Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خبب

Channel

خبب

@elonmuskihachat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

—subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001971325053
TypeChannel
Username@elonmuskihachat
Created15 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/elonmuskihachat

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 15 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎2896.6%
🔥13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2023 to 15 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 May 2023, 11:44 UTC48 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @O0O0O0100

دوستان چنل یوتیوب تازه زدیم برای فعلا 150 نفر بشیم آموزش های حرف ای را شروع میکنیم تنها چنل هستیم که صادقانه می‌خواهیم کنار مردم خود باشیم پس حمایت کنید عزیزان https://youtu.be/00RqRyy7fNI

16 Apr 2023, 16:48 UTC969 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

والا نمیدونستم چنل علمی اینقدر ادمین های احمق عقب افتاده داشته باشه 😂

👎3

15 Apr 2023, 14:43 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @elonmuskiha

منتظر باشید..

👎3

15 Apr 2023, 14:43 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @elonmuskiha

آیدی رو لازم داری ؟

👎3

15 Apr 2023, 14:43 UTC43 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @elonmuskiha

فیلم عکس های لو رفته ایلان با دوست دختر شو میذارم آدم های پول دار همه کثیفن

👎4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @elonmuskihachat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“خبب” (@elonmuskihachat). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elonmuskihachat.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.