Channel
@eempathy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,359subscribers
+73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001310371337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eempathy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eempathy |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 1,359 | +4 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 1,355 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 1,365 | +15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 1,350 | +50 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 1,300 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,302 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 1,296 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 1,287 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 1,286 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 1,286 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
561 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 393 | 70.1% | |
| custom 5372908545748513735 | 73 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5190593330131516532 | 40 | 7.13% | |
| custom 5202071647409939608 | 25 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5440864643587266445 | 14 | 2.50% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 2.32% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.535% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eempathy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А еще я люблю делать отсылки ко второй части "Головоломки", подчеркивая, что персонаж Тревоги никогда не был антогонистом. Потому что нет плохих эмоций :) Поэтому цели "избавиться" от тревоги нет. Есть цель иначе на неё реагировать и иначе с ней обращаться, тогда она снижается (как в конце мультика).
❤14
Психообразование это часть процесса в психотерапии, то есть помимо всяких техник и активного слушания психологи рассказывают что и как устроено в психике Особенно хорошо работает, когда человек приходит с симтомами тревожных и депрессивных состояний Утром собрала презентацию про тревогу и хочу с вами поделиться 🤩 (коллеги, тоже сохраняйте-забирайте в работу, мы все делаем одно больше дело)
custom 537290854574851373512
Что ещё важно для того, чтобы быть эмпатичным?
❤9custom 53729085457485137355custom 52020716474099396082
Продолжаем разговор про эмпатию. Принесла вам видео, в котором хорошо объясняется, что такое эмпатия и чем она отличается от жалости. Прежде чем вы его посмотрите, сделаю предупреждение о трудностях перевода :) В видео sympathy переводят как «сочувствие» и его противопоставляют эмпатии. Для нас, руссоязычных людей, сочувствие все-таки несет добрый смысл и поэтому при просмотре может возникать диссонанс. Потому вот…
❤12custom 51905933301315165324💔2
Когда надо идти к специалисту
❤10
Культура поп-психологии аккуратно убедила нас, что люди без эмпатии – плохие люди. Будто эмпатия – ангельская добродетель, присущая хорошим и светлым людям. Но все не так черно-бело, как хотелось бы нашему мозгу. Эмпатия сама по себе не статична. Скорее это навык (софт скилл) и акт коммуникации, работа которого зависит от множества факторов: внутреннего ресурса, низкого уровня алекситимии (то есть способности понима…
❤16
В психотерапии интериоризация – это процесс, когда внешние установки, поведение психолога или новый опыт отношений становятся частью внутреннего мира клиента. Это главный механизм, за счет которого человек меняет отношение к себе и учится самопомощи. #назаметку
custom 537290854574851373519custom 52020716474099396085❤3
клиент, когда всё то хорошее и заботливое, что отражал ему психолог каждую встречу, наконец-то интериоризировалось:
❤22
Избегая боли и неудач, можно однажды избежать и собственной жизни. Со стороны избегающее поведение может восприниматься как лень, безразличие или отсутствие амбиций, но на самом деле оно «помогает» на время не сталкиваться с переживанием собственной уязвимости. Это способ психики защитить себя от неприятных чувств, болезненных мыслей, способ не столкнуться со своей неидеальностью и неидеальностью другого. Иногда это…
❤31💔10custom 51905933301315165328
:)
❤27custom 53729085457485137353
Я начала замечать, что мои посты копируют другие специалисты (слово в слово). И выдают за свои. Друзья и коллеги, если вы уважаете меня и мой труд (особенно когда пишите мне в личные сообщения комплименты, слова восхищения и благодарности), будьте добры делать репост или указывать авторство. Это нетрудно. И я верю, что вы все способны прийти к самому себе, вдохновляясь, но все таки внутри своего «проприума» говоря …
❤32custom 537290854574851373510custom 54408646435872664454custom 51905933301315165323
Информированное согласие и правила работы со мной (обновленное) Записаться / задать вопрос: @sabinarakhm
custom 52020716474099396089
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eempathy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЭМПАТИЯ” (@eempathy), 1,359 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eempathy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.