18 measurements spanning 20 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,404–24,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 21:45
24,410
+1
29 Aug 2026, 23:57
24,409
-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:36
24,411
-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:42
24,414
+1
25 Aug 2026, 06:49
24,413
-4
24 Aug 2026, 06:13
24,417
-3
22 Aug 2026, 10:23
24,420
-4
21 Aug 2026, 01:13
24,424
-2
20 Aug 2026, 04:02
24,426
-3
19 Aug 2026, 06:34
24,429
-3
18 Aug 2026, 07:42
24,432
-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:57
24,434
-3
15 Aug 2026, 18:58
24,437
+2
14 Aug 2026, 11:23
24,435
-5
12 Aug 2026, 23:26
24,440
+1
12 Aug 2026, 01:22
24,439
+1
11 Aug 2026, 03:21
24,438
no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:46
24,438
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
423 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
202
47.8%
🔥
136
32.2%
❤
60
14.2%
👏
11
2.60%
😁
7
1.65%
🥰
6
1.42%
👎
1
0.236%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 423reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eco_rotang. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2026 to 7 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А сколько метров лозы брать, чтобы точно хватило?🤔
Один из самых частых вопросов у тех, кто начинает плести из искусственного ротанга.
И я прекрасно понимаю эту боль.
Когда только начинаешь, сложно рассчитать длину.
То лозы не хватает в самый неподходящий момент, то наоборот остаётся слишком много.
Поэтому я сделал для вас удобный калькулятор расчёта длины лозы для кашпо из искусственного ротанга🌿
В калькулятор…
Я исполнил свою давнюю мечту 🚐
Хочу поделиться с вами радостью.
Я давно мечтал об автодоме.
В прошлом году мы брали автодом в аренду и всей семьёй ездили на Алтай (в комментариях прикрепил фото с той поездки)
И, честно, после той поездки я уже не мог спокойно жить😄
Каждый день думал об этом ощущении свободы, когда ты сам выбираешь маршрут. Можешь остановиться в красивом месте, выпить кофе с видом на горы и никуда…
Первая плетёная корзиночка от Любови😍
Обратите внимание на отзыв, ей попался жесткий пруток. Для плетения бескаркасной корзинки, берите мягкий или средний.
Для первой работы получилось очень хорошо👍 Тут как и с кашпо, с каждым разом будет получаться лучше😉
Напишите в сообщения во ВКонтакте слово «КОРЗИНКА» и я расскажу подробнее о мастер-классе: vk.me/eco_rotang
Мифы о плетении кашпо из ротанга, которые мешают тебе начать
До сих пор встречаю одинаковые фразы:
«Это только для тех, у кого золотые руки»
«У меня нет терпения на такое»
«Материалы стоят дорого»
«Чтобы плести, нужно художественное образование»
Разберёмся по пунктам👇
Миф 1. Надо быть супер талантливым
Плетение кашпо — это навык и последовательность действий. Первые работы получатся неровными у многих людей и эт…
Сплести свою первую корзинку можно за 1-2 часа, это проще и быстрее плетения кашпо из ротанга
И для плетения понадобится только ротанг в форме прутка, толщиной 2.5-3 мм. Для одной корзинки достаточно всего 27 метров ротанга😊
Уже 90 человек получили доступ к мастер-классу по плетению корзинки🔥
Это подробный урок, где я показываю, как своими руками создать красивую и аккуратную корзинку. Подойдёт даже тем, кто только начинает😉
Если тоже хотите научиться, напишите в сообщения ВКонтакте слово «КОРЗИНКА» и я расскажу подробнее о мастер-классе: vk.me/eco_rotang
А это корзинка в деталях😊
Такую красоту можно научиться делать, пройдя мастер-класс по плетению корзинки😉
Напишите в сообщения ВКонтакте слово «КОРЗИНКА» и я расскажу подробнее о мастер-классе: vk.me/eco_rotang
👍17❤4🔥4😁1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @eco_rotang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,379,540 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Плетение кашпо из ротанга” (@eco_rotang), 24,410 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eco_rotang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
