Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 113.1%
- avg views ÷ 1,611 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,820
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.16%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 29
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 00s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
67 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
13 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC355 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Photo
🎰 红榜恩灿老师200优惠券
📮 参与条件:
🪪 必须设置用户名
🎫 加入-恩灿满满的爱🏠❤️
🎫 加入-西安教务榜
🎫 加入-西安报告榜
🎫 加入-西安探花阁(修车交流)
└ 🎟️ 发言数大于 20 条
🎁 奖品内容:
💰️ 100优惠券 × 3
💰️ 200优惠券 × 2
💰️ 8.8现金红包 × 3
⚠️ 抽奖说明:
中奖请在24小时内联系老师进行兑换
使用期限:五天内有效
(可以跟老师协商具体时间跟期限)
所有解释权归西安探花阁所有
注意:优惠券以老师的课表为准,不能叠加使用
记得出击回来写车评
兑奖老师:@encan00987
🔋 人品加成:⚡️× 9 规则
📅 开奖日期:(北京时间)
2026年11月17日 12时00分00秒
❤1
13 Nov 2026, 10:53 UTC361 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Video
夜课有空哦
🤣1
Channel name was changed to «恩灿满满的爱🏠❤️»
8 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,260 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Photo
夜课今天有空了哦!
❤1
Channel name was changed to «恩灿的后花园»
4 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC≈2,060 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰1
3 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC≈2,000 viewsread 13 November 2026 Video
5点开课各位老公们
30 Oct 2026, 03:17 UTC≈2,500 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Video
今天4点开课呦
❤4👍1😍1
29 Oct 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,290 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Video
爱这种事,不但要多说,还要多做
😍4❤1
28 Oct 2026, 05:01 UTC≈2,200 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Video
哥哥想你了,
想和你一起研究"个"字结构
❤2
25 Oct 2026, 13:16 UTC≈2,610 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Video
Video, posted without a caption
❤8
24 Oct 2026, 17:51 UTC≈2,580 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Photo
【时间】:2026-10-24
【老师】:恩灿
【留名】:缔恺(黑化版)
【人照】:9
【颜值】:9
【身材】:9.1
【服务】:10
【态度】:10
【环境】:10
【综合】:9.52
【过程】:不是很想叼狗湿滴劳z,但还是要给我家灿灿写个车评。
颜值:人照9分。其实想给更高,八成是看习惯了。
身材:160/95上下,最近瘦了点,不过奈奈有了点。给我说是自己洗澡时候猛揉。
态度:无fuck说。我能睡八百遍。
服务:没叫跳小骚舞。看小野猫看烦可能。口活一线,摇摇车选手。
环境:我开的房上门我给个10分不过分吧,虽然课室也很不错。
过程:提前预订红休完首夜上门。
楼下小小一只,在摊旁边站着,上去一把搂住。已经快发展成小情侣的感觉了,挽着我的手上楼。电梯里就开始抱抱亲亲了。
提前做好夜宵,等灿灿来,进房间就被扑倒在床,拥吻了一会,菜快凉了,抱起来去餐桌先吃饭小酌了一会。(哥的打法你们学不会,别学)
灿灿的口活还是依旧顶,被吃的感觉魂…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @encan000987. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“恩灿满满的爱🏠❤️” (@encan000987), 1,611 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/encan000987.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.