Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for enchantresses✨

Channel

enchantresses✨

@enchantressesclub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,918subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001522172644
TypeChannel
Username@enchantressesclub
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/enchantressesclub

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9182,9462,9329 August 2026 — 2,946 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,946 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,942 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,943 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,941 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,937 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,931 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,925 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,929 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,931 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,924 subscribers24 September 2026 — 2,918 subscribers9 August 202624 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 47 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,914–2,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 21:592,918-6
16 Sept 2026, 17:192,924-7
12 Sept 2026, 10:012,931+2
8 Sept 2026, 05:352,929+4
30 Aug 2026, 16:162,925-6
27 Aug 2026, 23:142,931-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:532,937-4
21 Aug 2026, 13:542,941-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:362,943+1
12 Aug 2026, 20:332,942-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:222,946no change
9 Aug 2026, 06:302,946first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,789 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,59657.2%
❤‍🔥37113.3%
💋1956.99%
😍1565.59%
🔥1284.59%
🥰913.26%
💯903.23%
⚡481.72%
🍾421.51%
🏆371.33%
🤩281.00%
🎉70.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,789 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @enchantressesclub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 March 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC985 views156 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Одного решения всегда достаточно. Манифестация мгновенна. Но только если вы действительно соответствуете этому решению и размышляете обо всём в соответствии с ним. Потому что намерение «я богата» проявляется мгновенно. Но и мысль «у меня ничего не получается» тоже. P.S. Если сложно, то «я стану богатой оч скоро» тоже подойдет.

❤110🍾21🏆14❤‍🔥11

31 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC991 views139 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Напоминание: Если решаете, аффирмируете, что вы: • Горячо любимы • Невероятно богаты • Безумно успешны • Идеально красивы А после акта визуализации/медитации/аффирмаций продолжаете думать: • Почему он/она мне не пишет • Нужно устроиться на ещё одну работу • Почему у меня не получается • Нужно сделать пластику… Вы что-то не то манифестируете.

❤97💯21🤩9🏆8❤‍🔥4

28 Jul 2026, 00:45 UTC≈1,470 views77 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Застой в манифестации?

🥰49❤17❤‍🔥7🏆2🤩2

25 Jul 2026, 01:02 UTC≈1,980 views100 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Шпаргалка для игнора 3д

❤74❤‍🔥16💋9🏆1

20 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC≈2,600 views96 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Ещё немного про общие убеждения

❤64❤‍🔥21💯7🏆4

20 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC≈2,480 views112 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Почему долго не получается что-то проявить и что с этим делать? Киви

❤85❤‍🔥20💯5🏆2

7 Jul 2026, 05:25 UTC≈3,080 views108 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Дополнялочка (ведь в моменте разговора я не умею думать, и в приоритете быть прикольной, хорошо?) Твое пространство и твоё "Я" реагирует не просто на твои мысли, но и на твои убеждения. Раньше я придерживалась другого мнения: мысли = источник. Сейчас же я считаю иначе: убеждения = источник. Однако мыслями ты можешь менять убеждения, и на это потребуется концентрация на желаемом убеждении и режим наблюдателя (чтоб…

❤65⚡22❤‍🔥14💋6😍1

7 Jul 2026, 04:59 UTC≈2,090 views74 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

•Stasi о том, что себя сдерживать не нужно (держание ведёт к недержанию) ❤️🧡💛

❤43🤩14💋11❤‍🔥4😍2

21 Jun 2026, 16:45 UTC≈3,080 views184 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Интересная это вещь... Перемещение через пространства. В один момент ты здесь, на улице Юности, д.32, кв. 237, но в то же время ты в другом месте. Я имею ввиду, мысленно. Ты лежишь в кроватке в своей квартирке, но мысленно ты находишься где-нибудь в автобусе, вспоминая тот забавный конфликт с кондуктором, который встал не с той ноги. Вроде физически ты в мягкой постели, а ментально в автобусе. И вот ты поживаешь …

❤117💋27❤‍🔥23🔥10😍6⚡1

20 Jun 2026, 02:07 UTC≈2,830 views317 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Короче, не долби себе мозги. Внешность, отношения, денежки, путешествия, - все это ты можешь ПРЕДСТАВИТЬ в своей голове. И как мы знаем: если это можно ПРЕДСТАВИТЬ, то это СУЩЕСТВУЕТ. Небольшой челленж. Вот ты представь, как пересчитываешь пятитысячные купюры вместо того, чтобы считать овечек перед сном. Представь эти ощущения от бумажных денег. Смотри на эти купюры в своем воображении. Своего рода SATS получаетс…

❤200❤‍🔥53⚡25💯12🔥11🏆6🎉5💋3

31 May 2026, 21:31 UTC≈3,010 views130 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Кто или что мешает нам проявлять желаемое И почему это занимает время

💋72❤34🔥12❤‍🔥9💯3

26 May 2026, 23:23 UTC≈3,580 views144 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Немного инфы, а следом пост! ИНФА: Хотела выразить вам благодарность за поддержку в комментариях! Это очень ценно🥰 Я рада, что мы с девочками смогли собрать такое уютное комьюнити единомышленников! Если у вас остались вопросы относительно теории, а не конкретных ситуаций, задавайте их в комментариях. На какие-то отвечу развернуто на канале. По поводу конкретных ситуаций тоже задавайте без стеснения, в комментари…

❤98❤‍🔥30💋8🔥6🍾1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enchantressesclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“enchantresses✨” (@enchantressesclub), 2,918 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enchantressesclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.