Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EarnPark Official

Channel

EarnPark Official

@earnpark_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,022subscribers

-141 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002437388845
TypeChannel
Username@earnpark_official
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/earnpark_official

Growth

7,0227,1637,092.57 August 2026 — 7,163 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,155 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,136 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,085 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,069 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,039 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,022 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -141. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,001–7,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 20:247,022-17
24 Aug 2026, 02:487,039-30
20 Aug 2026, 02:517,069-16
17 Aug 2026, 11:467,085-31
14 Aug 2026, 00:287,116-20
11 Aug 2026, 02:337,136-19
7 Aug 2026, 23:207,155-8
7 Aug 2026, 06:317,163first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.22%
avg views ÷ 7,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
507
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held28 (2 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total6,595
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

393 reactions across 28 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13333.8%
10927.7%
👍8822.4%
👏174.33%
👀153.82%
🖕51.27%
🤝51.27%
💯41.02%
🙏41.02%
30.763%
👎30.763%
🏆20.509%
😁20.509%
🌚10.254%
🍌10.254%
🍾10.254%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC137 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

PARK Liquidity Update – August 20 As promised – here's where things stand. What "final testing" has actually been about. We told you the Uniswap pool moved to final testing. Today we can show what's inside – because this is not a default pool deployment: • 0% pool fee. More of the value stays in your trade instead of going to swap fees. (Network gas still applies.) • Trading rebates, paid inside the swap. Up to

3👍3🍾1🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC248 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Last week we published three questions to ask any yield platform – including us. Fair is fair. Here's how EarnPark answers them. 1. Where does the yield come from? Every strategy page shows its mechanism: market-making spreads, liquidity pool fees, lending rates – named, not implied. If you've been following our Yield Receipt series, you've seen the format: source, terms, primary risk. → Explore the strategies 2. W

🔥31👏1

17 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC258 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Yield Receipt #2: Maker Core – up to 10% APY One strategy per post: where the yield comes from, what the terms are, and the main risk. No adjectives – just the receipt. Assets: Available for 18 assets, including USDT, USDC, BTC, SOL. APY: Fixed. Up to 10% APY depending on the asset. Source of yield: Market-making. The strategy runs algorithmic liquidity provision on major exchanges – placing simultaneous buy and

👍43🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC442 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

PARK Liquidity: Official Statement As promised this week – here is our liquidity plan for PARK. The strategy is on-chain first. PARK lives where its holders are: on the EarnPark platform, in staking, vesting and balances. Our plan brings its liquidity to the same logic – visible on-chain, verifiable by anyone, reachable from any wallet. What this means concretely: • Uniswap pool v4 – in final testing. The DEX lis

👍9🔥9👀41

13 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC397 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Not just us – any platform where you deposit. If the answers aren't clear, that's the answer. 1. Where does the yield come from? "Trading", "staking", "DeFi" – those are categories, not answers. A real answer names the mechanism: which fees, which spreads, which pools. If yield has no visible source, you are the source. 2. What happens in a bad month? Every strategy can have weaker regimes. A platform that only sho

6👍3🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC404 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

On Monday, we broke down where the 10% APY in USDT DeFi comes from. Today, the other side of the equation: what's the opportunity cost of leaving USDT idle? $10,000 USDT sitting on an exchange: 3 months → $10,000 6 months → $10,000 12 months → $10,000 That's before inflation. At 10% APY, accrued daily, the same $10,000 would look roughly like this: 3 months → ~$10,250 6 months → ~$10,500 12 months → ~$11,000 W

👍54🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC456 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Yield Receipt #001: USDT DeFi: 10% APY New series. One strategy per post: where the yield comes from, what the terms are, and the main risk. No adjectives – just the receipt. APY: 10% APY, accrued daily. Source of yield: Trading fees from stablecoin liquidity pools. Earnings come from trading fees and protocol incentives provided by leading DeFi ecosystems, including Arbitrum, Avalanche, Starknet, Hydration, and P

👍54🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC540 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📖July issue of EarnPark Monthly is out. Inside: • Who bought the bottom: whales accumulated more than 270,000 BTC near $59,000 while ETF inflows stalled. Our analysts on what the largest wallets saw that the market didn't. • The seller nobody expected: Strategy, the company that bought 4% of all Bitcoin, sold 3,588 BTC in July. The full story is in the report. • The bigger picture: a 9-3 Fed vote, an AI correction t

🔥4👀31

6 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC679 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🎙Missed yesterday's X Space? We've got you covered! We published a full recap of everything we discussed – platform numbers, PARK token utility, the upcoming DEX listing, and what's ahead for the rest of 2026. 👉 Read the Full Recap

5🔥4🤝2

4 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC694 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Your PARK could already be earning. Stake unlocked PARK → earn up to 20% monthly yield in PARK. Rewards accrue and compound daily. Why stake now: the rate is dynamic and early stakers get the bigger share. Rewards come from a monthly PARK pool shared across all staked tokens. Smaller pool → higher rate. As more PARK gets staked, the rate adjusts down. 👉 Stake PARK

👀74🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC818 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📣Announcement! As a result of our monthly rates revision, some rates are increasing starting in August. Rates increase: ARB Maker Core: up to 5% APY → up to 7% APY LINK Maker Core: up to 5% APY → up to 7% APY DOGE Maker Core: up to 5% APY → up to 7% APY DOT Maker Core: up to 5% APY → up to 7% APY ZIL Maker Core: up to 5% APY → up to 7% APY The APYs for the other strategies remain unaffected. Website | X | Discord

👍7🔥72

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @earnpark_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 417,211 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EarnPark Official” (@earnpark_official), 7,022 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/earnpark_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.