 February 2024 and 31 July 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/enfocaobets

Growth

14,57014,61314,591.55 September 2026 — 14,613 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,613 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,613 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,570 subscribers5 September 20267 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 2 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,564–14,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 09:1614,570-43
5 Sept 2026, 12:2214,613no change
5 Sept 2026, 12:2214,613no change
5 Sept 2026, 11:4714,613first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4282.4%
611.8%
🎅11.96%
👏11.96%
🙏11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jun 2026, 00:30 UTC≈2,010 views0 reactionsread 5 September 2026

mmm no veo muchas reacciones lo pensare hasta mañana para las jugadas del mundial

23 Jun 2026, 17:04 UTC≈2,070 views42 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Poll

VOLVEMOS A LAS JUGADAS GRATUITAS? 🚀

  1. SIIII95%
  2. VIP NOMAS8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥42

30 May 2026, 15:07 UTC≈3,460 views2 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

https://www.betano.pe/bookingcode/K768MBNG

2

30 May 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,000 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

https://www.betano.pe/bookingcode/SBPQ7TYU

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enfocaobets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jun 2026, 17:04 UTCAnonymous Poll223 voters

VOLVEMOS A LAS JUGADAS GRATUITAS? 🚀

  1. SIIII95%
  2. VIP NOMAS8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 May 2026, 21:50 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

DECIDAN USTEDES EL PARTIDO

  1. Boca83%
  2. Cruzeiro13%
  3. América13%
  4. Alianza Atlético10%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 24 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LAS JIJAS 🍫
@repartobetsperu · 124,576
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Enfocados Fijas” (@enfocaobets), 14,570 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enfocaobets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.