Channel
@ebanoePHP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,454subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001060928566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ebanoePHP |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 March 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ebanoePHP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 1,454 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,455 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 1,457 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 1,457 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 February 2025 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,287 |
| Reactions total | 113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
933 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 282 | 30.2% | |
| 🤣 | 261 | 28.0% | |
| 💩 | 166 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5429557596719694774 | 95 | 10.2% | |
| 🔥 | 65 | 6.97% | |
| 🤡 | 40 | 4.29% | |
| 😭 | 22 | 2.36% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.214% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 933reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итак вот новый канал. Туда буду писать сами догадаетесь про что. Тема мне интересна, поэтому посты будут часто(во всяком случае ближайшие полгода). Те кто вступит сейчас, смогут называться олдами и быковать на тех кто вступит через неделю t.me/ai_for_geeks t.me/ai_for_geeks t.me/ai_for_geeks А вот наш новый чат(тут даже самые тупорылые должны уже понять на какую тему). Надеюсь, у нас получится сохранить там ту же а…
🤡8👍3🔥1
Вчера новости так и не опубликовал, а всё почему? Потому что я(как и в любой другой день) занимался agentic engenitring. Вы можете использовать термин вайбкодинг, но он уже среди уважаемых людей считается зашкваром. Если хотите понять почему и в чем отличия, спросите у Kimi. Но пост не об этом Канал очень давно изжил себя, за последний год, я даже не пытался выдавить из себя хоть что-то сюда. Конечно, тут основная п…
👍25😭7🔥5💩4👎1🤡1custom 54295575967196947741
Завтра будут новости!
🤣25💩16🤡8custom 54295575967196947745🔥3
Надо срочно написать какой-нибудь пост, а то даже последние подписчики к хуям поотписываются!!! Только какой??? 🧐🧐🧐
🤣26💩9🔥4
Иногда читаю, что приосходит тут в коментах и понимаю, что нужно расписать правила общения. Как вам идея взять такой список за основу? 1. Всегда нужно помнить о том, что по ту сторону экрана находится живой человек. Не следует забывать, что всё написанное в комментариях к постам в @ebanoePHP сохраняется, и стоит несколько раз подумать, прежде чем что-то написать. 2. Следует придерживаться тех же норм поведения, что…
💩73👍35🔥2
Ой бляяяя...
🤣36💩8👍6😭1
Контент в "профессиональной соц сети для для поиска и установления деловых контактов"
🤣56custom 542955759671969477411
Пятничная история, про то как я неудачно продался Хотел опубликовать в пятницу, но проебался. После каждой рекламы полезной рекомендации качественного образовательного контента меня обвиняют в продажности. Я искренне не понимаю суть этих претензий и чем подписчикам мешают подобные посты. Но сейчас не об этом. Чаще всего рекламу покупают именно образовательные курсы и крупные компании со всякими HR активностями. Од…
🤣34💩11custom 54295575967196947747🔥2
Пост про PHP! Не ждали? А если точнее про php 7.2 Ебался я вчера очередной день, делая правки в проект на KOHANA. Написал небольшую SDK обёртку к одному из REST core сервисов, протестил вдоль и поперек на локалке и запушил в мастер Однако, вместо удовлетворения от качественно проделанной работы, испытал некоторого рода негодование, когда метод API, в котором юзался мой класс стал возвращать 500. Естественно, я как…
custom 542955759671969477471👍28🤣18💩2🔥2😭1
Поздравляю всех с Cyprus National Day! Отдохните как следует, перед началом рабочей недели. Однако у бедолаг, которые зачем-то работают за рубли по ТК РФ сегодня день дурачка(и рабочий день заодно, лол). Вы могли это заметить по тупым(тупее чем обычно) постам в телеграмм каналах, где вкидывается откровенная дичь, которую даже не надо опровергать, потому что, сегодня можно якобы. Обычно я игнорирую такого рода зашкв…
🤡20👍19🔥3
Как научиться рисовать system design? У меня солидный опыт по работе с крупным хайлодом, я легко могу уточнить все функциональные и не функциональные требования, подумать над тонкосятми масштабирования любой системы, но блять, как только дело доходит до визуализации, получается такая вот херня, как на скрине. В итоге даже дорисовать ничего не получается, потому что после 10 минут рисованию уже нихрена непонятно стан…
👍8
ebanoePHP pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ebanoePHP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,113,686 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ebanoePHP” (@ebanoePHP), 1,454 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebanoePHP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.