Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥73custom 520890162036815957522💋16🔥9🥰1

Channel
@en_nead
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,796subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001204246961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @en_nead |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/en_nead |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 4,796 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:53 | 4,794 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 4,799 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 4,803 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 4,805 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 4,806 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 4,809 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 4,813 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 4,816 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 4,818 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 4,816 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,538 reactions across 15 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 1,519 | 59.9% | |
| 🔥 | 339 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5208901620368159575 | 177 | 6.97% | |
| 🙉 | 167 | 6.58% | |
| 💋 | 93 | 3.66% | |
| 👏 | 58 | 2.29% | |
| 🥰 | 35 | 1.38% | |
| 🍌 | 26 | 1.02% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 1.02% | |
| 🤣 | 25 | 0.985% | |
| 🍾 | 14 | 0.552% | |
| 😎 | 11 | 0.433% | |
| 😨 | 9 | 0.355% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 0.315% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 0.276% | |
| 🆒 | 6 | 0.236% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.236% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.197% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.118% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.079% | |
| 1 further kind | 2 | 0.079% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @en_nead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥73custom 520890162036815957522💋16🔥9🥰1
➖🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠➖ ❕#2_сезон #1_сезон❕ ➡️ПЕРЕРЫВ НА НЕОПРЕДЕЛЕННЫЙ ПЕРИОД⬅️ ⭐️Долгожданная глава: 71 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ПЕРЕВОД ЭКСКЛЮЗИВА: #Интервью #Экстра #Профили 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 💡РАЗБОР СЮЖЕТА: #предположения_по_сюжету #человеческий_перевод #иероглифы_Лотус 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 #новости - все важное из тви Мохито 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 АРТЫ: #лучшее по моему мнению😅 #припадки_Лу мои припадки внезапной одержимости Сэтом (обычно в такие моменты я кидаю…
❤🔥59💋8🆒5🥰3
ПОСТ НЕ ПО ТЕМЕ Прошу прощения, воспользуюсь возможностями, раз уж такими обладаю😀 Если здесь есть люди, работающие со звуком в разных DAW - этот пост для вас🫥 Всё же настал тот момент в моей карьере, когда приходится начинать покупать софт, какой юзаешь, а не просто его пиратить… …так вот поэтому начала я отслеживать всевозможные скидки и раздачи плагинов😡 Ну и в общем, я это всё дело себе в телеге записываю, мог…
👏58❤🔥10👀2🙉2
Кто-то специально в Шанхай на выставку Эннеады ехал❤️ #новости
❤🔥233💋34🔥19🤩6
🌸 Автор в 🧤: @rrr666Xie #Сэт
❤🔥208🔥21🍌5😁2😨1
😬 Автор в тви: @melmel1239063 #Другие
❤🔥186💋29🔥8🥰6🌚2😘2🍌1😎1
Я сильно извиняюсь, но молчать не могу (если бы не эта манхва, до создания этого канала не дошло бы) Неужели Бендок воскресла и продолжает выпускать экстры по альт реальности?🤤 (Very хитрый ход - малыха имела план б по заработку еще во время выхода основной арки)
custom 5208901620368159575123❤🔥10🍌6😎4💋2
0:12
custom 520890162036815957517💋4
OH.MY.FUCKING.GOD 🔇Не оставлю этот шедевр без закусона👇 Автор в 🎀: @sfthnbhjt909090 #Сэт #лучшее
🔥134❤🔥33custom 520890162036815957512😎4
Кинули мне в бот то, что некоторым из нас кажется уже очевидным и отнюдь не удивительным, однако… Решила запостить, чтобы показать тем, кто еще не в курсе (практика показывает, что такие до сих пор есть), какой перевод кушают читатели либа🚬 Если вы до сих читаете данную работу на либе, то Исида для вас - младшая сестра Сэта🤯 Пы.сы: на этом канале 1 сезон переведен по-людски #человеческий_перевод
🙉142❤🔥45🙏8😨5🍌1
Не подумайте, что я засоряю канал артами, я просто не могла пройти мимо лысого мулата Осириса...🤭 Автор в тви: @ssisiisiss_ #СэтОсирис #смена_полов
🔥115🤣25🙉14👎5🥰3😨3custom 52089016203681595752🍌1
Я очень извиняюсь, но этот арт такой летний…🕺
❤🔥44🔥4😎2🙉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @en_nead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@en_nead named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𓁝 𐌀𐌁𐌙𐌃𐌏𐌔 𓁣” (@en_nead), 4,796 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/en_nead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.