Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Эдгар Про Кино

Channel

Эдгар Про Кино

@ed_prokino

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

54,620subscribers

-605 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002275833152
TypeChannel
Username@ed_prokino
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ed_prokino

Growth

54,62055,22554,922.57 August 2026 — 55,225 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,222 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,184 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,178 subscribers11 August 2026 — 55,147 subscribers12 August 2026 — 55,124 subscribers13 August 2026 — 55,082 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55,044 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55,018 subscribers17 August 2026 — 54,994 subscribers18 August 2026 — 54,967 subscribers19 August 2026 — 54,924 subscribers20 August 2026 — 54,908 subscribers21 August 2026 — 54,881 subscribers22 August 2026 — 54,853 subscribers24 August 2026 — 54,821 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,776 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,759 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,730 subscribers28 August 2026 — 54,697 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,653 subscribers30 August 2026 — 54,620 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -605. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,529–55,316 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 17:1354,620-33
29 Aug 2026, 14:2454,653-44
28 Aug 2026, 13:4754,697-33
27 Aug 2026, 15:4554,730-29
26 Aug 2026, 17:1654,759-17
25 Aug 2026, 18:4354,776-45
24 Aug 2026, 16:2654,821-32
22 Aug 2026, 23:2254,853-28
21 Aug 2026, 15:5254,881-27
20 Aug 2026, 17:1754,908-16
19 Aug 2026, 17:3454,924-43
18 Aug 2026, 14:0454,967-27
17 Aug 2026, 12:3354,994-24
16 Aug 2026, 02:1655,018-26
14 Aug 2026, 13:5855,044-38
13 Aug 2026, 01:3455,082-42
12 Aug 2026, 02:3255,124-23
11 Aug 2026, 04:5655,147-31
10 Aug 2026, 03:4055,178-6
9 Aug 2026, 01:1155,184first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 54,620 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,730
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held37 (25 July 202630 August 2026)
Views total181,830
Reactions total2,450
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19m 08s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,416 reactions across 37 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥63418.6%
59217.3%
🤣55816.3%
❤‍🔥41612.2%
👍40111.7%
😁2948.61%
💅722.11%
😨681.99%
😢551.61%
🤯501.46%
🌚320.937%
👏300.878%
🥴220.644%
💔200.585%
🤔200.585%
🕊160.468%
🗿150.439%
🙏150.439%
👎130.381%
🫡130.381%
22 further kinds802.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,416reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 37 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ed_prokino. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,030 views27 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
Video

Он уже видео снимает как дед🥹 Том Круз и Энн Хэтэуэй сообщают, что приступят к съёмкам "Дни грома 2" после того, как Энн родит ребёнка.

🔥184❤‍🔥2😁2🤣1

29 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈2,740 views72 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🎬 Он должен был умереть, но новая вакцина изменила всё. Гениальный учёный предлагает смертельно больному предпринимателю испытать свою разработку. Вакцину вводят — и происходит настоящее чудо: мужчина с последней стадией рака выздоравливает. Учитывая всю эмоциональность момента, неужели кто-то искренне верил, что создателям позволят просто так спасти человечество в обход миллиардных прибылей монополистов? Оцениваем

❤‍🔥47👍116🤔5💅1💯1😍1

28 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈3,580 views100 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

😍 Сидни Суини знает как заставить нас посмотреть рекламу.

❤‍🔥52🔥2311🥴6👍4🤩3💅1

26 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈4,730 views126 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

😄Когда согласился на роль Призрачного гонщика, а потом на пост режиссёра назначили Кристофера Нолана, который ненавидит компьютерную графику:

🤣102🔥135💅2😁2👍1🤪1

25 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈5,470 views47 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🎬Из-за участия в «Людях Икс» Инди Наваретти была вынуждена отказаться от роли в сиквеле «Схватки» с Леонардо Ди Каприо и Кристианом Бэйлом. По данным портала Page Six, после успеха «Обсессии» актриса завалена предложениями.

27👏7❤‍🔥5👍4🐳2💅1🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈5,940 views86 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

😄 0% осуждения, 100% понимания.

36😁28🔥13🤣7👏1💅1

22 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈6,740 views107 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

🎬Человек, создавший человека-паука рассказывает, что над ним все смеялись, когда он придумал величайшего супергероя в истории кино

🔥67❤‍🔥1611🤔4🫡4👏2💔2💅1

21 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈6,720 views72 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

😎Дейв Батиста - новый Кратос! Теперь уже точно! Актер заменит травмированного Райана Херста в сериале God of War.

❤‍🔥34👍21🔥94🤨3💅1

20 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC≈6,950 views95 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🎬«Одиссея» собрала более $1.338 млрд в мировом прокате, обогнав «Дэдпула и Росомаху». Теперь это самый кассовый фильм с рейтингом R за всю историю.

46👍27❤‍🔥7👎4🙈4🔥3💅2🏆1

19 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC≈7,400 views100 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
Photo

🕷Том Холланд получит больше $100 млн за «Человек-паук: Новый день» — дело в отличных сборах картины. Как передают источники The Wrap, за роль Холланд уже получил свой самый крупный гонорар — $20 млн, вдвое больше, чем за «Нет пути домой». Но с учётом процентов со сборов гонорар вырастет до как минимум $100 млн, что сделает актёра одной из самых высокооплачиваемых звёзд фильмов Marvel. Примерно столько же получил Р

👍52🔥2111😁7😎3😱3💅2🤩1

18 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈7,510 views79 reactions6 Starsread 30 August 2026
Photo

😍Я определенно буду смотреть «Людей Икс» ради сюжета. Ага. Исключительно ради сюжета.

31😁23❤‍🔥11👍4😍4💅3🔥2😈1

17 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈7,140 views90 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

😄Хью Джекман и Райан Рейнольдс выпустили короткое видео, в котором обращаются к Кевину Файги с просьбой добавить их в «Мстители: Доктор Дум». — Чувак, у них 28 человек. Зачем мы им нужны? — Потому что мы особенные. — Мы не особенн… — А теперь следуй чертовому сценарию! Учитывая всю комичность ситуации, участие Логана и болтливого наемника в фильме уже можно считать вопросом решенным?

😁54👍10❤‍🔥96🔥6🤣3💅2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @ed_prokino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTCAnonymous Poll833 voters

Давайте решим, на чтобы Вы пошли , если бы человека паук не перенесли на месяц из-за колобка?

  1. 😅Конечно на Колобка22%
  2. 🕷Ты угораешь?78%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эдгар Про Кино” (@ed_prokino), 54,620 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ed_prokino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.