6 Mar 2025, 19:23 UTCviews —
Channel created
Channel
Первочевские
@edlan1488
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002305843178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @edlan1488 |
| Description | СВОд указов капитализма: 📜1. кидаем вторичек через 5 минут. 📜2.1 Ебля с батей только по выходным 📜2.2 Нехуй слушать Шевцова 📜3. Жируем на далары💵 📜4. Сваге🤑 время🕰 подшару час⏲ 📜5.Достаем вторичек через 5 минут |
| Created | 6 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/edlan1488 |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
1 post held, back to 6 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 1 post for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Showing the 1 most recent of 1 post we hold for @edlan1488. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,290,647 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Первочевские” (@edlan1488). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edlan1488.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.