Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 《`#𝙀𝘿𝙑𝘼𝙍𝘿𝙎𝙆𝙄𝙀🧊》

Channel

《`#𝙀𝘿𝙑𝘼𝙍𝘿𝙎𝙆𝙄𝙀🧊》

@edw01rdskie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001889679387
TypeChannel
Username@edw01rdskie
Descriptionфан клуб эдварда. мужская кф без анкет. админ: @anielols владелец: @ed01ward
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 10 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/edw01rdskie

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 February 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓222.2%
👍222.2%
🙊222.2%
🆒111.1%
👎111.1%
🙉111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2023 to 6 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Mar 2023, 17:32 UTC344 views0 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/PSCHSS чс нашей кф снова пополнился. уебанская кф с участниками за 5 копеек, которые обиделись на владельца и решили заспамить. (вывод с того, что все участники в моём чс) ладно бы ещё заспамили, но не так же тупо.. предупредили что придут их друзья, а потом удивились, почему заявки отклонили ХАХАХАХХАХАА

Signed `𝗘𝗗𝗪𝗔𝗥𝗗!¡

19 Feb 2023, 21:10 UTC564 viewsread 31 August 2026

чс нашей кф пополняется! @taesooni данная личность сливает переписки, ноет 24/7 из-за хуйни и просит людей чтоб они написывали нотации владельцу просто потому, что тот сказал что ныть по бывшим это не очень хорошо.

Signed !¡edward|🕷|

19 Feb 2023, 16:59 UTC608 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

‼️У НАС ПЕРЕЗАГРУЗКА,НЕ ТЕРЯЙТЕ НАС.‼️ #edwardskie_RP

🙉1

Signed !¡edward|🕷|

18 Feb 2023, 17:41 UTC414 viewsread 31 August 2026

ахуеть, 149 просмотров из ниоткуда..

Signed ((🔞)!.𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘊.¡)

13 Feb 2023, 20:21 UTC480 viewsread 31 August 2026

‼️ ИТОГИ ПЕРЕЗАГРУЗКИ‼️ дорогие союзники,как вы заметили у нас произошла перезагрузка. что изменилось: 1. название было: 𝐑𝐞𝐝 𝐋𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 стало: •𝐹𝐿𝐸𝑈𝑅𝑆 𝑀𝑂𝑈𝑅𝐴𝑁𝑇𝐸𝑆• 2. юзер кф был: @redlkf стал: @mourir_kf 3. # для рп. был: #𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨_𝙧𝙥 стал: #𝙛𝙡𝙚𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙧𝙥 #𝙛𝙡𝙚𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙧𝙥

Signed ((🔞)!.𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘊.¡)

12 Feb 2023, 17:53 UTC457 viewsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bloodi_lily

❗СОЮЗНИКИ ДЕМОНИЧЕСКИХ ❗ Напишите в комментариях хотите ли вы продолжить союз с нами, но только мы объединимся с другим кланом Арианнских. Так будут существовать два клана, Арианнские и Демонические, но на одном канале. #𝗘𝗣𝗜𝗖_𝗗𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗦_РП

Signed ((🔞)!.𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘊.¡)

12 Feb 2023, 12:03 UTC432 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

блять, надо ещё союз лист и правила делать

👍1

Signed ((🔞)!.𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘊.¡)

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @edw01rdskie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“《`#𝙀𝘿𝙑𝘼𝙍𝘿𝙎𝙆𝙄𝙀🧊》” (@edw01rdskie). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edw01rdskie.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.