INSTAGRAM FREE FOLLOWERS AND LIKES 2025 NEW
- for Windows23%
- for Android77%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤37😭15👏3👍2

Channel
@edittoonz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,198subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002413366955 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @edittoonz |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/edittoonz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 3,198 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 3,206 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 3,211 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 3,223 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 3,232 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 3,233 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 3,233 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
456 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 340 | 74.6% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 8.33% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 4.61% | |
| 😭 | 15 | 3.29% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 3.07% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 1.54% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.658% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.439% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.219% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.219% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.219% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.219% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
INSTAGRAM FREE FOLLOWERS AND LIKES 2025 NEW
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤37😭15👏3👍2
https://t.me/boost/edittoonz START!
👍10👎7❤1
DONATE FOR USDT TRC20 TCaucvY2y7MvxYnjxKwU6zWxy6wMMpgA3f LTC ltc1q4k2v043ja9a82s7nta7dzpv9xzf4mv47g5a44g USDC bep20 0x91b895638F1e57854FfcF32adAF4FDd7882c63e8
❤10
What you need?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7
Is video ka Script Copied hai Expertise YT bhai ke latest wale video se 😅😅 Expertise Yt bhai sorry for this 🙏
❤31👍1
https://youtu.be/oO73iI8ZteA?si=vmw68g-R8w5V2_XE
❤9👎1
MOBILE METHOD ONLY NO NEED PC & LAPTOP 💻 •_____• 🔥 FREE WIFI TOOL ALERT🔥 WIFI HACK TOOL DROP⚡ 🚀 WIFI HACK METHOD 💻 Easy • Fast • 100% Working LINK 🔗🖇️👇 https://www.mediafire.com/folder/itgzqnpaw39ac/WIFI+TOOL BY HACKER JANI ✓
👎10❤7🤬3👍1
Bhaiyo ❤️❤️ Thankyou Thankyou Thankyou Thankyou So Much 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 Bharosa nhi hota 10K Followers Complete Ho gya bhaiyo Thankyou ❤️😊😊❤️
❤22🥰4👏2🔥2
XML FILE 🗃️ CHYIA TO 20 REACT KARO 👀
❤54👎3❤🔥1👏1🔥1
Video Dekha kya ??
👍14
https://youtu.be/QNb7zkOhbRY?si=kIVfQzqxIKo_pyD_
Jaldi hi milte hai YouTube pe ek Dhamakedar Tutorial ke sath ❤️❤️ Kisi ne Sochi nhi hogi 💀😊
❤25👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @edittoonz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
INSTAGRAM FREE FOLLOWERS AND LIKES 2025 NEW
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What you need?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 28 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Edit Toonz” (@edittoonz), 3,198 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edittoonz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.