Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for "ВвМ" КРОК_1 Фарма

Channel

"ВвМ" КРОК_1 Фарма

@easy_krok_farm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,905subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001642301170
TypeChannel
Username@easy_krok_farm
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/easy_krok_farm

Growth

1,9051,9381,921.57 August 2026 — 1,937 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,937 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,938 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,935 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,927 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,925 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,923 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,922 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,911 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,908 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,905 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,900–1,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 16:401,905-3
4 Sept 2026, 01:581,908-3
1 Sept 2026, 01:081,911-3
28 Aug 2026, 18:331,914-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:071,922-1
23 Aug 2026, 07:071,923-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:431,925-2
16 Aug 2026, 17:531,927-8
12 Aug 2026, 20:031,935-3
10 Aug 2026, 01:411,938+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:161,937no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:091,937first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5757.0%
👍3232.0%
❤‍🔥33.00%
🔥33.00%
🥰33.00%
👎22.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2024 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC170 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduniversityhelpPhoto

Підготовка до 🎀🎀🎀🎀 1️⃣, 2️⃣ та 3️⃣by @the_queen_sandra 🌸 Безкоштовний ZOOM - структура КРОК та поради до підготовки 🌸Авторська методика навчання + ІНТЕРАКТИВНІ завдання 🌸 Нереально естетичні та корисні презентації без води! 🌸 Канал з матеріалами до КРОК 1,2,3 📱 Інстаграм 📱 TikTok 📱Телеграм-канал За записом на Безкоштовний ZOOM пишіть❤️ @the_queen_sandra

17 May 2024, 17:22 UTC≈19,500 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Антидоти 💊 @easy_krok_farm ⚙ @easy_krok_pathphys ⚰ @easy_krok_pathology

40👍7🔥2👎1

14 Apr 2024, 09:40 UTC≈14,000 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/FUrVec0v42w?si=VCK_CBecCHDUDBO4 📌Автор: krok1_2 💊 @easy_krok_farm ⚙ @easy_krok_pathphys ⚰ @easy_krok_pathology

👍4👎1

14 Apr 2024, 09:40 UTC≈9,780 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/MpY2U0zcvmA?si=ET8J7z6SUU1Gbk7q 📌Автор: krok1_2 💊 @easy_krok_farm ⚙ @easy_krok_pathphys ⚰ @easy_krok_pathology

👍41

14 Apr 2024, 09:40 UTC≈7,560 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/4QYIKrvfBFo?si=8zUi6Lr1D6WxBIXZ 📌Автор: krok1_2 💊 @easy_krok_farm ⚙ @easy_krok_pathphys ⚰ @easy_krok_pathology

👍2

14 Apr 2024, 09:39 UTC≈6,030 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/q_qIRDA_sCA?si=yu6Ieci4KmvShqD0 📌Автор: krok1_2 💊 @easy_krok_farm ⚙ @easy_krok_pathphys ⚰ @easy_krok_pathology

👍21

28 Mar 2024, 12:26 UTC≈8,050 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Антибіотики Автор: https://t.me/corp_goose 💊 @easy_krok_farm ⚙ @easy_krok_pathphys ⚰ @easy_krok_pathology

8👍5🔥1

26 Mar 2024, 20:01 UTC≈6,280 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @easy_krok_pathphysPoll

?

  1. Ischaemia21%
  2. Arterial hyperaemia8%
  3. Venous hyperaemia54%
  4. Stasis5%
  5. Thrombosis13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍3❤‍🔥1

26 Mar 2024, 20:01 UTC≈4,100 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @easy_krok_pathphys

A female patient consulted a doctor about leg pain that arises usually toward the evening; feet and shins edemata. Objectively: leg skin is cyanotic, cold to the touch. What type of peripheral circulation disorder does the patient present with? Жінка звернулася до лікаря зі скаргами на болі у ногах, які з’являються ввечері, набряк стоп і гомілок. Об’ктивно: шкіра на ногах синюшного кольору, холодна на дотик. Який ти

❤‍🔥2

13 Mar 2024, 18:26 UTC≈21,200 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴Новий канал з поясненнями тестів КРОК 1 по ПАТФІЗУ 👀 https://t.me/easy_krok_pathphys

🥰3

11 Mar 2024, 14:23 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

#Фармакологія Мій файл для підготовки до іспиту по фармі + невідкладні стани з тими препаратами, які даються саме на іспиті (Likar.nmu)💕🧪 Автор: @dovhanna 💊 @easy_krok_farm ⚙ @easy_krok_pathphys ⚰ @easy_krok_pathology

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @easy_krok_farm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Mar 2024, 20:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,300 voters approx.

?

  1. Ischaemia21%
  2. Arterial hyperaemia8%
  3. Venous hyperaemia54%
  4. Stasis5%
  5. Thrombosis13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2024 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"ВвМ" КРОК_1 Фарма” (@easy_krok_farm), 1,905 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/easy_krok_farm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.